Comparative study of FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification for cataract patients with high myopia.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Lijuan Zhao, Mengjia Tan, Junfang Zhang, Mengyao Hao, Shu Liang, Min Ji, Huaijin Guan
{"title":"Comparative study of FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification for cataract patients with high myopia.","authors":"Lijuan Zhao, Mengjia Tan, Junfang Zhang, Mengyao Hao, Shu Liang, Min Ji, Huaijin Guan","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term changes in cornea, retina, and choroid of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with conventional phacoemulsification (CPS) in high myopia patients with cataract.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangsu Province, China.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective single-center study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, ocular clinical features, ultrasound power, absolute phacoemulsification time, and effective phacoemulsification time were recorded for each patient. Endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), center foveal thickness (CFT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Intraoperative parameters and intraoperative/postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>97 eyes (46 eyes and 51 eyes in the FLACS and CPS groups, respectively) were included and analyzed. Effective phacoemulsification time was lower in the FLACS group compared with the CPS group ( P < .05). The increase in CCT was significantly lower in the FLACS group compared with the CPS group at 1 week and 1 month ( P < .05). CDVA and IOP were similar in both groups at the final visit ( P > .05). The ECD decreased was lower among CPS patients compared with FLACS patients. CFT, SFCT, and CVI increase in both groups but were increased more in the CPS group with high myopia patients. No serious complications occurred in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FLACS is a more safety and effective in cataract patients with high myopia. It has advantages in effectively reducing EPT and promoting faster recovery of the cornea, macular, and choroidal thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"624-630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the short-term changes in cornea, retina, and choroid of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with conventional phacoemulsification (CPS) in high myopia patients with cataract.

Setting: Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangsu Province, China.

Design: Prospective single-center study.

Methods: Demographics, ocular clinical features, ultrasound power, absolute phacoemulsification time, and effective phacoemulsification time were recorded for each patient. Endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), center foveal thickness (CFT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Intraoperative parameters and intraoperative/postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: 97 eyes (46 eyes and 51 eyes in the FLACS and CPS groups, respectively) were included and analyzed. Effective phacoemulsification time was lower in the FLACS group compared with the CPS group ( P < .05). The increase in CCT was significantly lower in the FLACS group compared with the CPS group at 1 week and 1 month ( P < .05). CDVA and IOP were similar in both groups at the final visit ( P > .05). The ECD decreased was lower among CPS patients compared with FLACS patients. CFT, SFCT, and CVI increase in both groups but were increased more in the CPS group with high myopia patients. No serious complications occurred in either group.

Conclusions: FLACS is a more safety and effective in cataract patients with high myopia. It has advantages in effectively reducing EPT and promoting faster recovery of the cornea, macular, and choroidal thickness.

对高度近视白内障患者进行 FLACS 与传统超声乳化术的比较研究。
目的:比较飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与传统超声乳化手术(CPS)对高度近视白内障患者角膜、视网膜和脉络膜的短期影响:中国江苏省南通大学附属医院:前瞻性单中心研究:记录每位患者的人口统计学特征、眼部临床特征、超声乳化功率、绝对乳化时间和有效乳化时间。术前、术后 1 周、1 个月和 3 个月评估内皮细胞密度(ECD)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)、最佳矫正距离视力(CDVA)、眼压(IOP)、中心眼窝厚度(CFT)、眼窝下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)和脉络膜血管指数(CVI)。记录术中参数和术中、术后并发症:结果:共纳入并分析了 97 只眼睛(FLACS 组和 CPS 组分别为 46 只和 51 只)。FLACS组的累积耗散能量低于CPS组(P<0.05)。与 CPS 组相比,FLACS 组在 1 周和 1 个月时的 CCT 增幅明显较低(P <0.05)。两组患者在最后一次就诊时的 CDVA 和眼压相似(P > 0.05)。与 FLACS 患者相比,CPS 患者的 ECD 下降率较低。两组患者的CFT、SFCT和CVI均有所增加,但CPS组高度近视患者的增幅更大。两组患者均未出现严重并发症:FLACS对高度近视的白内障患者更安全有效。结论:FLACS 对高度近视的白内障患者更安全有效,它在有效减少 EPT 和促进角膜、黄斑和脉络膜厚度更快恢复方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信