The Amager Project IV: suicidal behavior and aftercare: real world data (RWD) from a prospective observational project.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2024.2315163
August G Wang, Titia Lahoz, Marianne Hvid, Heidi K Grufstedt, Lene M Jørgensen
{"title":"The Amager Project IV: suicidal behavior and aftercare: real world data (RWD) from a prospective observational project.","authors":"August G Wang, Titia Lahoz, Marianne Hvid, Heidi K Grufstedt, Lene M Jørgensen","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2315163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In an RCT study, OPAC (outreach, problem solving, adherence, continuity) approach to aftercare after suicide attempts had an effect. The present study used the OPAC method in a clinical setting on Amager Copenhagen to patients after suicide attempt (Group 1) and patients with suicide ideation (Group 2) in a real-world data (RWD) study.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To study whether the OPAC method could provide real world evidence (RWE) for results from the RCT study and long-time prospects.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This RWD study included 506 patients and followed them for 5 years. Kaplan-Meyer showed 5 years results. Risk factors for 5 years were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>206 males (mean age 37.9) and 300 females (mean age 35.2) participated. A decline in survival accelerated after 3 years. After a 2-year follow-up, Group 1 had an attempted suicide rate of 12,2% and Group 2 5,4%. After 5 years the numbers were 18% and 10%. There were 3 completed suicides. Risk factors were: earlier suicide attempts, one or both parents or they themselves were alcohol/drug abusers, and a poor social network. Group 1 showed the same result as the intervention group in our earlier RCT study. Group 2 did better. Both groups did better than the control group from our RCT study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OPAC effect was translated into the daily clinic. Risk factors were previous suicide attempts, alcohol and drug abuse and poor social networks. More specific therapy is needed for some patients to prevent relapse. Focus on enhancing a sense of belongingness and/or treating substance abuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"267-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2315163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In an RCT study, OPAC (outreach, problem solving, adherence, continuity) approach to aftercare after suicide attempts had an effect. The present study used the OPAC method in a clinical setting on Amager Copenhagen to patients after suicide attempt (Group 1) and patients with suicide ideation (Group 2) in a real-world data (RWD) study.

Aim: To study whether the OPAC method could provide real world evidence (RWE) for results from the RCT study and long-time prospects.

Method: This RWD study included 506 patients and followed them for 5 years. Kaplan-Meyer showed 5 years results. Risk factors for 5 years were calculated.

Results: 206 males (mean age 37.9) and 300 females (mean age 35.2) participated. A decline in survival accelerated after 3 years. After a 2-year follow-up, Group 1 had an attempted suicide rate of 12,2% and Group 2 5,4%. After 5 years the numbers were 18% and 10%. There were 3 completed suicides. Risk factors were: earlier suicide attempts, one or both parents or they themselves were alcohol/drug abusers, and a poor social network. Group 1 showed the same result as the intervention group in our earlier RCT study. Group 2 did better. Both groups did better than the control group from our RCT study.

Conclusion: The OPAC effect was translated into the daily clinic. Risk factors were previous suicide attempts, alcohol and drug abuse and poor social networks. More specific therapy is needed for some patients to prevent relapse. Focus on enhancing a sense of belongingness and/or treating substance abuse.

阿马格项目IV:自杀行为与善后护理:前瞻性观察项目的真实世界数据(RWD)。
研究背景在一项RCT研究中,OPAC(外展、问题解决、坚持、持续)方法对自杀未遂后的善后护理产生了效果。本研究在一项真实世界数据(RWD)研究中,在阿马格-哥本哈根的临床环境中对自杀未遂患者(第一组)和有自杀意念患者(第二组)使用了 OPAC 方法:这项 RWD 研究纳入了 506 名患者,并对他们进行了为期 5 年的随访。Kaplan-Meyer 显示了 5 年的结果。结果:206 名男性(平均年龄 37.9 岁)和 300 名女性(平均年龄 35.2 岁)参加了研究。3 年后,存活率加速下降。随访 2 年后,第一组的自杀未遂率为 12.2%,第二组为 5.4%。5 年后,该比例分别为 18% 和 10%。有 3 人自杀身亡。风险因素包括:自杀未遂、父母一方或双方或他们自己酗酒/吸毒,以及社交网络较差。第一组的结果与我们之前的 RCT 研究中的干预组相同。第二组的情况更好。结论:OPAC 的效果已转化为对儿童的影响:结论:OPAC 的效果已在日常门诊中得到体现。自杀未遂、酗酒和滥用药物以及社交网络不健全是自杀的危险因素。需要为部分患者提供更具针对性的治疗,以防止复发。重点是增强归属感和/或治疗药物滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信