The roles of social information, asocial information, and initial bias in nest-building decisions.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1037/com0000374
Benjamin A Whittaker, Gopika Balasubramanian, Andrés Camacho-Alpízar, Connor T Lambert, Lauren M Guillette
{"title":"The roles of social information, asocial information, and initial bias in nest-building decisions.","authors":"Benjamin A Whittaker, Gopika Balasubramanian, Andrés Camacho-Alpízar, Connor T Lambert, Lauren M Guillette","doi":"10.1037/com0000374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals can use asocial (e.g., environmental cues) or social (e.g., conspecific behavior) information when making decisions. We investigated decisions made by zebra finches when asocial and social sources conveyed agreeing or conflicting information, and assessed the influence of initial bias on decision making. Finches completed an initial preference test ranking preference for three colors of nest-building material. Birds in the agree group (<i>n</i> = 14) then observed demonstrators build nests using nonpreferred color material (social information) that matched the environment color (asocial information). Birds in the conflict group (<i>n</i> = 15) observed demonstrators build nests with nonpreferred color material that did not match the cage environment (another nonpreferred color). A final preference test assessed any changes in color preference. The agree group reduced average preference for their initially preferred color, but did not significantly increase average preference for the asocial/social colors. The conflict group also reduced average preference for the initially preferred color and also increased preference for the socially demonstrated color. Observers with stronger initial bias were less likely to choose the socially demonstrated color than observers with weaker initial bias. This shows that social information informs nest-building decisions, even when in conflict with asocial information. However, bias influences social information use and adds nuance to how different individuals use information when making decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals can use asocial (e.g., environmental cues) or social (e.g., conspecific behavior) information when making decisions. We investigated decisions made by zebra finches when asocial and social sources conveyed agreeing or conflicting information, and assessed the influence of initial bias on decision making. Finches completed an initial preference test ranking preference for three colors of nest-building material. Birds in the agree group (n = 14) then observed demonstrators build nests using nonpreferred color material (social information) that matched the environment color (asocial information). Birds in the conflict group (n = 15) observed demonstrators build nests with nonpreferred color material that did not match the cage environment (another nonpreferred color). A final preference test assessed any changes in color preference. The agree group reduced average preference for their initially preferred color, but did not significantly increase average preference for the asocial/social colors. The conflict group also reduced average preference for the initially preferred color and also increased preference for the socially demonstrated color. Observers with stronger initial bias were less likely to choose the socially demonstrated color than observers with weaker initial bias. This shows that social information informs nest-building decisions, even when in conflict with asocial information. However, bias influences social information use and adds nuance to how different individuals use information when making decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

社会信息、非社会信息和初始偏差在筑巢决策中的作用。
动物在做决定时可以使用非社会信息(如环境线索)或社会信息(如同种动物的行为)。我们研究了斑马雀在非社会信息源和社会信息源传递一致或冲突信息时做出的决策,并评估了初始偏差对决策的影响。斑马雀完成了一项初始偏好测试,对三种颜色的筑巢材料进行了偏好排序。然后,同意组的鸟类(n = 14)观察示范者使用与环境颜色(非社会信息)相匹配的非偏好颜色材料(社会信息)筑巢。冲突组(n = 15)的鸟儿观察示范者使用与笼子环境不匹配的非偏好颜色材料(另一种非偏好颜色)筑巢。最后的偏好测试评估了颜色偏好的变化。同意组降低了对其最初偏好颜色的平均偏好,但对非社交/社交颜色的平均偏好并没有显著增加。冲突组也降低了对最初偏好颜色的平均偏好,但也增加了对社会表现颜色的偏好。与初始偏好较弱的观察者相比,初始偏好较强的观察者不太可能选择社会展示的颜色。这表明,即使社会信息与非社会信息相冲突,社会信息也会影响筑巢决策。然而,偏见会影响社会信息的使用,并使不同个体在决策时使用信息的方式更加微妙。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信