Percutaneous microwave ablation on management of hereditary renal cell carcinoma in Von Hippel-Lindau disease.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Hyperthermia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1080/02656736.2024.2308079
Jiye Chen, Lin Zheng, Wei Zhang, Zhen Wang, Jie Yu, Ping Liang
{"title":"Percutaneous microwave ablation on management of hereditary renal cell carcinoma in Von Hippel-Lindau disease.","authors":"Jiye Chen, Lin Zheng, Wei Zhang, Zhen Wang, Jie Yu, Ping Liang","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2024.2308079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of microwave ablation (MWA) for the renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety, Technique efficacy, renal function and oncological outcome of MWA for RCC in VHL patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with RCCs in VHL disease treated by MWA were retrospectively collected from November 2009 to October 2020. The technical efficacy rate and complications were assessed. The outcomes of pre- and post-ablative eGFR were compared. The local recurrent-free survival (LRFS), renal-cancer-free survival (RCFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and complications were presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 patients (mean age, 39.0 years ± 10.7 [SD]; 3 women) with 28 RCCs (mean tumor size, 3.0 cm ± 0.34; mean tumor volume, 20.7 mL ± 43.3) treated with MWA were included. Th median follow-up time was 52 months(IQR:27-80). The overall technical efficacy rate was 100% with no major complications occurred. No significant statistical difference between pre-ablative and postablative creatinine level (102.0 µmol/<i>L</i> ± 30.4 vs 112.3 µmol/<i>L</i> ± 38.7, <i>p</i> = 0.06), but the pre-ablative eGFR level was significantly higher than the post-ablative eGFR (78.0 mL/(min*1.73m<sup>2</sup>) ± 28.6 vs 72 mL/(min*1.73m<sup>2</sup>) ± 31.4, <i>p</i> = 0.04), with the mean decrease of 5.86 ml/(min*1.73m<sup>2</sup>). The local recurrent-free survival(LRFS) and renal-cancer-free survival (RCFS) were 100% and 60%, respectively. The cancer specifical survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were 95.5% and 100%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microwave ablation is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of RCC in VHL disease, preserving renal function and yielding satisfactory oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","volume":"41 1","pages":"2308079"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hyperthermia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2024.2308079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of microwave ablation (MWA) for the renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is unclear.

Objective: To assess the safety, Technique efficacy, renal function and oncological outcome of MWA for RCC in VHL patients.

Methods: Consecutive patients with RCCs in VHL disease treated by MWA were retrospectively collected from November 2009 to October 2020. The technical efficacy rate and complications were assessed. The outcomes of pre- and post-ablative eGFR were compared. The local recurrent-free survival (LRFS), renal-cancer-free survival (RCFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and complications were presented.

Results: A total of 10 patients (mean age, 39.0 years ± 10.7 [SD]; 3 women) with 28 RCCs (mean tumor size, 3.0 cm ± 0.34; mean tumor volume, 20.7 mL ± 43.3) treated with MWA were included. Th median follow-up time was 52 months(IQR:27-80). The overall technical efficacy rate was 100% with no major complications occurred. No significant statistical difference between pre-ablative and postablative creatinine level (102.0 µmol/L ± 30.4 vs 112.3 µmol/L ± 38.7, p = 0.06), but the pre-ablative eGFR level was significantly higher than the post-ablative eGFR (78.0 mL/(min*1.73m2) ± 28.6 vs 72 mL/(min*1.73m2) ± 31.4, p = 0.04), with the mean decrease of 5.86 ml/(min*1.73m2). The local recurrent-free survival(LRFS) and renal-cancer-free survival (RCFS) were 100% and 60%, respectively. The cancer specifical survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were 95.5% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: Microwave ablation is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of RCC in VHL disease, preserving renal function and yielding satisfactory oncological outcomes.

经皮微波消融治疗 Von Hippel-Lindau 病遗传性肾细胞癌。
背景:微波消融术(MWA)治疗冯-希佩尔-林道病(VHL)肾细胞癌(RCC)的效果尚不明确:评估微波消融治疗Von Hippel-Lindau患者RCC的安全性、技术疗效、肾功能和肿瘤预后:方法:回顾性收集2009年11月至2020年10月期间连续接受MWA治疗的VHL病RCC患者。评估技术有效率和并发症。比较了消融前后eGFR的结果。结果显示了局部无复发生存率(LRFS)、无肾癌生存率(RCFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)、总生存率(OS)和并发症:结果:共纳入10例接受MWA治疗的28例RCC患者(平均年龄39.0岁±10.7[SD];女性3例)(平均肿瘤大小3.0厘米±0.34;平均肿瘤体积20.7毫升±43.3)。中位随访时间为 52 个月(IQR:27-80)。总体技术有效率为 100%,无重大并发症发生。剥离前和剥离后的肌酐水平无明显统计学差异(102.0 µmol/L ± 30.4 vs 112.3 µmol/L ± 38.7,p = 0.06),但剥离前的 eGFR 水平明显高于剥离后的 eGFR 水平(78.0 mL/(min*1.73m2) ± 28.6 vs 72 mL/(min*1.73m2) ± 31.4,p = 0.04),平均下降 5.86 ml/(min*1.73m2)。局部无复发生存率(LRFS)和无肾癌生存率(RCFS)分别为 100%和 60%。癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)分别为 95.5%和 100%:结论:微波消融是治疗 VHL 病 RCC 的一种安全可行的方法,既能保留肾功能,又能获得满意的肿瘤治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hyperthermia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信