Randomized trial of mechanotherapy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Urology Pub Date : 2024-02-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562872241228023
Nissrine Nakib, Suzette Sutherland, Kevin Hallman, Marcus Mianulli, David R Boulware
{"title":"Randomized trial of mechanotherapy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.","authors":"Nissrine Nakib, Suzette Sutherland, Kevin Hallman, Marcus Mianulli, David R Boulware","doi":"10.1177/17562872241228023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) presents as unintentional urine leakage associated with activities. It significantly affects quality of life (QoL) and is the most common type of incontinence in women. Current treatment options, particularly non-surgical therapies, are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of mechanotherapy provided by the Flyte<sup>®</sup> intra-vaginal device during pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Flyte is a repeat use device for conditioning and strengthening the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). It provides two-part mechanotherapy. Part 1 is the stretching and preloading of the PFM from the internal wand. Part 2 integrates mechanical pulses which elicit muscle cellular and tissue level responses that trigger cellular regeneration, improve neuromuscular facilitation and motor learning. Subjects used the device for 5 min/day for 12 weeks. Subjects (144) were randomized and evaluated at 6 and 12 weeks. Arm A (72) received both Part 1 and Part 2 mechanotherapy for 12 weeks, whereas Arm B (72) received Part 1 therapy for 6 weeks, then crossed over to full therapy. Mean age was 50, 49, respectively, prior pelvic/abdominal surgery 26%, 46%, and previous incontinence treatments 13%, 22%. The primary endpoint was 24-h pad weight (24-HR PW) at 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were 24-HR PW at 12 weeks and QoL [International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Part 1 therapy had a greater than anticipated therapeutic effect. Thus, the study was underpowered to identify differences between study arms. Therefore, data were pooled to assess the effects of mechanotherapy. Twenty four-HR PW was significantly reduced at 6 weeks (<i>p</i> = <0.0001), with further reduction from 6 to 12 weeks (<i>p</i> = <0.0001). Data were stratified based on 24-HR PW severity. Significant reductions were noted in all severity groups (mild <i>p</i> = <0.0001, moderate <i>p</i> = <0.0001, severe <i>p</i> = <0.01). QoL was similarly improved at 6 weeks (ICIQ <i>p</i> = <0.0001, IQOL <i>p</i> = <0.0001), and 12 weeks (ICIQ <i>p</i> = <0.0001, IQOL <i>p</i> = <0.0001). Compliance was >80% at 6 weeks and 70% at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-part mechanotherapy significantly improved 24-HR PW and QoL across all severities of SUI. Improvements were noted in as little as 2 weeks and appeared to be sustained through 2-year follow up.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on ClinTrials.gov (NCT02954042).</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562872241228023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10848796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872241228023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) presents as unintentional urine leakage associated with activities. It significantly affects quality of life (QoL) and is the most common type of incontinence in women. Current treatment options, particularly non-surgical therapies, are lacking.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of mechanotherapy provided by the Flyte® intra-vaginal device during pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT).

Design: This was a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.

Materials and methods: Flyte is a repeat use device for conditioning and strengthening the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). It provides two-part mechanotherapy. Part 1 is the stretching and preloading of the PFM from the internal wand. Part 2 integrates mechanical pulses which elicit muscle cellular and tissue level responses that trigger cellular regeneration, improve neuromuscular facilitation and motor learning. Subjects used the device for 5 min/day for 12 weeks. Subjects (144) were randomized and evaluated at 6 and 12 weeks. Arm A (72) received both Part 1 and Part 2 mechanotherapy for 12 weeks, whereas Arm B (72) received Part 1 therapy for 6 weeks, then crossed over to full therapy. Mean age was 50, 49, respectively, prior pelvic/abdominal surgery 26%, 46%, and previous incontinence treatments 13%, 22%. The primary endpoint was 24-h pad weight (24-HR PW) at 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were 24-HR PW at 12 weeks and QoL [International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL)].

Results: Part 1 therapy had a greater than anticipated therapeutic effect. Thus, the study was underpowered to identify differences between study arms. Therefore, data were pooled to assess the effects of mechanotherapy. Twenty four-HR PW was significantly reduced at 6 weeks (p = <0.0001), with further reduction from 6 to 12 weeks (p = <0.0001). Data were stratified based on 24-HR PW severity. Significant reductions were noted in all severity groups (mild p = <0.0001, moderate p = <0.0001, severe p = <0.01). QoL was similarly improved at 6 weeks (ICIQ p = <0.0001, IQOL p = <0.0001), and 12 weeks (ICIQ p = <0.0001, IQOL p = <0.0001). Compliance was >80% at 6 weeks and 70% at 12 weeks.

Conclusion: Two-part mechanotherapy significantly improved 24-HR PW and QoL across all severities of SUI. Improvements were noted in as little as 2 weeks and appeared to be sustained through 2-year follow up.

Trial registration: Registered on ClinTrials.gov (NCT02954042).

机械疗法治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机试验。
背景:压力性尿失禁(SUI)表现为与活动相关的意外漏尿。它严重影响生活质量(QoL),是女性最常见的尿失禁类型。目前缺乏治疗方案,尤其是非手术疗法:评估 Flyte® 阴道内装置在盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)过程中提供的机械疗法的疗效:设计:这是一项随机、对照、双盲试验:Flyte 是一种用于调节和增强盆底肌肉(PFMs)的重复使用设备。它提供两部分机械疗法。第一部分是通过内部魔杖对盆底肌进行拉伸和预压。第 2 部分整合了机械脉冲,可引起肌肉细胞和组织水平的反应,从而触发细胞再生,改善神经肌肉促进和运动学习。受试者每天使用该装置 5 分钟,持续 12 周。受试者(144 人)被随机分配,并在 6 周和 12 周时接受评估。A组(72人)接受第一部分和第二部分机械疗法,为期12周;B组(72人)接受第一部分疗法,为期6周,然后转为全面疗法。平均年龄分别为 50 岁和 49 岁,曾接受过盆腔/腹部手术的比例分别为 26% 和 46%,曾接受过尿失禁治疗的比例分别为 13% 和 22%。主要终点是 6 周后的 24 小时尿垫重量(24-HR PW)。次要终点是 12 周时的 24-HR PW 和 QoL [国际尿失禁咨询问卷 (ICIQ)、尿失禁生活质量 (IQOL)]:结果:第一部分疗法的治疗效果高于预期。结果:第一部分疗法的治疗效果超出预期,因此,该研究的力量不足以确定研究臂之间的差异。因此,对数据进行了汇总,以评估机械疗法的效果。6周时,24-HR PW明显减少(6周时减少80%,12周时减少70%):结论:两部分机械疗法可明显改善所有严重程度 SUI 的 24-HR PW 和 QoL。试验注册:试验注册:已在 ClinTrials.gov (NCT02954042) 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Urology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of urology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in urology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest across all areas of urology, including treatment of urological disorders, with a focus on emerging pharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信