The role of technology in reading literacy: Is Sweden going back or moving forward by returning to paper-based reading?

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Brayan Díaz , Miguel Nussbaum , Samuel Greiff , Macarena Santana
{"title":"The role of technology in reading literacy: Is Sweden going back or moving forward by returning to paper-based reading?","authors":"Brayan Díaz ,&nbsp;Miguel Nussbaum ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff ,&nbsp;Macarena Santana","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The announcement of a progressive decrease in digitalization and the reintroduction of paper-based reading and traditional pedagogical methods in Swedish schools has initiated a worldwide debate on the uses of technology for reading in schools. This debate led us to examine the role and effects of technology on reading skills. We initiated the present research by analyzing the integration of technology practices mediated by technology in the context of reading and then expanded into a broader discussion encompassing the pedagogical implications. By reviewing the current literature, three venues of technology usage were identified: assessment, teaching reading using technology, and general uses of technology. Through the assessment lens, there is limited support for reverting to paper-based reading assessments. Four meta-analyses indicated that reading comprehension scores tend to be slightly higher in paper-based formats than on digital devices when the same text is used, but for all students, the same difference is observed. The effectiveness of using technology to teach reading comprehension is relative to the pedagogical approach employed and the specific design of the technology. The evidence indicates that well-designed digital books outperform paper-based reading. Additionally, student-centered practices using technology are associated with higher reading performance rather than reinforcing reading practices. Policy initiatives should proactively support schools and teachers in establishing student-centered technology integration practices. Finally, the extensive data available from the PISA test were widely employed to explore the impact of ICT usage on students' overall performance, yielding contradictory results explained by differences in culture, context, and teacher training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 105014"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524000289","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The announcement of a progressive decrease in digitalization and the reintroduction of paper-based reading and traditional pedagogical methods in Swedish schools has initiated a worldwide debate on the uses of technology for reading in schools. This debate led us to examine the role and effects of technology on reading skills. We initiated the present research by analyzing the integration of technology practices mediated by technology in the context of reading and then expanded into a broader discussion encompassing the pedagogical implications. By reviewing the current literature, three venues of technology usage were identified: assessment, teaching reading using technology, and general uses of technology. Through the assessment lens, there is limited support for reverting to paper-based reading assessments. Four meta-analyses indicated that reading comprehension scores tend to be slightly higher in paper-based formats than on digital devices when the same text is used, but for all students, the same difference is observed. The effectiveness of using technology to teach reading comprehension is relative to the pedagogical approach employed and the specific design of the technology. The evidence indicates that well-designed digital books outperform paper-based reading. Additionally, student-centered practices using technology are associated with higher reading performance rather than reinforcing reading practices. Policy initiatives should proactively support schools and teachers in establishing student-centered technology integration practices. Finally, the extensive data available from the PISA test were widely employed to explore the impact of ICT usage on students' overall performance, yielding contradictory results explained by differences in culture, context, and teacher training.

技术在阅读素养中的作用:回归纸质阅读,瑞典是在倒退还是前进?
瑞典学校宣布逐步减少数字化,重新采用纸质阅读和传统教学方法,这引发了世界范围内关于在学校阅读中使用技术的讨论。这场辩论促使我们研究技术对阅读技能的作用和影响。我们首先分析了以技术为媒介的技术实践在阅读方面的整合,然后展开了更广泛的讨论,包括教学方面的影响。通过回顾现有文献,我们确定了技术使用的三个方面:评估、使用技术进行阅读教学以及技术的一般使用。从评估的角度来看,对恢复纸质阅读评估的支持有限。四项荟萃分析表明,在使用相同文本的情况下,纸质格式的阅读理解得分往往略高于数字设备,但对所有学生而言,观察到的差异是相同的。使用技术进行阅读理解教学的有效性与所采用的教学方法和技术的具体设计有关。有证据表明,精心设计的数字图书优于纸质阅读。此外,以学生为中心的技术实践与更高的阅读成绩相关,而不是强化阅读实践。政策措施应积极支持学校和教师建立以学生为中心的技术整合实践。最后,国际学生评估项目(PISA)测试的大量数据被广泛用于探讨信息和通信技术的使用对学生总体成绩的影响,但由于文化、背景和教师培训的差异,产生了相互矛盾的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信