A fast in silico model for preoperative risk assessment of paravalvular leakage

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Michelle Spanjaards, Finja Borowski, Laura Supp, René Ubachs, Valentina Lavezzo, Olaf van der Sluis
{"title":"A fast in silico model for preoperative risk assessment of paravalvular leakage","authors":"Michelle Spanjaards,&nbsp;Finja Borowski,&nbsp;Laura Supp,&nbsp;René Ubachs,&nbsp;Valentina Lavezzo,&nbsp;Olaf van der Sluis","doi":"10.1007/s10237-024-01816-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In silico simulations can be used to evaluate and optimize the safety, quality, efficacy and applicability of medical devices. Furthermore, in silico modeling is a powerful tool in therapy planning to optimally tailor treatment for each patient. For this purpose, a workflow to perform fast preoperative risk assessment of paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is presented in this paper. To this end, a novel, efficient method is introduced to calculate the regurgitant volume in a simplified, but sufficiently accurate manner. A proof of concept of the method is obtained by comparison of the calculated results with results obtained from in vitro experiments. Furthermore, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to validate more complex stenosis scenarios. Comparing the simplified leakage model to CFD simulations reveals its potential for procedure planning and qualitative preoperative risk assessment of PVL. Finally, a 3D device deployment model and the efficient leakage model are combined to showcase the application of the presented leakage model, by studying the effect of stent size and the degree of stenosis on the regurgitant volume. The presented leakage model is also used to visualize the leakage path. To generalize the leakage model to a wide range of clinical applications, further validation on a large cohort of patients is needed to validate the accuracy of the model’s prediction under various patient-specific conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":"23 3","pages":"959 - 985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-024-01816-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In silico simulations can be used to evaluate and optimize the safety, quality, efficacy and applicability of medical devices. Furthermore, in silico modeling is a powerful tool in therapy planning to optimally tailor treatment for each patient. For this purpose, a workflow to perform fast preoperative risk assessment of paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is presented in this paper. To this end, a novel, efficient method is introduced to calculate the regurgitant volume in a simplified, but sufficiently accurate manner. A proof of concept of the method is obtained by comparison of the calculated results with results obtained from in vitro experiments. Furthermore, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are used to validate more complex stenosis scenarios. Comparing the simplified leakage model to CFD simulations reveals its potential for procedure planning and qualitative preoperative risk assessment of PVL. Finally, a 3D device deployment model and the efficient leakage model are combined to showcase the application of the presented leakage model, by studying the effect of stent size and the degree of stenosis on the regurgitant volume. The presented leakage model is also used to visualize the leakage path. To generalize the leakage model to a wide range of clinical applications, further validation on a large cohort of patients is needed to validate the accuracy of the model’s prediction under various patient-specific conditions.

Abstract Image

用于瓣膜旁漏术前风险评估的快速硅学模型。
硅学模拟可用于评估和优化医疗设备的安全性、质量、疗效和适用性。此外,硅学建模还是制定治疗计划的有力工具,可为每位患者量身定制最佳治疗方案。为此,本文介绍了在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后对瓣下漏(PVL)进行快速术前风险评估的工作流程。为此,本文引入了一种新颖、高效的方法,以简化但足够准确的方式计算反流容量。通过将计算结果与体外实验结果进行比较,证明了该方法的概念。此外,还使用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟来验证更复杂的狭窄情况。将简化的渗漏模型与 CFD 模拟进行比较,可以发现其在手术规划和 PVL 术前定性风险评估方面的潜力。最后,通过研究支架尺寸和狭窄程度对反流容量的影响,将三维设备部署模型和高效泄漏模型相结合,展示了所提出的泄漏模型的应用。所提出的渗漏模型还用于可视化渗漏路径。为了将泄漏模型推广到广泛的临床应用中,还需要对大量患者进行进一步验证,以验证模型在各种患者特定条件下预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信