Prediction of early falls using adherence and balance assessments in a convalescent rehabilitation ward.

Fujita Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.20407/fmj.2022-037
Toshio Teranishi, Megumi Suzuki, Masayuki Yamada, Akiko Maeda, Motomi Yokota, Naoki Itoh, Masanori Tanimoto, Aiko Osawa, Izumi Kondo
{"title":"Prediction of early falls using adherence and balance assessments in a convalescent rehabilitation ward.","authors":"Toshio Teranishi, Megumi Suzuki, Masayuki Yamada, Akiko Maeda, Motomi Yokota, Naoki Itoh, Masanori Tanimoto, Aiko Osawa, Izumi Kondo","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2022-037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To predict falls by adding an adherence assessment to a static balance ability assessment, and to evaluate fall prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 416 patients who were admitted to a 45-bed convalescent rehabilitation ward over a 2-year period. The patients were assessed at the time of admission using the Standing Test for Imbalance and Disequilibrium (SIDE) and three additional, newly developed adherence items. Patients were divided into two groups: a group that experienced falls (fall group) and a group that did not experience falls (non-fall group) within 14 days of admission. The sensitivity and specificity of the assessment items for predicting falls were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity was 0.86 and specificity was 0.42 when the cutoff was between SIDE levels 0-2a and 2b-4. Combining balance assessment using the SIDE with the memory and instruction adherence items improved fall prediction accuracy such that the sensitivity was 0.75 and the specificity was 0.64.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis suggested that adherence assessment can improve fall risk prediction accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10847636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2022-037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To predict falls by adding an adherence assessment to a static balance ability assessment, and to evaluate fall prediction accuracy.

Methods: This study included 416 patients who were admitted to a 45-bed convalescent rehabilitation ward over a 2-year period. The patients were assessed at the time of admission using the Standing Test for Imbalance and Disequilibrium (SIDE) and three additional, newly developed adherence items. Patients were divided into two groups: a group that experienced falls (fall group) and a group that did not experience falls (non-fall group) within 14 days of admission. The sensitivity and specificity of the assessment items for predicting falls were calculated.

Results: Sensitivity was 0.86 and specificity was 0.42 when the cutoff was between SIDE levels 0-2a and 2b-4. Combining balance assessment using the SIDE with the memory and instruction adherence items improved fall prediction accuracy such that the sensitivity was 0.75 and the specificity was 0.64.

Conclusions: Our analysis suggested that adherence assessment can improve fall risk prediction accuracy.

利用疗养康复病房中的依从性和平衡评估预测早期跌倒。
目的通过在静态平衡能力评估的基础上增加坚持性评估来预测跌倒,并评估跌倒预测的准确性:这项研究包括 416 名患者,他们在两年时间里住进了拥有 45 张床位的疗养康复病房。患者在入院时接受了站立失衡和不平衡测试(SIDE)以及另外三个新开发的坚持项目的评估。患者被分为两组:一组在入院 14 天内发生过跌倒(跌倒组),另一组在入院 14 天内未发生过跌倒(未跌倒组)。计算了评估项目预测跌倒的灵敏度和特异性:将使用 SIDE 进行的平衡评估与记忆和指导依从性项目相结合,提高了跌倒预测的准确性,使灵敏度达到 0.75,特异度达到 0.64:我们的分析表明,依从性评估可以提高跌倒风险预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信