Efficacy of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Cytojournal Pub Date : 2024-01-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/Cytojournal_37_2023
Priya Yadav, Sana Ahuja, Sufian Zaheer, Mukul Singh, Chintamani Chintamani
{"title":"Efficacy of intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.","authors":"Priya Yadav, Sana Ahuja, Sufian Zaheer, Mukul Singh, Chintamani Chintamani","doi":"10.25259/Cytojournal_37_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The most important determinant of patient outcome in cases of breast carcinoma is the regional lymph node status. Intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) allows the surgeon to perform axillary lymph node dissection in the same sitting if required. The commonly performed intraoperative methods for SLN evaluation are touch imprint cytology (TIC) and frozen section. The present study aimed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TIC with histopathological diagnosis as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The lymph nodes sent for intraoperative examination were bisected along the long axis and touched onto clean glass slides followed by Toluidine blue and rapid Papanicolaou staining. The imprints were reviewed and the interpretation was conveyed to the surgeon. Thereafter, the biopsy was fixed in 10% formalin followed by paraffin embedding with hematoxylin and eosin staining. The specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated with histopathological diagnosis as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients who underwent resection surgery were included in the study. Majority (36.7%) of patients were in the age group 41-50 years with a mean age of 48.1 ± 10.6 years. There were 54 cases (90%) and 6 cases (10%) of invasive carcinoma of no special type (ductal) and lobular carcinoma, respectively. According to modified Bloom-Richardson scoring, the cases were categorized as Grade 1-6 cases (10%), Grade 2-36 (60%), and Grade 3-18 (30%). The sensitivity and specificity of TIC were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of TIC in the diagnosis of metastasis in SLN was 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIC is an easy-to-perform, cost-effective, rapid, and accurate technique for axillary lymph node evaluation, which also overcomes the need for a cryostat.</p>","PeriodicalId":49082,"journal":{"name":"Cytojournal","volume":"21 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytojournal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_37_2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The most important determinant of patient outcome in cases of breast carcinoma is the regional lymph node status. Intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) allows the surgeon to perform axillary lymph node dissection in the same sitting if required. The commonly performed intraoperative methods for SLN evaluation are touch imprint cytology (TIC) and frozen section. The present study aimed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TIC with histopathological diagnosis as gold standard.

Material and methods: The lymph nodes sent for intraoperative examination were bisected along the long axis and touched onto clean glass slides followed by Toluidine blue and rapid Papanicolaou staining. The imprints were reviewed and the interpretation was conveyed to the surgeon. Thereafter, the biopsy was fixed in 10% formalin followed by paraffin embedding with hematoxylin and eosin staining. The specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated with histopathological diagnosis as gold standard.

Results: A total of 60 patients who underwent resection surgery were included in the study. Majority (36.7%) of patients were in the age group 41-50 years with a mean age of 48.1 ± 10.6 years. There were 54 cases (90%) and 6 cases (10%) of invasive carcinoma of no special type (ductal) and lobular carcinoma, respectively. According to modified Bloom-Richardson scoring, the cases were categorized as Grade 1-6 cases (10%), Grade 2-36 (60%), and Grade 3-18 (30%). The sensitivity and specificity of TIC were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of TIC in the diagnosis of metastasis in SLN was 90%.

Conclusion: TIC is an easy-to-perform, cost-effective, rapid, and accurate technique for axillary lymph node evaluation, which also overcomes the need for a cryostat.

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结术中印迹细胞学检查的疗效。
目的:乳腺癌患者的预后最重要的决定因素是区域淋巴结状态。对前哨淋巴结(SLN)进行术中评估可使外科医生在必要时在同一坐位进行腋窝淋巴结清扫。术中评估前哨淋巴结的常用方法是触摸印迹细胞学(TIC)和冰冻切片。本研究旨在确定以组织病理学诊断为金标准的 TIC 的敏感性、特异性和准确性:将送去进行术中检查的淋巴结沿长轴一分为二,触及干净的玻璃载玻片,然后进行甲苯胺蓝和快速巴氏染色。对印记进行复核,并将解释传达给外科医生。之后,将活检组织固定在 10%福尔马林中,再用石蜡包埋,苏木精和伊红染色。以组织病理学诊断为金标准,对特异性、敏感性、诊断准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值进行了评估:研究共纳入了 60 名接受切除手术的患者。大多数患者(36.7%)的年龄在 41-50 岁之间,平均年龄为(48.1 ± 10.6)岁。无特殊类型的浸润性癌(导管癌)和小叶癌分别有 54 例(90%)和 6 例(10%)。根据改良布卢姆-理查德森评分法,病例分为 1-6 级(10%)、2-36 级(60%)和 3-18 级(30%)。TIC 的敏感性和特异性分别为 87.5%和 100%。TIC诊断SLN转移的准确率为90%:结论:TIC 是一种操作简便、经济高效、快速准确的腋窝淋巴结评估技术,而且无需使用低温恒温器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytojournal
Cytojournal PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.10%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CytoJournal is an open-access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Diagnostic Cytopathology including Molecular aspects. The journal is owned by the Cytopathology Foundation and published by the Scientific Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信