Australian medical practitioners' perspectives about current practice relating to fitness to drive assessment for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Claire Spargo, Kate Laver, Angela Berndt, Zoe Adey-Wakeling, Stacey George
{"title":"Australian medical practitioners' perspectives about current practice relating to fitness to drive assessment for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative study","authors":"Claire Spargo,&nbsp;Kate Laver,&nbsp;Angela Berndt,&nbsp;Zoe Adey-Wakeling,&nbsp;Stacey George","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the perspectives of Australian medical practitioners about current practice, and the potential benefit of tools and resources to support fitness to drive assessment for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews with 22 medical practitioners from cognitive/memory clinics, hospitals, general practice and driving fitness assessment services in Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two overarching themes were generated: (1) Uncomfortable decisions, describing feelings of discomfort expressed by practitioners about making fitness to drive recommendations, with two subthemes: (a) ‘Feeling uncertain’ and (b) ‘Sticking your neck on the line’; and (2) Easing the discomfort, describing participants' desire for tools/resources to support practitioners to increase comfort with fitness to drive recommendations, with two subthemes: (a) ‘Seeking certainty’ and (b) ‘Focusing on the process’ conveying two different perspectives about how this may be achieved. There was a desire for a new in-office assessment tool capable of accurately predicting fitness to drive outcomes and views that an evidence-based clinical pathway could improve practitioners' confidence in decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Perceptions of discomfort relating to fitness to drive assessment of older people with dementia and MCI exist amongst medical practitioners from health-care settings across Australia. In the absence of a well-validated in-office assessment tool, practitioners may benefit from an evidence-based clinical pathway to guide driving recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.13281","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the perspectives of Australian medical practitioners about current practice, and the potential benefit of tools and resources to support fitness to drive assessment for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 22 medical practitioners from cognitive/memory clinics, hospitals, general practice and driving fitness assessment services in Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.

Results

Two overarching themes were generated: (1) Uncomfortable decisions, describing feelings of discomfort expressed by practitioners about making fitness to drive recommendations, with two subthemes: (a) ‘Feeling uncertain’ and (b) ‘Sticking your neck on the line’; and (2) Easing the discomfort, describing participants' desire for tools/resources to support practitioners to increase comfort with fitness to drive recommendations, with two subthemes: (a) ‘Seeking certainty’ and (b) ‘Focusing on the process’ conveying two different perspectives about how this may be achieved. There was a desire for a new in-office assessment tool capable of accurately predicting fitness to drive outcomes and views that an evidence-based clinical pathway could improve practitioners' confidence in decision-making.

Conclusions

Perceptions of discomfort relating to fitness to drive assessment of older people with dementia and MCI exist amongst medical practitioners from health-care settings across Australia. In the absence of a well-validated in-office assessment tool, practitioners may benefit from an evidence-based clinical pathway to guide driving recommendations.

澳大利亚执业医师对当前痴呆症和轻度认知障碍老年人驾驶能力评估实践的看法:定性研究。
目的描述澳大利亚医疗从业人员对当前实践的看法,以及支持痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人驾驶能力评估的工具和资源的潜在益处:对来自澳大利亚认知/记忆诊所、医院、全科诊所和驾驶能力评估服务机构的 22 名医疗从业人员进行了半结构式访谈。对访谈结果进行了反思性主题分析:结果:产生了两个首要主题:(1) 不舒服的决定,描述了从业人员在提出驾驶能力建议时所表达的不舒服的感觉,其中有两个次主题:(a) "感觉不确定";(b) "不舒服":(2)缓解不适感,描述了参与者对工具/资源的渴望,以支持从业人员提高驾驶适宜性建议的舒适度,有两个次主题:(a) "寻求确定性 "和(b) "关注过程",传达了关于如何实现这一目标的两种不同观点。人们希望有一种新的诊室评估工具,能够准确预测 "适合驾驶 "的结果,并认为以证据为基础的临床路径可以提高从业人员对决策的信心:结论:澳大利亚各地医疗机构的执业医师在对老年痴呆症和 MCI 患者进行驾驶能力评估时存在不适感。由于缺乏经过充分验证的诊室评估工具,从业人员可能会受益于循证临床路径,以指导驾驶建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信