[Synergies Instead of Rivalries - Expert Opinion on the Misunderstood Roles of Continuous Intrajejunal Levodopa Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Parkinson̓s Disease].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2238-1641
Nils Schröter, Wolfgang H Jost, Michel Rijntjes, Volker Coenen, Sergiu Groppa, Bastian Sajonz
{"title":"[Synergies Instead of Rivalries - Expert Opinion on the Misunderstood Roles of Continuous Intrajejunal Levodopa Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Parkinson̓s Disease].","authors":"Nils Schröter, Wolfgang H Jost, Michel Rijntjes, Volker Coenen, Sergiu Groppa, Bastian Sajonz","doi":"10.1055/a-2238-1641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the therapy of Parkinson̓s disease, both the intrajejunal administration of Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) and, more recently, Levodopa/Carbidopa/Entacapone Intestinal Gel (LECIG), as well as deep brain stimulation (DBS), are employed. These approaches differ significantly in their efficacy and side effect profiles, as well as the timing of their use. Yet, the initiation of therapy for both methods is often simultaneously considered when patients have reached an advanced stage of the disease. From the authors' perspective, however, patients may reach the milestones for the indication of one of these respective treatments at different points in the course of the disease. Individual disease progression plays a pivotal role in this regard. The concept that all patients become candidates for a specific treatment at a predefined time appears erroneous to the authors. In the context of this review, therefore, the therapeutic modalities are presented in terms of their efficacy for different symptoms, the notion of simultaneous timing of their initiation is questioned, and an individualized therapy evaluation is derived, with a focus on quality of life and participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"502-508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2238-1641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the therapy of Parkinson̓s disease, both the intrajejunal administration of Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) and, more recently, Levodopa/Carbidopa/Entacapone Intestinal Gel (LECIG), as well as deep brain stimulation (DBS), are employed. These approaches differ significantly in their efficacy and side effect profiles, as well as the timing of their use. Yet, the initiation of therapy for both methods is often simultaneously considered when patients have reached an advanced stage of the disease. From the authors' perspective, however, patients may reach the milestones for the indication of one of these respective treatments at different points in the course of the disease. Individual disease progression plays a pivotal role in this regard. The concept that all patients become candidates for a specific treatment at a predefined time appears erroneous to the authors. In the context of this review, therefore, the therapeutic modalities are presented in terms of their efficacy for different symptoms, the notion of simultaneous timing of their initiation is questioned, and an individualized therapy evaluation is derived, with a focus on quality of life and participation.

[协同而非竞争--关于连续空肠注射左旋多巴疗法和脑深部刺激疗法在帕金森病治疗中被误解的作用的专家意见]。
在帕金森病的治疗中,既采用了左旋多巴/卡比多巴肠溶胶(LCIG)空肠给药,最近又采用了左旋多巴/卡比多巴/恩他卡朋肠溶胶(LECIG)以及脑深部刺激(DBS)。这些方法在疗效、副作用以及使用时机上都有很大不同。然而,这两种方法通常在患者达到疾病晚期时同时考虑启动治疗。然而,从作者的角度来看,患者可能会在病程的不同阶段达到其中一种治疗方法的适应症里程碑。在这方面,个体疾病进展情况起着关键作用。在作者看来,认为所有患者都能在某个预定时间接受特定治疗的观点是错误的。因此,在这篇综述中,作者介绍了各种治疗方法对不同症状的疗效,对同时开始治疗的时间概念提出了质疑,并得出了以生活质量和参与度为重点的个体化治疗评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信