Comparative assessment of high-risk cardiovascular medication knowledge between practising and student nurses: a descriptive multi-centre study.

Q2 Medicine
Najla Taslim, Amal Turikham Alghamdi, Dana Ali Alqarni, Shaista Rashid, Dustin Todd Edge
{"title":"Comparative assessment of high-risk cardiovascular medication knowledge between practising and student nurses: a descriptive multi-centre study.","authors":"Najla Taslim, Amal Turikham Alghamdi, Dana Ali Alqarni, Shaista Rashid, Dustin Todd Edge","doi":"10.17392/1659-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim To examine unexplored knowledge of cardiovascular highrisk medications and perception thereof among practising nurses and students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods The multicentre cross-sectional quantitative study used an online survey dichotomised into a knowledge test (true/false and multiple choice questions) and a perception assessment (closed-ended questions). Four hundred and eighteen nurses participated in the study. Results In the knowledge test, 19 (4.5%) participants scored high (≥71%), while 83 (19.8%) and 316 (75.5%) demonstrated moderate (score ≥51-70%) and poor performance (score ≤50%), respectively. In a comparative analysis, the knowledge level of staff nurses was significantly higher than the students but not the other nurses' cohort. Nurses' specialty and region of KSA were strongly associated with the knowledge level. Emergency room nurses and those belonging to the eastern region of KSA exhibited higher knowledge levels than other subgroups. A vast majority of nurses, 128 (30.6 %), rated their knowledge of medicines as somewhat sufficient, while quoting insufficient knowledge 226 (54.1%) as the major cause of medication errors. Three hundred and sixteen (75%) nurses expressed interest in undergoing specialised training in high-alert medication-based therapy preferably in a classroom setting by 279 (66.7%). Conclusion This study revealed a marked knowledge deficit in high-risk cardiovascular drugs among nurses. The pharmacological curriculum in nursing schools should be tailored to be clinically oriented and reinforced with problem-based learning. Continued pharmacology education focusing on high-risk drugs should be implemented among nurses to safeguard patient lives by mitigating the risks of medication error.</p>","PeriodicalId":51129,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Glasnik","volume":"21 1","pages":"166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17392/1659-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To examine unexplored knowledge of cardiovascular highrisk medications and perception thereof among practising nurses and students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods The multicentre cross-sectional quantitative study used an online survey dichotomised into a knowledge test (true/false and multiple choice questions) and a perception assessment (closed-ended questions). Four hundred and eighteen nurses participated in the study. Results In the knowledge test, 19 (4.5%) participants scored high (≥71%), while 83 (19.8%) and 316 (75.5%) demonstrated moderate (score ≥51-70%) and poor performance (score ≤50%), respectively. In a comparative analysis, the knowledge level of staff nurses was significantly higher than the students but not the other nurses' cohort. Nurses' specialty and region of KSA were strongly associated with the knowledge level. Emergency room nurses and those belonging to the eastern region of KSA exhibited higher knowledge levels than other subgroups. A vast majority of nurses, 128 (30.6 %), rated their knowledge of medicines as somewhat sufficient, while quoting insufficient knowledge 226 (54.1%) as the major cause of medication errors. Three hundred and sixteen (75%) nurses expressed interest in undergoing specialised training in high-alert medication-based therapy preferably in a classroom setting by 279 (66.7%). Conclusion This study revealed a marked knowledge deficit in high-risk cardiovascular drugs among nurses. The pharmacological curriculum in nursing schools should be tailored to be clinically oriented and reinforced with problem-based learning. Continued pharmacology education focusing on high-risk drugs should be implemented among nurses to safeguard patient lives by mitigating the risks of medication error.

执业护士和在校护士对高危心血管药物知识的比较评估:一项描述性多中心研究。
目的 探讨沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)执业护士和学生对心血管高危药物的认知情况。方法 该多中心横断面定量研究采用在线调查的方式,分为知识测试(真/假和多项选择题)和认知评估(封闭式问题)。共有 418 名护士参加了研究。结果 在知识测试中,19 名参与者(4.5%)得分较高(≥71%),83 名(19.8%)和 316 名(75.5%)分别表现为中等(得分≥51-70%)和较差(得分≤50%)。通过比较分析,职员护士的知识水平明显高于学生,但不高于其他护士群体。护士的专业和金沙萨地区与知识水平密切相关。急诊室护士和属于金沙萨东部地区的护士的知识水平高于其他分组。绝大多数护士(128 人,占 30.6%)认为自己的药物知识略显不足,而认为知识不足是导致用药错误的主要原因的有 226 人(占 54.1%)。有 316 名护士(75%)表示有兴趣接受以高度警觉为基础的药物治疗方面的专门培训,其中 279 名护士(66.7%)希望在课堂上接受培训。结论 本研究显示,护士在高危心血管药物方面的知识明显不足。护士学校的药理学课程应该以临床为导向,并以问题为基础加强学习。应在护士中持续开展以高风险药物为重点的药理学教育,通过降低用药错误的风险来保障患者的生命安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicinski Glasnik
Medicinski Glasnik 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicinski Glasnik (MG) is the official publication (two times per year) of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton. Manuscripts that present of original basic and applied research from all fields of medicine (general and clinical practice, and basic medical sciences) are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信