Biphasic Rapid Culture in Differential Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Xiao-Hong Rui, Juan Wu, Fan Tu, Lu Zhou, Ying-Ying Zhang, Jun Liu
{"title":"Biphasic Rapid Culture in Differential Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.","authors":"Xiao-Hong Rui, Juan Wu, Fan Tu, Lu Zhou, Ying-Ying Zhang, Jun Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early intervention and treatment are key measures for tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control, making early, rapid, and accurate diagnostic methods crucial. The Liquid-solid (Biphasic) rapid cultures is a novel tool for the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study intended to evaluate the value of the biphasic cultures by comparing it to the acid-fast staining and liquid cultures, which have been the traditional gold-standard technology, to determine its value in the diagnosis of TB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The research team conducted an experimental study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place at the Affiliated Wuxi Fifth Hospital of Jiangnan University in Wuxi, China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were 221 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis who had been admitted to the hospital between July 2020 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Using three methods-liquid-solid (biphasic) culture, acid-fast staining, and mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 liquid culture, the research team tested participants' sputum samples: (1) for sensitivity; (2) for time to positive culture results, and (3) for differential diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biphasic culture's sensitivity was significantly higher than that of acid-fast staining, (P = .0003), and no significant difference existed between it and the MGIT 960 liquid cultures. The biphasic cultures's mean time to positivity was significantly shorter than that of the MGIT 960 liquid culture at the intervals 11-20 d (P < .0001) and 21-35 days (P = .0001). Moreover, the biphasic cultures could preliminarily differentiate nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), which is a significant advantage in tuberculosis diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential of a biphasic culture as a reliable tool for the rapid differential diagnosis of tuberculosis, with a faster detection cycle and a higher sensitivity than conventional methods. The biphasic cultures is a valuable addition to the tuberculosis diagnostic armamentarium and can help improve patients' outcomes by enabling earlier diagnosis and treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Early intervention and treatment are key measures for tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control, making early, rapid, and accurate diagnostic methods crucial. The Liquid-solid (Biphasic) rapid cultures is a novel tool for the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Objective: The study intended to evaluate the value of the biphasic cultures by comparing it to the acid-fast staining and liquid cultures, which have been the traditional gold-standard technology, to determine its value in the diagnosis of TB.

Design: The research team conducted an experimental study.

Setting: The study took place at the Affiliated Wuxi Fifth Hospital of Jiangnan University in Wuxi, China.

Participants: Participants were 221 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis who had been admitted to the hospital between July 2020 and December 2021.

Outcome measures: Using three methods-liquid-solid (biphasic) culture, acid-fast staining, and mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 liquid culture, the research team tested participants' sputum samples: (1) for sensitivity; (2) for time to positive culture results, and (3) for differential diagnosis.

Results: The biphasic culture's sensitivity was significantly higher than that of acid-fast staining, (P = .0003), and no significant difference existed between it and the MGIT 960 liquid cultures. The biphasic cultures's mean time to positivity was significantly shorter than that of the MGIT 960 liquid culture at the intervals 11-20 d (P < .0001) and 21-35 days (P = .0001). Moreover, the biphasic cultures could preliminarily differentiate nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), which is a significant advantage in tuberculosis diagnosis.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of a biphasic culture as a reliable tool for the rapid differential diagnosis of tuberculosis, with a faster detection cycle and a higher sensitivity than conventional methods. The biphasic cultures is a valuable addition to the tuberculosis diagnostic armamentarium and can help improve patients' outcomes by enabling earlier diagnosis and treatments.

结核病鉴别诊断中的双相快速培养法。
背景:早期干预和治疗是预防和控制结核病(TB)的关键措施,因此早期、快速和准确的诊断方法至关重要。液固(双相)快速培养法是鉴别诊断结核病的一种新工具:本研究旨在评估双相培养法的价值,将其与传统的金标准技术--酸-牢固染色法和液体培养法进行比较,以确定其在结核病诊断中的价值:研究小组进行了一项实验研究:研究地点:中国无锡江南大学附属无锡第五医院:结果测量:研究小组采用三种方法--液固(双相)培养法、酸-牢度染色法和分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)960液体培养法,对参与者的痰标本进行检测:(1) 灵敏度;(2) 培养结果呈阳性的时间;(3) 鉴别诊断:结果:双相培养的灵敏度明显高于酸-牢度染色(P = 0.0003),与 MGIT 960 液体培养之间无明显差异。在 11-20 天(P < .0001)和 21-35 天(P = .0001)之间,双相培养物的平均阳性时间明显短于 MGIT 960 液体培养物。此外,双相培养能初步区分非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)和结核分枝杆菌(MTB),这在结核病诊断中是一大优势:本研究强调了双相培养作为快速鉴别诊断结核病的可靠工具的潜力,与传统方法相比,其检测周期更快,灵敏度更高。双相培养是肺结核诊断手段的重要补充,有助于通过早期诊断和治疗改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信