What does the ‘chat’ tell us about participation and engagement in online video conferencing?

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elizabeth Stokoe , Jessica Win See Wong , Jessica Pedersen Belisle Hansen , Damian Roland , Tessa Davis
{"title":"What does the ‘chat’ tell us about participation and engagement in online video conferencing?","authors":"Elizabeth Stokoe ,&nbsp;Jessica Win See Wong ,&nbsp;Jessica Pedersen Belisle Hansen ,&nbsp;Damian Roland ,&nbsp;Tessa Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although much is known about the experiential nature of online conferencing, we know less about actual participation and engagement. This paper investigates delegate interactions in the “parallel chat” function of a video platform during an online medical education conference. We collected 813 unique messages, posted while speakers presented on a digital stage. We used descriptive statistics to summarize message/chat content in terms of participant categories and topic. 23 % of delegates posted in the chat. However, to go beyond these dimensions, we used conversation analytic methods to identify the actions accomplished in messages and their interconnectedness. We developed a coding scheme to report this analysis across the complete dataset. We found that messages mostly comprised positive assessments (“Wonderful talk!”) and appreciations (“Thank you!”). ‘Second’ messages were more common than initiations or ‘first’ messages, indicating extensive engagement between participants. Few messages received no response. Delegates also formulated what speakers said to develop ‘learning moments’ in the chat. Overall, we argue that a richer and more precise understanding of participation and engagement in video conferencing can be achieved by analysing actual participation and its content, rather than relying only on post-hoc reports and surveys. Data are in British English.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656124000114/pdfft?md5=08c153fd60cfcfba992eb87da5670acb&pid=1-s2.0-S2210656124000114-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656124000114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although much is known about the experiential nature of online conferencing, we know less about actual participation and engagement. This paper investigates delegate interactions in the “parallel chat” function of a video platform during an online medical education conference. We collected 813 unique messages, posted while speakers presented on a digital stage. We used descriptive statistics to summarize message/chat content in terms of participant categories and topic. 23 % of delegates posted in the chat. However, to go beyond these dimensions, we used conversation analytic methods to identify the actions accomplished in messages and their interconnectedness. We developed a coding scheme to report this analysis across the complete dataset. We found that messages mostly comprised positive assessments (“Wonderful talk!”) and appreciations (“Thank you!”). ‘Second’ messages were more common than initiations or ‘first’ messages, indicating extensive engagement between participants. Few messages received no response. Delegates also formulated what speakers said to develop ‘learning moments’ in the chat. Overall, we argue that a richer and more precise understanding of participation and engagement in video conferencing can be achieved by analysing actual participation and its content, rather than relying only on post-hoc reports and surveys. Data are in British English.

聊天 "对我们参与在线视频会议有何启示?
尽管我们对在线会议的体验性有很多了解,但对实际参与和投入却知之甚少。本文研究了在线医学教育会议期间代表们在视频平台 "并行聊天 "功能中的互动情况。我们收集了 813 条独特的消息,这些消息是发言人在数字舞台上演讲时发布的。我们使用描述性统计方法从与会者类别和主题方面总结了消息/聊天内容。23% 的代表在聊天中发布了信息。不过,为了超越这些维度,我们使用了会话分析方法来确定消息中完成的操作及其相互联系。我们制定了一个编码方案来报告整个数据集的分析结果。我们发现,信息大多包含积极的评价("讲得太好了!")和赞赏("谢谢!")。第二次 "信息比 "发起 "或 "第一次 "信息更常见,这表明参与者之间有广泛的接触。很少有信息没有得到回应。与会代表还对发言人的发言进行了整理,以便在聊天中形成 "学习时刻"。总之,我们认为,通过分析实际参与情况及其内容,而不是仅仅依靠事后报告和调查,可以更丰富、更准确地了解视频会议中的参与和投入情况。数据采用英式英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信