Evaluation of 12-lead electrocardiogram at 0.55T for improved cardiac monitoring in magnetic resonance imaging.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aravindan Kolandaivelu, Christopher G Bruce, Felicia Seemann, Dursun Korel Yildirim, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Robert J Lederman, Daniel A Herzka
{"title":"Evaluation of 12-lead electrocardiogram at 0.55T for improved cardiac monitoring in magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Aravindan Kolandaivelu, Christopher G Bruce, Felicia Seemann, Dursun Korel Yildirim, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Robert J Lederman, Daniel A Herzka","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a standard diagnostic tool for monitoring cardiac ischemia and heart rhythm during cardiac interventional procedures and stress testing. These procedures can benefit from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) information; however, the MRI scanner magnetic field leads to ECG distortion that limits ECG interpretation. This study evaluated the potential for improved ECG interpretation in a \"low field\" 0.55T MRI scanner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 12-lead ECGs were recorded inside 0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T MRI scanners, as well as at scanner table \"home\" position in the fringe field and outside the scanner room (seven pigs). To assess interpretation of ischemic ECG changes in a 0.55T MRI scanner, ECGs were recorded before and after coronary artery occlusion (seven pigs). ECGs was also recorded for five healthy human volunteers in the 0.55T scanner. ECG error and variation were assessed over 2-minute recordings for ECG features relevant to clinical interpretation: the PR interval, QRS interval, J point, and ST segment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECG error was lower at 0.55T compared to higher field scanners. Only at 0.55T table home position, did the error approach the guideline recommended 0.025 mV ceiling for ECG distortion (median 0.03 mV). At scanner isocenter, only in the 0.55T scanner did J point error fall within the 0.1 mV threshold for detecting myocardial ischemia (median 0.03 mV in pigs and 0.06 mV in healthy volunteers). Correlation of J point deviation inside versus outside the 0.55T scanner following coronary artery occlusion was excellent at scanner table home position (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.97), and strong at scanner isocenter (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG distortion is improved in 0.55T compared to 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners. At scanner home position, ECG distortion at 0.55T is low enough that clinical interpretation appears feasible without need for more cumbersome patient repositioning. At 0.55T scanner isocenter, ST segment changes during coronary artery occlusion appear detectable but distortion is enough to obscure subtle ST segment changes that could be clinically relevant. Reduced ECG distortion in 0.55T scanners may simplify the problem of suppressing residual distortion by ECG cable positioning, averaging, and filtering and could reduce current restrictions on ECG monitoring during interventional MRI procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a standard diagnostic tool for monitoring cardiac ischemia and heart rhythm during cardiac interventional procedures and stress testing. These procedures can benefit from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) information; however, the MRI scanner magnetic field leads to ECG distortion that limits ECG interpretation. This study evaluated the potential for improved ECG interpretation in a "low field" 0.55T MRI scanner.

Methods: The 12-lead ECGs were recorded inside 0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T MRI scanners, as well as at scanner table "home" position in the fringe field and outside the scanner room (seven pigs). To assess interpretation of ischemic ECG changes in a 0.55T MRI scanner, ECGs were recorded before and after coronary artery occlusion (seven pigs). ECGs was also recorded for five healthy human volunteers in the 0.55T scanner. ECG error and variation were assessed over 2-minute recordings for ECG features relevant to clinical interpretation: the PR interval, QRS interval, J point, and ST segment.

Results: ECG error was lower at 0.55T compared to higher field scanners. Only at 0.55T table home position, did the error approach the guideline recommended 0.025 mV ceiling for ECG distortion (median 0.03 mV). At scanner isocenter, only in the 0.55T scanner did J point error fall within the 0.1 mV threshold for detecting myocardial ischemia (median 0.03 mV in pigs and 0.06 mV in healthy volunteers). Correlation of J point deviation inside versus outside the 0.55T scanner following coronary artery occlusion was excellent at scanner table home position (r2 = 0.97), and strong at scanner isocenter (r2 = 0.92).

Conclusion: ECG distortion is improved in 0.55T compared to 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners. At scanner home position, ECG distortion at 0.55T is low enough that clinical interpretation appears feasible without need for more cumbersome patient repositioning. At 0.55T scanner isocenter, ST segment changes during coronary artery occlusion appear detectable but distortion is enough to obscure subtle ST segment changes that could be clinically relevant. Reduced ECG distortion in 0.55T scanners may simplify the problem of suppressing residual distortion by ECG cable positioning, averaging, and filtering and could reduce current restrictions on ECG monitoring during interventional MRI procedures.

评估 0.55T 磁共振成像中的 12 导联心电图,以改进磁共振成像心脏监测。
背景:12 导联心电图(ECG)是在心脏介入手术和压力测试期间监测心脏缺血和心律的标准诊断工具。然而,磁共振成像(MRI)扫描仪的磁场会导致心电图失真,从而限制心电图的解读。本研究评估了在 "低磁场 "0.55T MRI 扫描仪中改进心电图解读的潜力。方法:在 0.55T、1.5T 和 3T MRI 扫描仪内,以及在边缘磁场中扫描台 "原点 "位置和扫描室外(7 头猪)记录 12 导联心电图。为了评估在 0.55T 磁共振成像扫描仪中对缺血性心电图变化的解读,在冠状动脉闭塞前后记录了心电图(7 头猪)。此外,还在 0.55T 扫描仪上记录了 5 名健康人类志愿者的心电图。在 2 分钟的记录中评估了与临床解释相关的心电图误差和变化:PR 间期、QRS 间期、J 点和 ST 段:结果:与更高磁场的扫描仪相比,0.55T 的心电图误差更小。只有在 0.55T 工作台原点位置,误差才接近指南建议的 0.025mV 心电图失真上限(中位数为 0.03mV)。在扫描仪等中心位置,只有在 0.55T 扫描仪上,J 点误差才在 0.1mV 的阈值范围内,可用于检测心肌缺血(猪的中位数为 0.03mV,健康志愿者的中位数为 0.06mV)。冠状动脉闭塞后,J 点偏差在 0.55T 扫描仪内外的相关性在扫描仪工作台原点位置非常好(r2 = 0.97),在扫描仪等中心位置非常强(r2 = 0.92):结论:与 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振成像扫描仪相比,0.55T 磁共振成像扫描仪的心电图失真有所改善。在扫描仪原点位置,0.55T 的心电图失真很低,临床解释似乎是可行的,无需对病人进行更麻烦的重新定位。在 0.55T 扫描仪等中心位置,冠状动脉闭塞时的 ST 段变化似乎可以检测到,但失真足以掩盖可能与临床相关的细微 ST 段变化。在 0.55T 扫描仪中减少心电图失真可简化通过心电图电缆定位、平均化和过滤来抑制残余失真的问题,并可减少目前在介入 MRI 程序中对心电图监测的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信