QuantiFERON–CMV assay by chemiluminescence immunoassay: Is it more suitable for real-live monitoring of transplant patients?

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Raquel Fernández-Moreno , Aurora Páez-Vega , Diego Rodríguez-Cano , Ana Salinas , Fernando Rodríguez-Cantalejo , Aurora Jurado , Julián Torre-Cisneros , Sara Cantisán
{"title":"QuantiFERON–CMV assay by chemiluminescence immunoassay: Is it more suitable for real-live monitoring of transplant patients?","authors":"Raquel Fernández-Moreno ,&nbsp;Aurora Páez-Vega ,&nbsp;Diego Rodríguez-Cano ,&nbsp;Ana Salinas ,&nbsp;Fernando Rodríguez-Cantalejo ,&nbsp;Aurora Jurado ,&nbsp;Julián Torre-Cisneros ,&nbsp;Sara Cantisán","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The QuantiFERON<img>CMV (QF-CMV) assay is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) used to monitor CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) by ELISA in transplant patients. However, a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) has been developed to quantify IFNG in the QuantiFERON-Tuberculosis (TB) to detect latent TB infection.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this work is to compare the results of QF-CMV by ELISA with those obtained by CLIA in an automated Liaison XL analyzer using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus reagents.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>The QF-CMV assay had been performed by ELISA in kidney and lung transplant patients between July 2019-April 2023 at the IMIBIC/Reina Sofía Hospital (Cordoba, Spain). The remaining QF-CMV supernatants had been preserved at -80 ºC from then. Now, the IFNG levels in the same samples were determined by CLIA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and three QF-CMV supernatants from kidney (<em>n</em> = 50) and lung (<em>n</em> = 53) transplant patients were selected. An agreement of 87.4 % (kappa coefficient 0.788) between CLIA and ELISA was observed. Thirteen (12.6 %) discrepant results were detected. Some Indeterminate results by ELISA converted to Non-reactive by CLIA (0.53–0.92 IU/mL for Mitogen-Nil values). Likewise, borderline Non-reactive results by ELISA were above the 0.2 IU/mL cut-off by CLIA and then were Reactive (0.21–0.31 for CMV-Nil values).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CLIA shows substantial concordance with ELISA and acceptable discrepancies. The possible higher sensitivity of CLIA returns a higher number of Reactive results, which entails potential clinical consequences. Therefore, a new threshold to confer protection against CMV infection after transplantation needs to be defined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The QuantiFERONCMV (QF-CMV) assay is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) used to monitor CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) by ELISA in transplant patients. However, a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) has been developed to quantify IFNG in the QuantiFERON-Tuberculosis (TB) to detect latent TB infection.

Objectives

The aim of this work is to compare the results of QF-CMV by ELISA with those obtained by CLIA in an automated Liaison XL analyzer using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus reagents.

Study Design

The QF-CMV assay had been performed by ELISA in kidney and lung transplant patients between July 2019-April 2023 at the IMIBIC/Reina Sofía Hospital (Cordoba, Spain). The remaining QF-CMV supernatants had been preserved at -80 ºC from then. Now, the IFNG levels in the same samples were determined by CLIA.

Results

One hundred and three QF-CMV supernatants from kidney (n = 50) and lung (n = 53) transplant patients were selected. An agreement of 87.4 % (kappa coefficient 0.788) between CLIA and ELISA was observed. Thirteen (12.6 %) discrepant results were detected. Some Indeterminate results by ELISA converted to Non-reactive by CLIA (0.53–0.92 IU/mL for Mitogen-Nil values). Likewise, borderline Non-reactive results by ELISA were above the 0.2 IU/mL cut-off by CLIA and then were Reactive (0.21–0.31 for CMV-Nil values).

Conclusion

CLIA shows substantial concordance with ELISA and acceptable discrepancies. The possible higher sensitivity of CLIA returns a higher number of Reactive results, which entails potential clinical consequences. Therefore, a new threshold to confer protection against CMV infection after transplantation needs to be defined.

通过化学发光免疫测定法进行 QuantiFERON-CMV 检测:它更适合对移植患者进行实时监测吗?
背景定量FERONCMV(QF-CMV)测定是一种干扰素-γ释放测定(IGRA),用于通过ELISA监测移植患者的CMV特异性细胞介导免疫(CMV-CMI)。然而,目前已开发出一种化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)来定量检测定量FERON-Tuberculosis(TB)中的IFNG,以检测潜伏肺结核感染。这项工作的目的是比较在自动Liaison XL分析仪上使用定量FERON-TB Gold Plus试剂通过ELISA检测QF-CMV和通过CLIA检测QF-CMV的结果。研究设计2019年7月至2023年4月期间,西班牙科尔多瓦IMIBIC/Reina Sofía医院通过ELISA法对肾移植和肺移植患者进行了QF-CMV检测。此后,剩余的QF-CMV上清液一直保存在-80 ºC。结果 从肾移植患者(50 人)和肺移植患者(53 人)的 QF-CMV 上清中筛选出 103 份样本。CLIA 和 ELISA 的一致性为 87.4%(卡帕系数 0.788)。检测出 13 项(12.6%)结果不一致。ELISA 的一些不确定结果在 CLIA 中转化为非反应性结果(0.53-0.92 IU/mL,为 Mitogen-Nil 值)。同样,ELISA 检测的边缘非反应性结果在 CLIA 检测中高于 0.2 IU/mL 临界值,然后转为反应性结果(CMV-无值为 0.21-0.31)。CLIA 的灵敏度可能较高,会产生较多的反应性结果,这可能会对临床造成影响。因此,需要确定一个新的阈值,以防止移植后感染 CMV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信