[Safety of robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for invasive stereo-EEG monitoring].

Q4 Medicine
I M Alekseev, Zh Zh Pekov, N V Pedyash, A A Zuev
{"title":"[Safety of robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for invasive stereo-EEG monitoring].","authors":"I M Alekseev, Zh Zh Pekov, N V Pedyash, A A Zuev","doi":"10.17116/neiro20248801128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for stereo-EEG monitoring has become popular in recent years in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there are still few data on safety of this technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence of complications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the results of implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes in 187 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients underwent non-invasive preoperative examination (video-EEG, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG). In case of insufficient data, stereo-EEG monitoring was prescribed. We determined electrode insertion trajectory using a robotic station and MR images. Implantation of electrodes was carried out using a Rosa robot (Medtech, France). All patients underwent invasive EEG monitoring after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 11.25±3 electrodes per a patient. Implantation of one electrode took 7.5±4.9 min. Postoperative MRI revealed electrode malposition in 2.3% of cases. None was associated with complications. The complication rate per electrode was 0.6%. Complications affected stereo-EEG monitoring only in 3 cases (1.6%). The mortality rate was 0.5%. Bilateral implantation (<i>p</i>=0.005), insular (<i>p</i>=0.040) and occipital (<i>p</i>=0.045) deep electrode implantation were associated with lower incidence of complications. Longer duration of the procedure influenced the incidence of electrode placement in the lateral ventricle (<i>p</i>=0.028), and implantation in the frontal lobe was more often associated with epidural placement of electrodes (<i>p</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes is a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Rare electrode malposition does not usually affect invasive monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248801128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for stereo-EEG monitoring has become popular in recent years in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there are still few data on safety of this technique.

Objective: To assess the incidence of complications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes.

Material and methods: We retrospectively studied the results of implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes in 187 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients underwent non-invasive preoperative examination (video-EEG, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG). In case of insufficient data, stereo-EEG monitoring was prescribed. We determined electrode insertion trajectory using a robotic station and MR images. Implantation of electrodes was carried out using a Rosa robot (Medtech, France). All patients underwent invasive EEG monitoring after implantation.

Results: There were 11.25±3 electrodes per a patient. Implantation of one electrode took 7.5±4.9 min. Postoperative MRI revealed electrode malposition in 2.3% of cases. None was associated with complications. The complication rate per electrode was 0.6%. Complications affected stereo-EEG monitoring only in 3 cases (1.6%). The mortality rate was 0.5%. Bilateral implantation (p=0.005), insular (p=0.040) and occipital (p=0.045) deep electrode implantation were associated with lower incidence of complications. Longer duration of the procedure influenced the incidence of electrode placement in the lateral ventricle (p=0.028), and implantation in the frontal lobe was more often associated with epidural placement of electrodes (p=0.039).

Conclusion: Robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes is a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Rare electrode malposition does not usually affect invasive monitoring.

[机器人辅助植入深部电极进行有创立体电子脑电图监测的安全性]。
近年来,机器人辅助植入深部电极进行立体脑电图监测已在耐药性癫痫患者中流行起来。然而,有关该技术安全性的数据仍然很少:评估耐药性癫痫患者在接受机器人辅助下植入立体电子脑电图电极时并发症的发生率:我们对187名耐药性癫痫患者的立体EEG电极植入结果进行了回顾性研究。所有患者均接受了非侵入性术前检查(视频脑电图、核磁共振成像、正电子发射计算机断层显像、脑电图)。在数据不足的情况下,我们对患者进行了立体电子脑电图监测。我们使用机器人工作站和核磁共振图像确定电极植入轨迹。电极植入采用 Rosa 机器人(法国 Medtech 公司)。所有患者在植入后都接受了有创脑电图监测:每名患者有 11.25±3 个电极。植入一个电极耗时(7.5±4.9)分钟。术后核磁共振成像显示,2.3%的病例存在电极错位。无一例出现并发症。每个电极的并发症发生率为 0.6%。只有 3 例患者(1.6%)的并发症影响了立体 EEG 监测。死亡率为 0.5%。双侧电极植入(p=0.005)、岛状电极植入(p=0.040)和枕状电极植入(p=0.045)与较低的并发症发生率有关。手术时间越长,侧脑室电极植入的发生率越高(p=0.028),额叶电极植入多与硬膜外电极植入有关(p=0.039):结论:机器人辅助立体电子脑电图电极植入术是一种安全的手术,并发症风险极低。结论:机器人辅助立体定向脑电图电极植入术是一种安全的手术,并发症风险极低。罕见的电极错位通常不会影响有创监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信