A Systematic Review on the Genetic Contribution to Tinnitus.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Patricia Perez-Carpena, Jose A Lopez-Escamez, Álvaro Gallego-Martinez
{"title":"A Systematic Review on the Genetic Contribution to Tinnitus.","authors":"Patricia Perez-Carpena, Jose A Lopez-Escamez, Álvaro Gallego-Martinez","doi":"10.1007/s10162-024-00925-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the available evidence to support a genetic contribution and define the role of common and rare variants in tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a systematic search and quality assessment, 31 records including 383,063 patients were selected (14 epidemiological studies and 17 genetic association studies). General information on the sample size, age, sex, tinnitus prevalence, severe tinnitus distribution, and sensorineural hearing loss was retrieved. Studies that did not include data on hearing assessment were excluded. Relative frequencies were used for qualitative variables to compare different studies and to obtain average values. Genetic variants and genes were listed and clustered according to their potential role in tinnitus development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average prevalence of tinnitus estimated from population-based studies was 26.3% for any tinnitus, and 20% of patients with tinnitus reported it as an annoying symptom. One study has reported population-specific differences in the prevalence of tinnitus, the white ancestry being the population with a higher prevalence. Genome-wide association studies have identified and replicated two common variants in the Chinese population (rs2846071; rs4149577) in the intron of TNFRSF1A, associated with noise-induced tinnitus. Moreover, gene burden analyses in sequencing data from Spanish and Swede patients with severe tinnitus have identified and replicated ANK2, AKAP9, and TSC2 genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The genetic contribution to tinnitus is starting to be revealed and it shows population-specific effects in European and Asian populations. The common allelic variants associated with tinnitus that showed replication are associated with noise-induced tinnitus. Although severe tinnitus has been associated with rare variants with large effect, their role on hearing or hyperacusis has not been established.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"13-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10907330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00925-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the available evidence to support a genetic contribution and define the role of common and rare variants in tinnitus.

Methods: After a systematic search and quality assessment, 31 records including 383,063 patients were selected (14 epidemiological studies and 17 genetic association studies). General information on the sample size, age, sex, tinnitus prevalence, severe tinnitus distribution, and sensorineural hearing loss was retrieved. Studies that did not include data on hearing assessment were excluded. Relative frequencies were used for qualitative variables to compare different studies and to obtain average values. Genetic variants and genes were listed and clustered according to their potential role in tinnitus development.

Results: The average prevalence of tinnitus estimated from population-based studies was 26.3% for any tinnitus, and 20% of patients with tinnitus reported it as an annoying symptom. One study has reported population-specific differences in the prevalence of tinnitus, the white ancestry being the population with a higher prevalence. Genome-wide association studies have identified and replicated two common variants in the Chinese population (rs2846071; rs4149577) in the intron of TNFRSF1A, associated with noise-induced tinnitus. Moreover, gene burden analyses in sequencing data from Spanish and Swede patients with severe tinnitus have identified and replicated ANK2, AKAP9, and TSC2 genes.

Conclusions: The genetic contribution to tinnitus is starting to be revealed and it shows population-specific effects in European and Asian populations. The common allelic variants associated with tinnitus that showed replication are associated with noise-induced tinnitus. Although severe tinnitus has been associated with rare variants with large effect, their role on hearing or hyperacusis has not been established.

关于耳鸣遗传因素的系统性综述。
目的:评估支持遗传因素的现有证据,并确定常见和罕见变异在耳鸣中的作用:方法:经过系统搜索和质量评估,共筛选出 31 项记录,包括 383,063 名患者(14 项流行病学研究和 17 项遗传关联研究)。检索了有关样本量、年龄、性别、耳鸣患病率、严重耳鸣分布和感音神经性听力损失的一般信息。未包含听力评估数据的研究被排除在外。定性变量采用相对频率来比较不同的研究并得出平均值。根据基因变异和基因在耳鸣发生中的潜在作用,列出了基因变异和基因:基于人口的研究估计,任何耳鸣的平均发病率为 26.3%,20% 的耳鸣患者称耳鸣是一种恼人的症状。一项研究报告了耳鸣发病率的人群特异性差异,其中白人血统的耳鸣发病率较高。全基因组关联研究在中国人群中发现并复制了 TNFRSF1A 内含子上的两个常见变体(rs2846071 和 rs4149577),这两个变体与噪声引起的耳鸣有关。此外,通过对西班牙和瑞典严重耳鸣患者的测序数据进行基因负担分析,发现并复制了ANK2、AKAP9和TSC2基因:结论:耳鸣的遗传因素已开始被揭示,并在欧洲和亚洲人群中显示出特定的人群效应。与耳鸣有关的常见等位基因变异也与噪声引起的耳鸣有关。虽然严重耳鸣与影响较大的罕见变异有关,但这些变异对听力或耳鸣的作用尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信