Bacteremia and Mortality among Patients with Nontunneled and Tunneled Catheters for Hemodialysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-02-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3292667
Carla Santos De Lima, Flora Braga Vaz, Rodrigo Peixoto Campos
{"title":"Bacteremia and Mortality among Patients with Nontunneled and Tunneled Catheters for Hemodialysis.","authors":"Carla Santos De Lima, Flora Braga Vaz, Rodrigo Peixoto Campos","doi":"10.1155/2024/3292667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Central venous catheters for hemodialysis (HD) can be nontunneled catheters (NTC) or tunneled catheters (TC). Bacteremia and dysfunction are complications that can impact morbidity and mortality. We decided to compare the rates of bacteremia and dysfunction between NTC and TC and patient survival 90 days after catheter insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort to evaluate catheters inserted between January 2011 and December 2020 in a tertiary hospital. Catheters in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease were included. Patients with acute kidney injury, catheters that lasted less than three HD sessions, and patients who died within one week after insertion were excluded. Bacteremia and dysfunction rates, bacteremia-free survival, and dysfunction-free survival were investigated. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for patient survival at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>670 catheters were analyzed in 287 patients, 422 NTC (63%), and 248 TC (37%). The rates of confirmed bacteremia per 1,000 catheter-days were 1.19 for NTC and 0.20 for TC (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The confirmed or possible bacteremia rates were 2.27 and 0.37 per 1,000 catheter-days for NTC and TC, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The dysfunction rates were 3.96 and 0.86 for NTC and TC, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Patient survival at 90 days was higher in the TC group than the NTC group (96.8% vs. 89.1%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found lower rates of bacteremia and dysfunction for TC and demonstrated that using NTC affects patient mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"3292667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3292667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Central venous catheters for hemodialysis (HD) can be nontunneled catheters (NTC) or tunneled catheters (TC). Bacteremia and dysfunction are complications that can impact morbidity and mortality. We decided to compare the rates of bacteremia and dysfunction between NTC and TC and patient survival 90 days after catheter insertion.

Methods: Retrospective cohort to evaluate catheters inserted between January 2011 and December 2020 in a tertiary hospital. Catheters in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease were included. Patients with acute kidney injury, catheters that lasted less than three HD sessions, and patients who died within one week after insertion were excluded. Bacteremia and dysfunction rates, bacteremia-free survival, and dysfunction-free survival were investigated. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for patient survival at 90 days.

Results: 670 catheters were analyzed in 287 patients, 422 NTC (63%), and 248 TC (37%). The rates of confirmed bacteremia per 1,000 catheter-days were 1.19 for NTC and 0.20 for TC (p < 0.0001). The confirmed or possible bacteremia rates were 2.27 and 0.37 per 1,000 catheter-days for NTC and TC, respectively (p < 0.0001). The dysfunction rates were 3.96 and 0.86 for NTC and TC, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patient survival at 90 days was higher in the TC group than the NTC group (96.8% vs. 89.1%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: We found lower rates of bacteremia and dysfunction for TC and demonstrated that using NTC affects patient mortality.

血液透析非隧道式和隧道式导管患者的菌血症和死亡率。
导言:用于血液透析(HD)的中心静脉导管可以是非隧道式导管(NTC)或隧道式导管(TC)。菌血症和功能障碍是会影响发病率和死亡率的并发症。我们决定比较 NTC 和 TC 的菌血症和功能障碍发生率以及导管插入后 90 天的患者存活率:方法:对一家三级医院 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间插入的导管进行回顾性队列评估。纳入了终末期慢性肾病患者的导管。急性肾损伤患者、导管持续时间少于三次血液透析疗程的患者以及插入导管后一周内死亡的患者除外。对菌血症和功能障碍发生率、无菌血症存活率和无功能障碍存活率进行了调查。使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型对患者 90 天的存活率进行了多变量分析:对 287 名患者的 670 根导管进行了分析,其中 422 根为 NTC 导管(占 63%),248 根为 TC 导管(占 37%)。每 1,000 个导管日中,NTC 和 TC 的确诊菌血症率分别为 1.19 和 0.20(P < 0.0001)。NTC 和 TC 的确诊或可能菌血症率分别为每 1,000 导管日 2.27 例和 0.37 例(P < 0.0001)。NTC 和 TC 的功能障碍率分别为 3.96 和 0.86(P < 0.0001)。TC组患者的90天存活率高于NTC组(96.8% vs. 89.1%;p < 0.0001):我们发现 TC 的菌血症和功能障碍发生率较低,并证明使用 NTC 会影响患者死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Nephrology
International Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of kidney diseases and associated disorders. The journal welcomes submissions related to cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pathophysiology of renal disease and progression, clinical nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信