Ratio of oxygen saturation index for predicting high-flow nasal cannula outcomes in emergency department for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia: A retrospective study.

IF 1.1 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/tjem.tjem_159_23
Cynthia Karam, Ahmad Oseili, Fadia M Shebbo, Mohamad Fakih, Mohamad F El-Khatib
{"title":"Ratio of oxygen saturation index for predicting high-flow nasal cannula outcomes in emergency department for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia: A retrospective study.","authors":"Cynthia Karam, Ahmad Oseili, Fadia M Shebbo, Mohamad Fakih, Mohamad F El-Khatib","doi":"10.4103/tjem.tjem_159_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been used as an initial ventilatory support for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with mixed levels of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, the effectiveness of HFNC when used as initial ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF exclusively is not well documented. Ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX) index (ROX = [SpO<sub>2</sub>/fraction of inspired oxygen]/respiratory rate) was shown to predict the outcome of HFNC in intensive care unit patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the utility of the ROX index for predicting HFNC therapy success/failure in COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF when HFNC is used as the first line of ventilatory support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study in 67 COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF receiving HFNC in the emergency department at a tertiary care academic medical center. ROX index was determined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h of HFNC onset. The need to escalate to noninvasive or invasive ventilatory support was documented. The receiver operating characteristic curves were performed and areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of ROX index for differentiating between patients who will succeed or fail HFNC therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HFNC therapy was successful in 19 patients (28.1%) and failed in 48 patients (71.6%). ROX index after 6 h of HFNC initiation had the best predictive capacity for the outcome of HFNC therapy (AUC = 0.78). ROX index >4.4 at 6 h of HFNC onset was significantly associated with HFNC success/failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROX index at 6 h after initiating HFNC therapy in COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF has a good predictive capacity for HFNC success/failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":46536,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjem.tjem_159_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been used as an initial ventilatory support for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with mixed levels of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, the effectiveness of HFNC when used as initial ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF exclusively is not well documented. Ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX) index (ROX = [SpO2/fraction of inspired oxygen]/respiratory rate) was shown to predict the outcome of HFNC in intensive care unit patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the utility of the ROX index for predicting HFNC therapy success/failure in COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF when HFNC is used as the first line of ventilatory support.

Methods: Retrospective study in 67 COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF receiving HFNC in the emergency department at a tertiary care academic medical center. ROX index was determined at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h of HFNC onset. The need to escalate to noninvasive or invasive ventilatory support was documented. The receiver operating characteristic curves were performed and areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of ROX index for differentiating between patients who will succeed or fail HFNC therapy.

Results: HFNC therapy was successful in 19 patients (28.1%) and failed in 48 patients (71.6%). ROX index after 6 h of HFNC initiation had the best predictive capacity for the outcome of HFNC therapy (AUC = 0.78). ROX index >4.4 at 6 h of HFNC onset was significantly associated with HFNC success/failure.

Conclusion: ROX index at 6 h after initiating HFNC therapy in COVID-19 patients with severe AHRF has a good predictive capacity for HFNC success/failure.

预测 COVID-19 重型低氧血症患者急诊科高流量鼻插管疗效的血氧饱和度指数比值:一项回顾性研究。
目的:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)氧疗已被用作 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)急性低氧呼吸衰竭(AHRF)混合程度患者的初始通气支持。然而,HFNC 作为初始通气支持仅用于严重 AHRF 的 COVID-19 患者的有效性还没有得到充分证实。氧饱和度比值(ROX)指数(ROX = [SpO2/吸入氧分压]/呼吸频率)可预测重症监护室患者使用 HFNC 的效果。我们的研究旨在评估 COVID-19 重型 AHRF 患者在使用 HFNC 作为一线通气支持时,ROX 指数在预测 HFNC 治疗成功/失败方面的实用性:方法:对一家三级医疗学术中心急诊科接受 HFNC 治疗的 67 例 COVID-19 重型 AHRF 患者进行回顾性研究。在 HFNC 开始后的 0、2、6、12 和 24 小时测定 ROX 指数。记录是否需要升级为无创或有创呼吸支持。研究人员绘制了接收者操作特征曲线,并计算了曲线下面积(AUC),以评估 ROX 指数在区分 HFNC 治疗成功或失败患者方面的准确性:结果:19 名患者(28.1%)HFNC 治疗成功,48 名患者(71.6%)治疗失败。开始 HFNC 治疗 6 小时后的 ROX 指数对 HFNC 治疗结果的预测能力最强(AUC = 0.78)。HFNC开始6小时后的ROX指数>4.4与HFNC成功/失败有显著相关性:结论:COVID-19 重型 AHRF 患者开始 HFNC 治疗后 6 小时的 ROX 指数对 HFNC 成功/失败具有良好的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine (Turk J Emerg Med) is an International, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes clinical and experimental trials, case reports, invited reviews, case images, letters to the Editor, and interesting research conducted in all fields of Emergency Medicine. The Journal is the official scientific publication of the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) and is printed four times a year, in January, April, July and October. The language of the journal is English. The Journal is based on independent and unbiased double-blinded peer-reviewed principles. Only unpublished papers that are not under review for publication elsewhere can be submitted. The authors are responsible for the scientific content of the material to be published. The Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine reserves the right to request any research materials on which the paper is based. The Editorial Board of the Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine and the Publisher adheres to the principles of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors, the Council of Science Editors, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the US National Library of Medicine, the US Office of Research Integrity, the European Association of Science Editors, and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信