Nest-building in breeding mice: Impact of macro- and micro-environment.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1177/00236772231171191
Luciana Cintra, Sandra Regina Alexandre-Ribeiro, Julia Trindade Xavier Teixeira, Michel Mancinelli Megid, Thiago Vieira Coucolis, Dennis Albert Zanatto, Victoria Nathaly Leal, Silvia Maria Gomes Massironi, Claudia Madalena Cabrera Mori
{"title":"Nest-building in breeding mice: Impact of macro- and micro-environment.","authors":"Luciana Cintra, Sandra Regina Alexandre-Ribeiro, Julia Trindade Xavier Teixeira, Michel Mancinelli Megid, Thiago Vieira Coucolis, Dennis Albert Zanatto, Victoria Nathaly Leal, Silvia Maria Gomes Massironi, Claudia Madalena Cabrera Mori","doi":"10.1177/00236772231171191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The housing conditions of laboratory mice must be strictly controlled in order to reduce the impact of pathophysiological changes that affect animal health and welfare, possibly resulting in increased variability within experimental results. One way to improve the activity and survival of laboratory mice is to provide nesting material. The objective of this study was to determine if nest-building quality could be used to detect changes in murine mating behaviour in a rodent facility under controlled conditions. Nesting scores of 847 cages with monogamous pairs from three different genetic backgrounds (129, B6 and BALB/c) of both sexes were correlated with 18 predefined variables. The effects on nest quality were evaluated using descriptive data analysis, correspondence analysis and ordinal logistic model fitting. The results showed a strong relationship between nest quality and nest position. Humidity, genetic background, cage change and the number and age of pups in the cage affected the nest-building scores. The most important indicators were cage change and relative humidity, both of which exerted significant negative effects on nest-building quality. Even though the criteria were well defined, the observer could still influence nest score appraisal. However, in a long-term observational study, observers could improve their assessment by training and acquiring greater experience in score assignment. Nest-building scores are easy to assess in the cage, with little discomfort to the animal. Moreover, the nest score is a valid indicator of the health and well-being of laboratory mice and can provide valuable support in the management of animal facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772231171191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The housing conditions of laboratory mice must be strictly controlled in order to reduce the impact of pathophysiological changes that affect animal health and welfare, possibly resulting in increased variability within experimental results. One way to improve the activity and survival of laboratory mice is to provide nesting material. The objective of this study was to determine if nest-building quality could be used to detect changes in murine mating behaviour in a rodent facility under controlled conditions. Nesting scores of 847 cages with monogamous pairs from three different genetic backgrounds (129, B6 and BALB/c) of both sexes were correlated with 18 predefined variables. The effects on nest quality were evaluated using descriptive data analysis, correspondence analysis and ordinal logistic model fitting. The results showed a strong relationship between nest quality and nest position. Humidity, genetic background, cage change and the number and age of pups in the cage affected the nest-building scores. The most important indicators were cage change and relative humidity, both of which exerted significant negative effects on nest-building quality. Even though the criteria were well defined, the observer could still influence nest score appraisal. However, in a long-term observational study, observers could improve their assessment by training and acquiring greater experience in score assignment. Nest-building scores are easy to assess in the cage, with little discomfort to the animal. Moreover, the nest score is a valid indicator of the health and well-being of laboratory mice and can provide valuable support in the management of animal facilities.

繁殖小鼠的筑巢行为:宏观和微观环境的影响
必须严格控制实验鼠的饲养条件,以减少影响动物健康和福利的病理生理变化的影响,这可能会导致实验结果的变异性增加。提高实验鼠活动和存活率的方法之一是提供筑巢材料。本研究的目的是确定在受控条件下,筑巢质量是否可用于检测啮齿动物设施中小鼠交配行为的变化。将 847 个笼子中来自三种不同遗传背景(129、B6 和 BALB/c)的一夫一妻制的雌雄小鼠的筑巢得分与 18 个预定义变量相关联。使用描述性数据分析、对应分析和序数逻辑模型拟合评估了巢质量的影响。结果表明,巢的质量与巢的位置关系密切。湿度、遗传背景、笼子的变化以及笼中幼仔的数量和年龄都会影响筑巢得分。最重要的指标是笼子的变化和相对湿度,这两项指标对筑巢质量都有显著的负面影响。尽管标准定义明确,但观察者仍会影响筑巢得分的评估。不过,在长期的观察研究中,观察者可以通过培训和积累更多的评分经验来改进他们的评估。筑巢得分很容易在笼子里评估,对动物几乎没有不适感。此外,筑巢评分是衡量实验鼠健康和福利的有效指标,可为动物设施的管理提供有价值的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信