Outcomes of antiplatelet therapy before endovascular treatment of acute large vessel occlusion: Data from the ANGEL-ACT registry

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dapeng Sun , Shuo Li , Raynald , Xiaochuan Huo , Baixue Jia , Xu Tong , Anxin Wang , Ning Ma , Feng Gao , Dapeng Mo , Thanh N Nguyen , Zhongrong Miao , ANGEL-ACT study group
{"title":"Outcomes of antiplatelet therapy before endovascular treatment of acute large vessel occlusion: Data from the ANGEL-ACT registry","authors":"Dapeng Sun ,&nbsp;Shuo Li ,&nbsp;Raynald ,&nbsp;Xiaochuan Huo ,&nbsp;Baixue Jia ,&nbsp;Xu Tong ,&nbsp;Anxin Wang ,&nbsp;Ning Ma ,&nbsp;Feng Gao ,&nbsp;Dapeng Mo ,&nbsp;Thanh N Nguyen ,&nbsp;Zhongrong Miao ,&nbsp;ANGEL-ACT study group","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT or DAPT) within 24 hours before endovascular treatment (EVT) could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry were divided into antiplatelet therapy (APT) and non-APT groups. The APT group was divided into SAPT and DAPT groups. Outcome measurement included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution, change in the NIHSS at 7 days or discharge, number of passes, modified first pass effect (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and mortality within 90 days. To compare the outcomes, we performed multivariable analyses by adjusting for the propensity score calculated by the logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1611 patients, 1349 were in the non-APT group, while 262 (16.3 %) were in the APT group (122 [46.6 %] received SAPT, 140 [53.4 %] received DAPT). APT, SAPT or DAPT were not associated with a shift to better outcomes (non-APT vs. APT, 3[0–5] vs. 3[0–5], common odds ratio [OR], 1.04, 95 %confidence interval [CI]:0.82–1.34<em>, P</em> = 0.734). DAPT was associated with mFPE (OR,2.05, 95 %CI:1.39–3.01<em>, P</em>&lt;0.001), more NIHSS reduction at 7 days or discharge (β, -2.13, 95 %CI: -4.02–-0.24<em>, P</em> = 0.028), lower number of passes (β, -0.40, 95 %CI: -0.68–-0.12<em>, P</em>=0.006), and shorter procedure duration (β, -12.4, 95 %CI: -23.74–-1.05<em>, P</em> = 0.032) without increasing odds of successful recanalization<em>, P</em>H within 24 hours and mortality with 90 days .</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>APT before MT for AIS due to LVO does not affect clinical outcome in 90 days despite a tendency to reduce MT procedure time and number of passes. APT before MT in LVO does not increase SICH or mortality rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 101183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986124000919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT or DAPT) within 24 hours before endovascular treatment (EVT) could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO).

Methods

Patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry were divided into antiplatelet therapy (APT) and non-APT groups. The APT group was divided into SAPT and DAPT groups. Outcome measurement included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution, change in the NIHSS at 7 days or discharge, number of passes, modified first pass effect (mFPE), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and mortality within 90 days. To compare the outcomes, we performed multivariable analyses by adjusting for the propensity score calculated by the logistic regression model.

Results

Of 1611 patients, 1349 were in the non-APT group, while 262 (16.3 %) were in the APT group (122 [46.6 %] received SAPT, 140 [53.4 %] received DAPT). APT, SAPT or DAPT were not associated with a shift to better outcomes (non-APT vs. APT, 3[0–5] vs. 3[0–5], common odds ratio [OR], 1.04, 95 %confidence interval [CI]:0.82–1.34, P = 0.734). DAPT was associated with mFPE (OR,2.05, 95 %CI:1.39–3.01, P<0.001), more NIHSS reduction at 7 days or discharge (β, -2.13, 95 %CI: -4.02–-0.24, P = 0.028), lower number of passes (β, -0.40, 95 %CI: -0.68–-0.12, P=0.006), and shorter procedure duration (β, -12.4, 95 %CI: -23.74–-1.05, P = 0.032) without increasing odds of successful recanalization, PH within 24 hours and mortality with 90 days .

Conclusions

APT before MT for AIS due to LVO does not affect clinical outcome in 90 days despite a tendency to reduce MT procedure time and number of passes. APT before MT in LVO does not increase SICH or mortality rates.

急性大血管闭塞血管内治疗前抗血小板治疗的效果:来自 ANGEL-ACT 注册中心的数据。
目的研究在血管内治疗(EVT)前24小时内进行单一或双重抗血小板治疗(SAPT或DAPT)能否改善大血管闭塞(LVO)患者的临床预后:方法:将ANGEL-ACT登记处的患者分为抗血小板治疗(APT)组和非APT组。APT 组又分为 SAPT 组和 DAPT 组。结果测量包括 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)分布、7 天或出院时 NIHSS 的变化、通过次数、首次通过再通畅(FPR)、成功再通畅、症状性颅内出血(SICH)和 90 天内死亡率。为了比较结果,我们根据逻辑回归模型计算出的倾向得分进行了多变量分析:在 1611 名患者中,1349 人属于非 APT 组,262 人(16.3%)属于 APT 组(122 人[46.6%]接受 SAPT,140 人[53.4%]接受 DAPT)。APT、SAPT 或 DAPT 与转好结果无关(非 APT vs. APT,3[0-5] vs. 3[0-5],普通比值比 [OR],1.04,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.82-1.34,P= 0.734)。DAPT 与 FPR 相关(OR,2.05, 95%CI:1.39-3.01, PConclusions:尽管 MT 有缩短手术时间和减少通过次数的趋势,但在 MT 前进行 APT 并不会影响 LVO 引起的 AIS 在 90 天内的临床预后。在 LVO MT 前进行 APT 不会增加 SICH 或死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信