Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li
{"title":"Prevention of Dialysis Catheter Malfunction with Urokinase and Heparin: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.
Methods: We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.
Results: In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.
Conclusion: Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.