The efficacy of social skills training (SST) and social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for negative symptoms: A meta-analysis

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hong Wang , Na Hu , Jiabao Chai , Wenqian Huang , Hanxue Yang , Xuanzi Zhou , Fuquan Liu , Ying Li
{"title":"The efficacy of social skills training (SST) and social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for negative symptoms: A meta-analysis","authors":"Hong Wang ,&nbsp;Na Hu ,&nbsp;Jiabao Chai ,&nbsp;Wenqian Huang ,&nbsp;Hanxue Yang ,&nbsp;Xuanzi Zhou ,&nbsp;Fuquan Liu ,&nbsp;Ying Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The efficacy of antipsychotic drugs in improving negative symptoms of schizophrenia remains controversial. Psychological interventions, such as Social Skills Training (SST) and Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT), have been developed and applied in clinical practice. The current meta-analysis was therefore conducted to evaluate the efficacy of controlled clinical trials using SST and SCIT on treating negative symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematical searches were carried out on PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated to assess the effect size of SST/SCIT on negative symptoms. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity and identify potential factors that may influence their efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 23 studies including 1441 individuals with schizophrenia were included. The SST group included 8 studies with 635 individuals, and the SCIT group included 15 studies with 806 individuals. The effect size for the efficacy of SST on negative symptoms was -0.44 (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.28; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), while SCIT was -0.16 (95% CI: -0.30 to -0.02; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that while both SST and SCIT can alleviate negative symptoms, the former appears to be more effective. Our results provide evidence-based guidance for the application of these interventions in both hospitalized and community individuals and can help inform the treatment and intervention of individuals with schizophrenia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616323000599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

The efficacy of antipsychotic drugs in improving negative symptoms of schizophrenia remains controversial. Psychological interventions, such as Social Skills Training (SST) and Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT), have been developed and applied in clinical practice. The current meta-analysis was therefore conducted to evaluate the efficacy of controlled clinical trials using SST and SCIT on treating negative symptoms.

Methods

Systematical searches were carried out on PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated to assess the effect size of SST/SCIT on negative symptoms. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity and identify potential factors that may influence their efficacy.

Results

A total of 23 studies including 1441 individuals with schizophrenia were included. The SST group included 8 studies with 635 individuals, and the SCIT group included 15 studies with 806 individuals. The effect size for the efficacy of SST on negative symptoms was -0.44 (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.28; p < 0.01), while SCIT was -0.16 (95% CI: -0.30 to -0.02; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that while both SST and SCIT can alleviate negative symptoms, the former appears to be more effective. Our results provide evidence-based guidance for the application of these interventions in both hospitalized and community individuals and can help inform the treatment and intervention of individuals with schizophrenia.

社交技能训练(SST)和社交认知与互动训练(SCIT)对阴性症状的疗效:荟萃分析
背景和目的抗精神病药物在改善精神分裂症阴性症状方面的疗效仍存在争议。心理干预措施,如社交技能训练(SST)和社会认知与互动训练(SCIT),已被开发并应用于临床实践。因此,本次荟萃分析旨在评估使用社交技能训练(SST)和社交认知与互动训练(SCIT)治疗阴性症状的临床对照试验的疗效。计算标准化平均差(SMD)和 95% 置信区间(CI),以评估 SST/SCIT 对阴性症状的影响大小。研究人员还进行了分组和元回归分析,以探索异质性的来源,并确定可能影响其疗效的潜在因素。SST组包括8项研究,涉及635名患者;SCIT组包括15项研究,涉及806名患者。SST对阴性症状的疗效效应大小为-0.44(95% CI:-0.60至-0.28;p <0.01),而SCIT为-0.16(95% CI:-0.30至-0.02;p <0.01)。我们的研究结果为这些干预措施在住院患者和社区患者中的应用提供了循证指导,有助于为精神分裂症患者的治疗和干预提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信