Current role of intraoperative cell salvage techniques in the management of renal tumors with level III and IV inferior vena cava thrombus extension.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2024-02-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872241229248
Cristian Surcel, Robert Dotzauer, Cristian Mirvald, Calin Popa, Cosmin Olariu, Catalin Baston, Mihai Harza, Constantin Gangu, Igor Tsaur, Ioanel Sinescu
{"title":"Current role of intraoperative cell salvage techniques in the management of renal tumors with level III and IV inferior vena cava thrombus extension.","authors":"Cristian Surcel, Robert Dotzauer, Cristian Mirvald, Calin Popa, Cosmin Olariu, Catalin Baston, Mihai Harza, Constantin Gangu, Igor Tsaur, Ioanel Sinescu","doi":"10.1177/17562872241229248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>En bloc removal of the kidney with tumor thrombus excision in a multidisciplinary team remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus extension. In order to minimize the hemodynamic impact of the surgical blood loss, intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) techniques can decrease the need for allogeneic blood and prevent blood transfusion related complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this article, we evaluated the safety of IOCS during radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass with or without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.</p><p><strong>Design and method: </strong>In this retrospective comparative multicenter analysis, clinical characteristics of 27 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with or without IOCS between 2012 and 2022 in three referral care units were collected into a database. The need for an allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) was also recorded, defined as any transfusion that occurred either intraoperatively or during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The need for ABT in the cell saver arm was significantly smaller due to the reinfusion of rescued blood (<i>p</i> < 0.015). In multivariate analysis, no cell saver usage was an independent predictor for complications ⩾3 Clavien 3a [odds ratio (OR) 18.71, 95% CI 1.056-331.703, <i>p</i> = 0.046]. No usage of IOCS was an independent predictor for a lower risk of death (OR 0.277, 95% CI 0.062-0.825, <i>p</i> = 0.024). During follow-up, patients who received salvaged blood did not experience an increased risk for developing local recurrence or distant metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transfusion of autologous blood is safe and can be using during nephrectomy and thrombectomy for advanced RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562872241229248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10851714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241229248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: En bloc removal of the kidney with tumor thrombus excision in a multidisciplinary team remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus extension. In order to minimize the hemodynamic impact of the surgical blood loss, intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) techniques can decrease the need for allogeneic blood and prevent blood transfusion related complications.

Objective: In this article, we evaluated the safety of IOCS during radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass with or without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Design and method: In this retrospective comparative multicenter analysis, clinical characteristics of 27 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with or without IOCS between 2012 and 2022 in three referral care units were collected into a database. The need for an allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) was also recorded, defined as any transfusion that occurred either intraoperatively or during the hospital stay.

Results: The need for ABT in the cell saver arm was significantly smaller due to the reinfusion of rescued blood (p < 0.015). In multivariate analysis, no cell saver usage was an independent predictor for complications ⩾3 Clavien 3a [odds ratio (OR) 18.71, 95% CI 1.056-331.703, p = 0.046]. No usage of IOCS was an independent predictor for a lower risk of death (OR 0.277, 95% CI 0.062-0.825, p = 0.024). During follow-up, patients who received salvaged blood did not experience an increased risk for developing local recurrence or distant metastases.

Conclusion: Transfusion of autologous blood is safe and can be using during nephrectomy and thrombectomy for advanced RCC.

术中细胞挽救技术在治疗伴有 III 和 IV 级下腔静脉血栓扩展的肾肿瘤中的当前作用。
背景:在多学科团队的合作下进行肾脏全切并切除肿瘤血栓仍是治疗肿瘤血栓扩展的肾细胞癌(RCC)的标准方法。为了将手术失血对血流动力学的影响降至最低,术中细胞挽救(IOCS)技术可减少对异体血的需求,并预防输血相关并发症:本文评估了在有或无深低温循环停滞的心肺旁路下进行根治性肾切除术合并下腔静脉血栓切除术时使用 IOCS 的安全性:在这项多中心回顾性对比分析中,数据库收集了2012年至2022年期间在三家转诊医疗机构接受IOCS手术或未接受IOCS手术的27例连续患者的临床特征。同时还记录了异体输血(ABT)需求,即术中或住院期间发生的任何输血:结果:由于重新输注了抢救血液,细胞保存者治疗组的异体输血需求明显减少(P = 0.046]。未使用 IOCS 是降低死亡风险的独立预测因素(OR 0.277,95% CI 0.062-0.825,P = 0.024)。在随访期间,接受挽救血液的患者发生局部复发或远处转移的风险并没有增加:结论:输注自体血是安全的,可在晚期RCC肾切除术和血栓切除术中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信