Assessing Susceptibility to Carbon Dioxide Gas in Three Rat Strains Using the Loss of Righting Reflex.

Dexter R Merenick, Brittany A Munro, Julia M Gee, Daniel Sj Pang
{"title":"Assessing Susceptibility to Carbon Dioxide Gas in Three Rat Strains Using the Loss of Righting Reflex.","authors":"Dexter R Merenick, Brittany A Munro, Julia M Gee, Daniel Sj Pang","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Overdose of carbon dioxide gas (CO₂) is a common euthanasia method for rodents; however, CO₂ exposure activates nociceptors in rats at concentrations equal to or greater than 37% and is reported to be painful in humans at concentrations equal to or greater than 32.5%. Exposure of rats to CO₂ could cause pain before loss of consciousness. We used 2 standardized loss of righting reflex (LORR) methods to identify CO₂ concentrations associated with unconsciousness in Wistar, Long???Evans, and Sprague???Dawley rats (n = 28 animals per strain). A rotating, motorized cylinder was used to test LORR while the rat was being exposed to increasing concentrations of CO₂. LORR was defined based on a 15-second observation period. The 2 methods were 1) a 1-Paw assessment (the righting reflex was considered to be present if one or more paws contacted the cylinder after the rat was positioned in dorsal recumbency), and 2) a 4-Paw assessment (the righting reflex was considered to be present if all 4 paws contacted the cylinder after the rat was positioned in dorsal recumbency). Data were analyzed with Probit regression, and dose-response curves were plotted. 1-Paw EC<sub>95</sub> values (CO₂ concentration at which LORR occurred for 95% of the population) were Wistar, 27.2%; Long???Evans, 29.2%; and Sprague???Dawley, 35.0%. 4-Paw EC<sub>95</sub> values were Wistar, 26.2%; Long???Evans, 25.9%, and Sprague???Dawley, 31.1%. Sprague???Dawley EC<sub>95</sub> values were significantly higher in both 1- and 4-Paw tests as compared with Wistar and Long???Evans rats. No differences were detected between sexes for any strain. The 1-Paw EC<sub>95</sub> was significantly higher than the 4-Paw EC<sub>95</sub> only for Sprague-Dawley rats. These results suggest that a low number of individual rats from the strains studied may experience pain during CO₂ euthanasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"310-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overdose of carbon dioxide gas (CO₂) is a common euthanasia method for rodents; however, CO₂ exposure activates nociceptors in rats at concentrations equal to or greater than 37% and is reported to be painful in humans at concentrations equal to or greater than 32.5%. Exposure of rats to CO₂ could cause pain before loss of consciousness. We used 2 standardized loss of righting reflex (LORR) methods to identify CO₂ concentrations associated with unconsciousness in Wistar, Long???Evans, and Sprague???Dawley rats (n = 28 animals per strain). A rotating, motorized cylinder was used to test LORR while the rat was being exposed to increasing concentrations of CO₂. LORR was defined based on a 15-second observation period. The 2 methods were 1) a 1-Paw assessment (the righting reflex was considered to be present if one or more paws contacted the cylinder after the rat was positioned in dorsal recumbency), and 2) a 4-Paw assessment (the righting reflex was considered to be present if all 4 paws contacted the cylinder after the rat was positioned in dorsal recumbency). Data were analyzed with Probit regression, and dose-response curves were plotted. 1-Paw EC95 values (CO₂ concentration at which LORR occurred for 95% of the population) were Wistar, 27.2%; Long???Evans, 29.2%; and Sprague???Dawley, 35.0%. 4-Paw EC95 values were Wistar, 26.2%; Long???Evans, 25.9%, and Sprague???Dawley, 31.1%. Sprague???Dawley EC95 values were significantly higher in both 1- and 4-Paw tests as compared with Wistar and Long???Evans rats. No differences were detected between sexes for any strain. The 1-Paw EC95 was significantly higher than the 4-Paw EC95 only for Sprague-Dawley rats. These results suggest that a low number of individual rats from the strains studied may experience pain during CO₂ euthanasia.

利用丧失向右转反射评估三种大鼠对二氧化碳气体的敏感性
过量使用二氧化碳气体(CO₂)是一种常见的啮齿动物安乐死方法;然而,当 CO₂ 的浓度大于或等于 37% 时,会激活大鼠的痛觉感受器;据报道,当 CO₂ 的浓度大于或等于 32.5% 时,人类会感到疼痛。将大鼠暴露于 CO₂ 中可能会在失去知觉前引起疼痛。我们使用两种标准化的丧失右反射(LORR)方法来确定与 Wistar、Long-Evans 和 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠(每个品系 28 只)失去知觉相关的 CO₂ 浓度。在大鼠暴露于浓度不断升高的 CO₂ 时,使用一个旋转的电动圆筒来测试 LORR。LORR 的定义基于 15 秒的观察时间。这两种方法分别是:1)单爪评估(大鼠背卧后,如果一只或多只爪子接触到圆筒,则认为存在向右转反射);2)四爪评估(大鼠背卧后,如果四只爪子都接触到圆筒,则认为存在向右转反射)。采用 Probit 回归法分析数据,并绘制剂量反应曲线。1 爪 EC95 值(95% 的大鼠出现 LORR 的 CO₂ 浓度)分别为:Wistar,27.2%;Long-Evans,29.2%;Sprague-Dawley,35.0%。4爪EC95值为:Wistar,26.2%;Long-Evans,25.9%;Sprague-Dawley,31.1%。与 Wistar 大鼠和 Long-Evans 大鼠相比,Sprague-Dawley 大鼠在 1 爪和 4 爪测试中的 EC95 值明显较高。在任何品系中,均未发现性别差异。只有 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠的 1 爪 EC95 值明显高于 4 爪 EC95 值。这些结果表明,在所研究的品系中,可能有少数个体大鼠在 CO₂ 安乐死时会感到疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信