Efficacy of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oral nutritional supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.23876/j.krcp.23.146
Jae Hyeon Park, Jae Yoon Park, Geum Sil Lee, Ran-Hui Cha
{"title":"Efficacy of intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and oral nutritional supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jae Hyeon Park, Jae Yoon Park, Geum Sil Lee, Ran-Hui Cha","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.23.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcopenia is common in hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of simultaneous nutritional support and intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to the control group, the protein group (25 g of protein at every dialysis session), the NMES group (intradialytic NMES to quadriceps femoris muscles), and the NMES + P group (NMES with protein supplementation). The primary outcome was the difference in hand grip strength (HGS) and leg muscle strength (LMS) among groups. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance (the 10-m walk test and the timed up and go test [TUG]), and questionnaires about quality of life (QoL), physical activity, and depression. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed by dividing NMES and NMES + P groups into high- and low-intensity NMES groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine patients completed all the study outcomes. There was no difference in muscle strength (HGS and LMS) and muscle mass among groups. Gait speed improved in NMES and NMES + P groups. Subscale scores for QoL (kidney disease effect, role limitations due to physical or emotional problems, and overall health ratings) improved in the NMES + P group. In subgroup analysis, LMS and TUG improved only in the high-intensity NMES group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, NMES and-/or- protein supplementation did not make a significant difference in HGS and LMS. However, NMES or NMES + P improved functional capacity and QoL. Furthermore, higher NMES was superior in improving LMS and functional capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"288-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.23.146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is common in hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of simultaneous nutritional support and intradialytic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: We performed a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to the control group, the protein group (25 g of protein at every dialysis session), the NMES group (intradialytic NMES to quadriceps femoris muscles), and the NMES + P group (NMES with protein supplementation). The primary outcome was the difference in hand grip strength (HGS) and leg muscle strength (LMS) among groups. Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical performance (the 10-m walk test and the timed up and go test [TUG]), and questionnaires about quality of life (QoL), physical activity, and depression. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed by dividing NMES and NMES + P groups into high- and low-intensity NMES groups.

Results: Fifty-nine patients completed all the study outcomes. There was no difference in muscle strength (HGS and LMS) and muscle mass among groups. Gait speed improved in NMES and NMES + P groups. Subscale scores for QoL (kidney disease effect, role limitations due to physical or emotional problems, and overall health ratings) improved in the NMES + P group. In subgroup analysis, LMS and TUG improved only in the high-intensity NMES group.

Conclusion: In this study, NMES and-/or- protein supplementation did not make a significant difference in HGS and LMS. However, NMES or NMES + P improved functional capacity and QoL. Furthermore, higher NMES was superior in improving LMS and functional capacity.

血液透析患者椎管内神经肌肉电刺激和口服营养补充剂的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验。
背景:肌肉疏松症在血液透析患者中很常见。本研究旨在评估血液透析患者同时接受营养支持和椎管内神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)的效果:我们进行了一项为期 12 周的多中心随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到对照组、蛋白质组(每次透析时摄入 25 克蛋白质)、NMES 组(对股四头肌进行椎管内 NMES)和 NMES + P 组(补充蛋白质的 NMES)。主要结果是各组间手部握力(HGS)和腿部肌肉力量(LMS)的差异。次要结果包括身体成分、体能表现(10 米步行测试和定时起立行走测试 [TUG])以及有关生活质量(QoL)、体能活动和抑郁的问卷调查。此外,通过将 NMES 组和 NMES + P 组分为高强度 NMES 组和低强度 NMES 组进行了亚组分析:结果:59 名患者完成了所有研究结果。各组的肌肉力量(HGS 和 LMS)和肌肉质量没有差异。NMES组和NMES+P组的步速有所提高。NMES + P 组的 QoL 子量表评分(肾病影响、身体或情绪问题导致的角色限制以及总体健康评分)有所改善。在分组分析中,只有高强度 NMES 组的 LMS 和 TUG 有所改善:结论:在这项研究中,补充 NMES 和/或蛋白质对 HGS 和 LMS 的改善效果并不明显。然而,NMES 或 NMES + P 可改善功能能力和 QoL。此外,较高的 NMES 在改善 LMS 和功能能力方面更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信