13 years of hand surgery without an anesthesiologist. An analysis of efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists.

Andrzej Żyluk
{"title":"13 years of hand surgery without an anesthesiologist. An analysis of efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists.","authors":"Andrzej Żyluk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The assistance of anaesthesiologist is considered an inseparable part of most surgical procedures, with the exception of a small proportion of minor procedures performed under local anaesthesia. In hand surgery, a vast majority of procedures, even those lasting several hours, can be carried out under regional (brachial plexus block) or local (infiltration) anaesthesia. These can be delivered by the surgeons themselves, allowing the surgeries to be carried out without the assistance of anesthesiologists.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists in the course of hand surgery procedures performed within the institution headed by the author of this article.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; The analysis was based on the records of anesthesia protocols filled out by the surgeons who delivered the anesthesia and who operated on the patients. The variables considered included the efficacy of anesthesia and the anesthesia-related adverse effects and complications.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Over a period of 13 years (2010-2022), a total of 24,703 surgeries were delivered; of these, 22,228 (91%) surgeries were carried out without anesthesiologists, with anesthesia being delivered by the surgeon him/herself. The efficacy of these procedures (local anasthesia and brachial plexus blocks combined) was 99%. A total of 631 (2.8%) anesthesia-related adverse reactions were recorded, most of them being transient, requiring immediate interventions and not leading to any serious sequelae. In only 17 cases (0.07%), adverse effects resulted in cancellation and rescheduling of the elective surgery.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Pre-surgical anesthesia as delivered prior to hand surgery procedures by the surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists is effective and safe while being associated with numerous benefits for patients, surgeons and the health care system's budget.&lt;/br&gt.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b><br>Introduction:</b> The assistance of anaesthesiologist is considered an inseparable part of most surgical procedures, with the exception of a small proportion of minor procedures performed under local anaesthesia. In hand surgery, a vast majority of procedures, even those lasting several hours, can be carried out under regional (brachial plexus block) or local (infiltration) anaesthesia. These can be delivered by the surgeons themselves, allowing the surgeries to be carried out without the assistance of anesthesiologists.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists in the course of hand surgery procedures performed within the institution headed by the author of this article.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> The analysis was based on the records of anesthesia protocols filled out by the surgeons who delivered the anesthesia and who operated on the patients. The variables considered included the efficacy of anesthesia and the anesthesia-related adverse effects and complications.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Over a period of 13 years (2010-2022), a total of 24,703 surgeries were delivered; of these, 22,228 (91%) surgeries were carried out without anesthesiologists, with anesthesia being delivered by the surgeon him/herself. The efficacy of these procedures (local anasthesia and brachial plexus blocks combined) was 99%. A total of 631 (2.8%) anesthesia-related adverse reactions were recorded, most of them being transient, requiring immediate interventions and not leading to any serious sequelae. In only 17 cases (0.07%), adverse effects resulted in cancellation and rescheduling of the elective surgery.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Pre-surgical anesthesia as delivered prior to hand surgery procedures by the surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists is effective and safe while being associated with numerous benefits for patients, surgeons and the health care system's budget.</br>.

没有麻醉师的手部手术 13 年。分析外科医生在没有麻醉师协助的情况下进行术前麻醉的有效性和安全性。
<b><br>引言:</b> 麻醉师的协助被认为是大多数外科手术不可分割的一部分,只有一小部分在局部麻醉下进行的小型手术除外。在手外科手术中,绝大多数手术,甚至是持续数小时的手术,都可以在区域(臂丛神经阻滞)或局部(浸润)麻醉下进行。这些麻醉可由外科医生自行实施,从而使手术无需麻醉师的协助即可进行。</br><b><br>材料和方法:</b>分析基于实施麻醉和为患者进行手术的外科医生填写的麻醉协议记录。考虑的变量包括麻醉效果以及与麻醉相关的不良反应和并发症。这些手术(局部麻醉和臂丛神经阻滞)的有效率为 99%。共记录了 631 例(2.8%)与麻醉相关的不良反应,其中大部分是一过性的,需要立即干预,不会导致任何严重的后遗症。仅有 17 例(0.07%)不良反应导致了择期手术的取消和重新安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信