Breaking habits: safety and efficacy of elective electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the setting of day hospital.

Q2 Medicine
Ammar Brkić, Minela Bećirović, Emir Bećirović, Tarik Brkić, Esad Brkić, Denis Mršić, Amir Bećirović, Amila Jašarević, Emir Softić, Alma Mujić Ibralić
{"title":"Breaking habits: safety and efficacy of elective electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the setting of day hospital.","authors":"Ammar Brkić, Minela Bećirović, Emir Bećirović, Tarik Brkić, Esad Brkić, Denis Mršić, Amir Bećirović, Amila Jašarević, Emir Softić, Alma Mujić Ibralić","doi":"10.17392/1640-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim To examine safety and efficiency of electrocardioversion (EC) in elective treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the setting of Day Hospital by determining success rate, frequency of adverse events and possible cost benefit compared to admitting a patient into hospital. Methods This prospective observational cohort study was performed in Day Hospital and in Intensive Care Department of Internal Medicine Clinic, University Clinical Centre Tuzla from January 2019 to December 2022 and included 98 patients with a persistent form of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter. The patients who were divided in two groups, 56 hospitalized and 42 patients accessed in Day Hospital. In all patients, medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) evaluation was performed in addition to laboratory findings. Electrocardioversion was performed with a monophasic General Electric defibrillator in anterolateral electrode position with up to three repetitive shocks. Results In hospital setting group overall succes rate of electrocardioversion was 85%, with average 2.1 EC attemps, there was with one fatal outcome due to stroke, one case of ventricular fibrillation (VF) due to human error, and 6 minor adverse events; with average cost of was 1408.70 KM (720.23 €) per patient. In Day Hospital setting succes rate was 88%, with average 2 EC attempts, no major adverse events, 8 minor adverse events; and average cost was of 127.23 KM (65.05 €) per patient. Conclusion Performing elective electrocardioversion in Day Hospital setting is as safe as admitting patients into hospital but substantially more cost effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":51129,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Glasnik","volume":"21 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17392/1640-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To examine safety and efficiency of electrocardioversion (EC) in elective treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the setting of Day Hospital by determining success rate, frequency of adverse events and possible cost benefit compared to admitting a patient into hospital. Methods This prospective observational cohort study was performed in Day Hospital and in Intensive Care Department of Internal Medicine Clinic, University Clinical Centre Tuzla from January 2019 to December 2022 and included 98 patients with a persistent form of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter. The patients who were divided in two groups, 56 hospitalized and 42 patients accessed in Day Hospital. In all patients, medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) evaluation was performed in addition to laboratory findings. Electrocardioversion was performed with a monophasic General Electric defibrillator in anterolateral electrode position with up to three repetitive shocks. Results In hospital setting group overall succes rate of electrocardioversion was 85%, with average 2.1 EC attemps, there was with one fatal outcome due to stroke, one case of ventricular fibrillation (VF) due to human error, and 6 minor adverse events; with average cost of was 1408.70 KM (720.23 €) per patient. In Day Hospital setting succes rate was 88%, with average 2 EC attempts, no major adverse events, 8 minor adverse events; and average cost was of 127.23 KM (65.05 €) per patient. Conclusion Performing elective electrocardioversion in Day Hospital setting is as safe as admitting patients into hospital but substantially more cost effective.

打破习惯:日间医院心房颤动和心房扑动电复律的安全性和有效性。
目的 通过确定成功率、不良事件发生频率以及与住院治疗相比可能产生的成本效益,研究在日间医院环境下选择性治疗心房颤动和心房扑动的心电转复术(EC)的安全性和效率。方法 该前瞻性观察队列研究于 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月在图兹拉大学临床中心日间医院和内科诊所重症监护室进行,共纳入 98 名持续性心房颤动(房颤)或心房扑动患者。这些患者分为两组,56 名住院患者和 42 名在日间医院就诊的患者。除了实验室检查结果外,还对所有患者进行了病史、体格检查、心电图和经胸超声心动图评估。使用单相通用电气除颤器在前外侧电极位置进行心电复苏,最多重复冲击三次。结果 在医院环境组中,心电转复术的总体成功率为 85%,平均 2.1 次心电转复,其中 1 例因中风而死亡,1 例因人为失误导致室颤,6 例轻微不良事件;每名患者的平均费用为 1408.70 可兑换马克(720.23 欧元)。在日间医院,成功率为 88%,平均 2 次心电图尝试,无重大不良事件,8 次轻微不良事件;每位患者的平均费用为 127.23 KM(65.05 欧元)。结论 在日间医院进行心电转换与住院治疗同样安全,但成本效益更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicinski Glasnik
Medicinski Glasnik 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicinski Glasnik (MG) is the official publication (two times per year) of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton. Manuscripts that present of original basic and applied research from all fields of medicine (general and clinical practice, and basic medical sciences) are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信