Building consensus on a set of ENDS-specific pictorial health warnings: a Delphi study among a tobacco control expert panel.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Taghrid Asfar, Michael Schmidt, Olusanya Joshua Oluwole, Alejandra Casas, Lily Friedman, Tarana Ferdous, Seth M Noar, Thomas Eissenberg, Wasim Maziak
{"title":"Building consensus on a set of ENDS-specific pictorial health warnings: a Delphi study among a tobacco control expert panel.","authors":"Taghrid Asfar, Michael Schmidt, Olusanya Joshua Oluwole, Alejandra Casas, Lily Friedman, Tarana Ferdous, Seth M Noar, Thomas Eissenberg, Wasim Maziak","doi":"10.1136/tc-2023-058384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study reports on the development of pictorial health warning labels for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) using the Delphi approach with a panel of tobacco control experts. Twenty-four evidence-based ENDS-specific warnings corresponding to three themes (toxicity, health risks and specific harm) were developed and used in the Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a three-round online Delphi study among 60 experts (55% female) between June 2022 and April 2023. We balanced the panel in areas of expertise and positions relevant to ENDS (risks, benefits). In round 1, participants rated the warnings on attention, relevance to evidence and perceived effectiveness (harm perception, motivation to quit) and provided suggestions for improvement. In rounds 2 and 3, participants ranked the revised warnings based on importance in each theme. We assessed levels of agreement between participants using interquartile deviations and medians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Warnings in theme 1, toxicity, received the highest ratings for perceived effectiveness on harm perception and encouraging quitting ENDS (p<0.05). Experts recommended using clear and affirmative text paired with emotion-provoking pictures and avoiding the rare side effects of ENDS. Most of the top-ranked warnings were from theme 3, ENDS-specific harm, pertained to lung damage, dual use of ENDS and cigarettes, nicotine addiction among youth, anti-ENDS industry sentiment and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study developed 24 evidence-based ENDS health warning labels using a systematic process that included several rounds of expert panel feedback. These warnings can be used to advance ENDS prevention and tobacco control policies and further target different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":"472-480"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study reports on the development of pictorial health warning labels for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) using the Delphi approach with a panel of tobacco control experts. Twenty-four evidence-based ENDS-specific warnings corresponding to three themes (toxicity, health risks and specific harm) were developed and used in the Delphi study.

Methods: We conducted a three-round online Delphi study among 60 experts (55% female) between June 2022 and April 2023. We balanced the panel in areas of expertise and positions relevant to ENDS (risks, benefits). In round 1, participants rated the warnings on attention, relevance to evidence and perceived effectiveness (harm perception, motivation to quit) and provided suggestions for improvement. In rounds 2 and 3, participants ranked the revised warnings based on importance in each theme. We assessed levels of agreement between participants using interquartile deviations and medians.

Results: Warnings in theme 1, toxicity, received the highest ratings for perceived effectiveness on harm perception and encouraging quitting ENDS (p<0.05). Experts recommended using clear and affirmative text paired with emotion-provoking pictures and avoiding the rare side effects of ENDS. Most of the top-ranked warnings were from theme 3, ENDS-specific harm, pertained to lung damage, dual use of ENDS and cigarettes, nicotine addiction among youth, anti-ENDS industry sentiment and toxicity.

Discussion: This study developed 24 evidence-based ENDS health warning labels using a systematic process that included several rounds of expert panel feedback. These warnings can be used to advance ENDS prevention and tobacco control policies and further target different populations.

就一套ENDS专用图形健康警示达成共识:烟草控制专家小组的德尔菲研究。
背景:本研究报告了烟草控制专家小组采用德尔菲法为电子尼古丁释放系统(ENDS)制定图形健康警示标签的情况。在德尔菲研究中,针对三个主题(毒性、健康风险和具体危害)开发并使用了24个基于证据的ENDS特定警示:我们在2022年6月至2023年4月期间对60名专家(55%为女性)进行了三轮在线德尔菲研究。我们平衡了专家小组的专业领域和与 ENDS 相关的立场(风险、益处)。在第一轮研究中,参与者对警示的关注度、与证据的相关性和感知效果(危害感知、戒烟动机)进行评分,并提出改进建议。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者根据每个主题的重要性对修订后的警示进行排名。我们使用四分位数间偏差和中位数评估了参与者之间的一致程度:结果:主题 1 "毒性 "中的警告在危害感知和鼓励戒烟方面获得了最高评分(讨论:本研究采用系统化流程,包括多轮专家小组反馈,制定了24条以证据为基础的ENDS健康警示标签。这些警示可用于推进ENDS预防和烟草控制政策,并进一步针对不同人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信