Social participation mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and loneliness among people with stroke during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2312639
SangJin Lee, Samantha B Randolph, Carolyn M Baum, Marjorie L Nicholas, Lisa Tabor Connor
{"title":"Social participation mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and loneliness among people with stroke during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"SangJin Lee, Samantha B Randolph, Carolyn M Baum, Marjorie L Nicholas, Lisa Tabor Connor","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2312639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People post-stroke experience increased loneliness, compared to their healthy peers and loneliness may have increased during COVID due to social distancing. How social distancing affected loneliness among people after stroke is unknown. Bandura's self-efficacy theory suggests that self-efficacy may be a critical component affecting individuals' emotions, behaviors, attitudes, and interpretation of everyday situations. Additionally, previous studies indicate that self-efficacy is associated with both loneliness and social participation. This study investigates relationships among self-efficacy, social participation, and loneliness in people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine how social participation affects the relationship between self-efficacy and loneliness in people with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>44 participants were community-dwelling individuals, ≥ 6 months post-stroke who participated in a 2-hour phone interview. A regression-based mediation analysis was conducted using these measures: Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale, Activity Card Sort for social participation, and UCLA Loneliness Scale for loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total effect of self-efficacy on loneliness was significant (<i>b</i> = -0.36, <i>p</i> = .01). However, social participation fully mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and loneliness (indirect effect, <i>b</i> = -0.11, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.01]; direct effect, <i>b</i> = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.03, 0]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-efficacy is associated with both social participation and loneliness in people with stroke in this cross-sectional study. Mediation analysis findings suggest that interventions focused on increasing social participation may prevent or potentially alleviate loneliness in people with stroke who have low self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"585-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2312639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People post-stroke experience increased loneliness, compared to their healthy peers and loneliness may have increased during COVID due to social distancing. How social distancing affected loneliness among people after stroke is unknown. Bandura's self-efficacy theory suggests that self-efficacy may be a critical component affecting individuals' emotions, behaviors, attitudes, and interpretation of everyday situations. Additionally, previous studies indicate that self-efficacy is associated with both loneliness and social participation. This study investigates relationships among self-efficacy, social participation, and loneliness in people with stroke.

Objectives: Determine how social participation affects the relationship between self-efficacy and loneliness in people with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: 44 participants were community-dwelling individuals, ≥ 6 months post-stroke who participated in a 2-hour phone interview. A regression-based mediation analysis was conducted using these measures: Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale, Activity Card Sort for social participation, and UCLA Loneliness Scale for loneliness.

Results: The total effect of self-efficacy on loneliness was significant (b = -0.36, p = .01). However, social participation fully mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and loneliness (indirect effect, b = -0.11, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.01]; direct effect, b = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.03, 0]).

Conclusions: Self-efficacy is associated with both social participation and loneliness in people with stroke in this cross-sectional study. Mediation analysis findings suggest that interventions focused on increasing social participation may prevent or potentially alleviate loneliness in people with stroke who have low self-efficacy.

在 COVID-19 期间,社会参与对中风患者的自我效能感和孤独感之间的关系起到了中介作用:一项横断面研究。
背景:与健康的同龄人相比,脑卒中后患者的孤独感会增加。社会疏远如何影响脑卒中后患者的孤独感尚不清楚。班杜拉的自我效能理论认为,自我效能可能是影响个人情绪、行为、态度和对日常情况解释的关键因素。此外,以往的研究表明,自我效能感与孤独感和社会参与度都有关系。本研究调查了中风患者的自我效能感、社会参与和孤独感之间的关系:确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间,社会参与如何影响脑卒中患者的自我效能感与孤独感之间的关系。方法:44 名参与者为脑卒中后≥ 6 个月的社区居民,他们参加了 2 小时的电话访谈。采用以下方法进行了基于回归的中介分析:结果表明:参与策略自我效能量表、社会参与活动卡分类和加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表对自我效能的总影响为 0.5%:结果:自我效能对孤独感的总影响是显著的(b = -0.36,p = .01)。然而,社会参与完全调解了自我效能感与孤独感之间的关系(间接效应,b = -0.11,95% CI [-0.24,-0.01];直接效应,b = -0.25,95% CI [-0.03,0]):在这项横断面研究中,自我效能感与脑卒中患者的社会参与和孤独感都有关系。中介分析结果表明,以增加社会参与为重点的干预措施可以预防或减轻自我效能感低的中风患者的孤独感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信