Deep plowing increases soil water storage and wheat yield in a semiarid region of Loess Plateau in China: A simulation study

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xinrui Shi , Chao Li , Ping Li , Yuzheng Zong , Dongsheng Zhang , Zhiqiang Gao , Xingyu Hao , Jing Wang , Shu Kee Lam
{"title":"Deep plowing increases soil water storage and wheat yield in a semiarid region of Loess Plateau in China: A simulation study","authors":"Xinrui Shi ,&nbsp;Chao Li ,&nbsp;Ping Li ,&nbsp;Yuzheng Zong ,&nbsp;Dongsheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Gao ,&nbsp;Xingyu Hao ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Shu Kee Lam","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Rational tillage practice is critical for increasing soil water storage capacity and improving crop production in semiarid areas with uneven rainfall distribution.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aims of this study are to examine the effects of fallow tillage practice on wheat yield, soil water storage and water use efficiency, to investigate the appropriateness of different tillage practices under varying precipitation conditions, and to identify key factors contributing to yield variations among these practices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here we compared the effects of different tillage practices (deep plowing, DP; subsoiling tillage, ST; and shallow rotary tillage, RT) on soil water storage and winter wheat yield in a semiarid region of the Loess Plateau in China, using field experimental data from 2009 to 2014 and APSIM (Agriculture Production System sIMulator) simulation results from 1980–2018.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The APSIM well simulated the soil water storage (0–200 cm), phenology, biomass and yield of winter wheat, with R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.65 and 0.71 for each variable in calibration years and validation years, and nRMSE &lt;16.9 % and 22.1 %, respectively, indicating a good correlation and medium consistency between simulated and measured values. The simulated average annual soil water storage, biomass, yield, and water use efficiency under DP were 8.4 %, 18.4 %, 25.5 %, and 22.3 % higher than under RT, and 7.9 %, 13.8 %, 22.4 %, and 21.4 % higher than under ST, respectively. These variables did not differ between ST and RT treatments. Compared to RT, DP improved the soil water storage by 9.0 %–12.0 % from October to March, increased by 4.8 %–7.1 % during the fallow period, and increased by 2.5 %–7.4 % from April to June. This was mainly because DP had more precipitation reserves during the fallow period, but in the later stage of wheat growth, as precipitation increased, the difference in soil water storage between different tillage practices decreased. Wheat yield, precipitation and soil water storage were significantly and positively correlated. The difference in yield between DP and RT was greater at the medium than at low and high yield production levels, but that between ST and RT was not significant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DP increased soil water storage from October to March and improved wheat yield, which should be recommended to ensure high wheat yield and efficient water use in the Loess Plateau.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This study validated the applicability of DP tillage in semi-arid areas on a long-term scale and found its superiority at different yield production levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Article 109299"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024000522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Rational tillage practice is critical for increasing soil water storage capacity and improving crop production in semiarid areas with uneven rainfall distribution.

Objective

The aims of this study are to examine the effects of fallow tillage practice on wheat yield, soil water storage and water use efficiency, to investigate the appropriateness of different tillage practices under varying precipitation conditions, and to identify key factors contributing to yield variations among these practices.

Methods

Here we compared the effects of different tillage practices (deep plowing, DP; subsoiling tillage, ST; and shallow rotary tillage, RT) on soil water storage and winter wheat yield in a semiarid region of the Loess Plateau in China, using field experimental data from 2009 to 2014 and APSIM (Agriculture Production System sIMulator) simulation results from 1980–2018.

Results

The APSIM well simulated the soil water storage (0–200 cm), phenology, biomass and yield of winter wheat, with R2 > 0.65 and 0.71 for each variable in calibration years and validation years, and nRMSE <16.9 % and 22.1 %, respectively, indicating a good correlation and medium consistency between simulated and measured values. The simulated average annual soil water storage, biomass, yield, and water use efficiency under DP were 8.4 %, 18.4 %, 25.5 %, and 22.3 % higher than under RT, and 7.9 %, 13.8 %, 22.4 %, and 21.4 % higher than under ST, respectively. These variables did not differ between ST and RT treatments. Compared to RT, DP improved the soil water storage by 9.0 %–12.0 % from October to March, increased by 4.8 %–7.1 % during the fallow period, and increased by 2.5 %–7.4 % from April to June. This was mainly because DP had more precipitation reserves during the fallow period, but in the later stage of wheat growth, as precipitation increased, the difference in soil water storage between different tillage practices decreased. Wheat yield, precipitation and soil water storage were significantly and positively correlated. The difference in yield between DP and RT was greater at the medium than at low and high yield production levels, but that between ST and RT was not significant.

Conclusion

DP increased soil water storage from October to March and improved wheat yield, which should be recommended to ensure high wheat yield and efficient water use in the Loess Plateau.

Implications

This study validated the applicability of DP tillage in semi-arid areas on a long-term scale and found its superiority at different yield production levels.

深耕可增加中国黄土高原半干旱地区的土壤蓄水量和小麦产量:模拟研究
目的 本研究旨在考察休耕对小麦产量、土壤蓄水量和水分利用效率的影响,研究不同耕作方式在不同降水条件下的适宜性,并找出导致不同耕作方式产量差异的关键因素。方法 我们利用 2009 年至 2014 年的田间试验数据和 1980 年至 2018 年的 APSIM(农业生产系统模拟器)模拟结果,比较了中国黄土高原半干旱地区不同耕作方式(深耕,DP;底耕,ST;浅旋耕,RT)对土壤蓄水和冬小麦产量的影响。结果APSIM很好地模拟了冬小麦的土壤蓄水量(0-200 cm)、物候期、生物量和产量,各变量在校准年和验证年的R2分别为0.65和0.71,nRMSE分别为16.9%和22.1%,表明模拟值与实测值之间具有良好的相关性和中等的一致性。DP模拟的年平均土壤储水量、生物量、产量和水分利用效率分别比RT高8.4%、18.4%、25.5%和22.3%,比ST高7.9%、13.8%、22.4%和21.4%。这些变量在 ST 和 RT 处理之间没有差异。与 RT 相比,DP 在 10 月至 3 月的土壤储水量提高了 9.0 %-12.0 %,休耕期提高了 4.8 %-7.1 %,4 月至 6 月提高了 2.5 %-7.4 %。这主要是因为在休耕期,DP 的降水储备较多,但在小麦生长后期,随着降水量的增加,不同耕作方式的土壤储水量差异减小。小麦产量、降水量和土壤储水量呈显著正相关。结论 DP 增加了 10 月至次年 3 月的土壤蓄水量,提高了小麦产量,为确保黄土高原地区小麦高产和高效用水,应推荐使用这种耕作方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信