Reliability and Validity of a Multidimensional Measure of Subjective Community Well-Being.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1177/10731911241229060
R Noah Padgett, Matthew T Lee, Renae Wilkinson, Heather Tsavaris, Tyler J VanderWeele
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of a Multidimensional Measure of Subjective Community Well-Being.","authors":"R Noah Padgett, Matthew T Lee, Renae Wilkinson, Heather Tsavaris, Tyler J VanderWeele","doi":"10.1177/10731911241229060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An individual's flourishing is sustained by and dependent on their community's well-being. We provide one of the first studies of a measure of communal subjective well-being, focusing on individuals' relationships with their community. Using two samples from the Greater Columbus, Ohio region, we provide evidence of the reliability and validity of the Subjective Community Well-being (SCWB) assessment. The five domains of the SCWB are Good Relationships (α = .92), Proficient Leadership (α = .93), Healthy Practices (α = .92), Satisfying Community (α = .88), and Strong Mission (α = .81). A community-based sample (<i>N</i> = 1,435) and an online sample of Columbus residents (<i>N</i> = 692) were scored on the SCWB and compared across domains. We found evidence that the SCWB scores differentiate between active and less active community members. We discuss the appropriate uses of the SCWB as a measure of well-being and provide recommendations for research that could profitably utilize the SCWB measure to examine community well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1658-1673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241229060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An individual's flourishing is sustained by and dependent on their community's well-being. We provide one of the first studies of a measure of communal subjective well-being, focusing on individuals' relationships with their community. Using two samples from the Greater Columbus, Ohio region, we provide evidence of the reliability and validity of the Subjective Community Well-being (SCWB) assessment. The five domains of the SCWB are Good Relationships (α = .92), Proficient Leadership (α = .93), Healthy Practices (α = .92), Satisfying Community (α = .88), and Strong Mission (α = .81). A community-based sample (N = 1,435) and an online sample of Columbus residents (N = 692) were scored on the SCWB and compared across domains. We found evidence that the SCWB scores differentiate between active and less active community members. We discuss the appropriate uses of the SCWB as a measure of well-being and provide recommendations for research that could profitably utilize the SCWB measure to examine community well-being.

社区主观幸福感多维测量的可靠性和有效性。
个人的兴旺发达离不开社区的福祉。我们对社区主观幸福感的测量方法进行了首次研究,重点关注个人与社区的关系。我们利用俄亥俄州大哥伦布地区的两个样本,证明了社区主观幸福感(SCWB)评估的可靠性和有效性。SCWB 的五个领域是:良好的关系(α = .92)、精通的领导(α = .93)、健康的实践(α = .92)、满意的社区(α = .88)和强大的使命(α = .81)。我们对社区样本(样本数 = 1,435)和哥伦布市居民在线样本(样本数 = 692)进行了 SCWB 测评,并对不同领域进行了比较。我们发现有证据表明,SCWB 分数可以区分活跃和不太活跃的社区成员。我们讨论了将 SCWB 作为幸福感衡量标准的适当用途,并为利用 SCWB 衡量标准考察社区幸福感的研究提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信