5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) loss is a marker of malignancy in biliary neoplasms.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Miguel S Gonzalez-Mancera, Andrew Siref, Kambiz Kosari, Nicholas Nissen, Srinivas Gaddam, Andrew Hendifar, Arsen Osipov, Kevin Waters, Danielle Hutchings, Maha Guindi, Brent K Larson
{"title":"5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) loss is a marker of malignancy in biliary neoplasms.","authors":"Miguel S Gonzalez-Mancera, Andrew Siref, Kambiz Kosari, Nicholas Nissen, Srinivas Gaddam, Andrew Hendifar, Arsen Osipov, Kevin Waters, Danielle Hutchings, Maha Guindi, Brent K Larson","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adenocarcinomas of the biliary tract frequently present diagnostic challenges because of their histologic overlap with benign and preinvasive lesions. The molecular profiles of biliary adenocarcinomas vary by anatomical location. Variations in IDH1/2, common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, can lead to defective production of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC). Limited ancillary studies are available for biliary adenocarcinomas, and loss of 5-hmC staining could serve as a helpful ancillary diagnostic tool for biliary tract malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 93 cases-20 benign biliary lesions, 15 preinvasive biliary neoplasms, 46 invasive biliary carcinomas, and 12 pancreatic adenocarcinomas-for 5-hmC staining. Preoperative biopsies from 16 cases of biliary carcinoma were also stained. Sixteen nonneoplastic/reactive bile duct biopsies served as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loss of 5-hmC was seen in 41 of 46 (89.1%) biliary malignancies vs 0 of 20 benign tumors (P < .001), for a sensitivity and specificity of 89.1% and 100%, respectively. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma showed loss of 5-hmC in 11 of 13 (84.6%) cases, similar to the 30 of 33 (90.9%) cases in other biliary adenocarcinomas (P = .61). Similarly, 5-hmC loss was more frequent in distal bile duct adenocarcinomas than in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, at 15 of 17 (88.2%) vs 4 of 12 (33.3%), respectively (P = .0045). There was no difference in the frequency of 5-hmC loss in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy vs those who did not (90.9% vs 88.6%, P  > .99). 5-hmC immunohistochemistry in preoperative biopsies was concordant with the resection specimen in 81.3% (13/16) of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loss of 5-hmC is not unique to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma among biliary carcinomas, but is a useful diagnostic marker differentiating malignancies of the biliary tree from benign mimics.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Adenocarcinomas of the biliary tract frequently present diagnostic challenges because of their histologic overlap with benign and preinvasive lesions. The molecular profiles of biliary adenocarcinomas vary by anatomical location. Variations in IDH1/2, common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, can lead to defective production of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC). Limited ancillary studies are available for biliary adenocarcinomas, and loss of 5-hmC staining could serve as a helpful ancillary diagnostic tool for biliary tract malignancies.

Methods: We evaluated 93 cases-20 benign biliary lesions, 15 preinvasive biliary neoplasms, 46 invasive biliary carcinomas, and 12 pancreatic adenocarcinomas-for 5-hmC staining. Preoperative biopsies from 16 cases of biliary carcinoma were also stained. Sixteen nonneoplastic/reactive bile duct biopsies served as controls.

Results: Loss of 5-hmC was seen in 41 of 46 (89.1%) biliary malignancies vs 0 of 20 benign tumors (P < .001), for a sensitivity and specificity of 89.1% and 100%, respectively. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma showed loss of 5-hmC in 11 of 13 (84.6%) cases, similar to the 30 of 33 (90.9%) cases in other biliary adenocarcinomas (P = .61). Similarly, 5-hmC loss was more frequent in distal bile duct adenocarcinomas than in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, at 15 of 17 (88.2%) vs 4 of 12 (33.3%), respectively (P = .0045). There was no difference in the frequency of 5-hmC loss in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy vs those who did not (90.9% vs 88.6%, P  > .99). 5-hmC immunohistochemistry in preoperative biopsies was concordant with the resection specimen in 81.3% (13/16) of cases.

Conclusions: Loss of 5-hmC is not unique to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma among biliary carcinomas, but is a useful diagnostic marker differentiating malignancies of the biliary tree from benign mimics.

5-羟甲基胞嘧啶(5-hmC)缺失是胆道肿瘤的恶性标志物。
目的:胆道腺癌在组织学上与良性和浸润前病变重叠,因此经常给诊断带来挑战。胆道腺癌的分子特征因解剖位置而异。IDH1/2的变异常见于肝内胆管癌,可导致5-羟甲基胞嘧啶(5-hmC)的生成缺陷。胆道腺癌的辅助研究有限,而 5-hmC 染色缺失可作为胆道恶性肿瘤的辅助诊断工具:我们评估了 93 个病例--20 个良性胆道病变、15 个浸润前胆道肿瘤、46 个浸润性胆道癌和 12 个胰腺腺癌--5-hmC 染色情况。16 例胆道癌的术前活检组织也进行了染色。16 例非肿瘤性/反应性胆管活检作为对照:结果:46 例胆道恶性肿瘤中有 41 例(89.1%)出现 5-hmC 缺失,而 20 例良性肿瘤中仅有 0 例出现 5-hmC 缺失(P .99)。在81.3%(13/16)的病例中,术前活检的5-hmC免疫组化结果与切除标本一致:结论:在胆道癌中,5-hmC缺失并非肝内胆管癌所独有,但却是区分胆管恶性肿瘤和良性模仿癌的有用诊断标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信