Hemodynamic effects of noradrenaline in neonatal septic shock: a prospective cohort study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Aditya Kallimath, Reema Garegrat, Suprabha Patnaik, Yogen Singh, Naharmal B Soni, Pradeep Suryawanshi
{"title":"Hemodynamic effects of noradrenaline in neonatal septic shock: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Aditya Kallimath, Reema Garegrat, Suprabha Patnaik, Yogen Singh, Naharmal B Soni, Pradeep Suryawanshi","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of neonatal septic shock in low-income countries is 26.8% with a mortality rate of 35.4%. The evidence of the hemodynamic effects of noradrenaline in neonates remains sparse. This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of noradrenaline in neonates with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center prospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital's level III neonatal intensive care unit. Neonates with septic shock and those who received noradrenaline as a first-line vasoactive agent were included. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after one hour of noradrenaline infusion. The primary outcomes were: response at the end of one hour after starting noradrenaline infusion and mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 babies were analyzed. The cohort comprised 17 preterm neonates. The mean age of presentation with septic shock was 74.3 h. Resolution of shock at one hour after starting noradrenaline was achieved in 76.2% of cases. The median duration of hospital stay was 14 days. The mean blood pressure improved after the initiation of noradrenaline from 30.6 mm of Hg [standard deviation (SD) 6.1] to 37.8 mm of Hg (SD 8.22, p < 0.001). Fractional shortening improved after noradrenaline initiation from 29% (SD 13.5) to 45.1% (SD 21.1, p < 0.001). The mortality rate was 28.6% in our study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noradrenaline is a potential drug for use in neonatal septic shock, with improvement in mean blood pressure and fractional shortening; however, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings before it can be recommended as first-line therapy in neonatal septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmae001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of neonatal septic shock in low-income countries is 26.8% with a mortality rate of 35.4%. The evidence of the hemodynamic effects of noradrenaline in neonates remains sparse. This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of noradrenaline in neonates with septic shock.

Methods: This was a single-center prospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital's level III neonatal intensive care unit. Neonates with septic shock and those who received noradrenaline as a first-line vasoactive agent were included. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after one hour of noradrenaline infusion. The primary outcomes were: response at the end of one hour after starting noradrenaline infusion and mortality rate.

Results: A total of 21 babies were analyzed. The cohort comprised 17 preterm neonates. The mean age of presentation with septic shock was 74.3 h. Resolution of shock at one hour after starting noradrenaline was achieved in 76.2% of cases. The median duration of hospital stay was 14 days. The mean blood pressure improved after the initiation of noradrenaline from 30.6 mm of Hg [standard deviation (SD) 6.1] to 37.8 mm of Hg (SD 8.22, p < 0.001). Fractional shortening improved after noradrenaline initiation from 29% (SD 13.5) to 45.1% (SD 21.1, p < 0.001). The mortality rate was 28.6% in our study.

Conclusion: Noradrenaline is a potential drug for use in neonatal septic shock, with improvement in mean blood pressure and fractional shortening; however, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings before it can be recommended as first-line therapy in neonatal septic shock.

去甲肾上腺素对新生儿脓毒性休克血流动力学的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:在低收入国家,新生儿脓毒性休克的发病率为 26.8%,死亡率为 35.4%。有关去甲肾上腺素对新生儿血液动力学影响的证据仍然很少。本研究旨在评估去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克新生儿的影响:这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究,在一家三级甲等医院的新生儿重症监护室进行。研究对象包括脓毒性休克新生儿和接受去甲肾上腺素作为一线血管活性药物的新生儿。在输注去甲肾上腺素一小时前后记录了临床和血液动力学参数。主要结果是:开始输注去甲肾上腺素一小时后的反应和死亡率:共对 21 名婴儿进行了分析。结果:共分析了 21 名婴儿,其中包括 17 名早产新生儿。脓毒性休克的平均发病年龄为 74.3 小时。76.2%的病例在开始使用去甲肾上腺素一小时后休克得到缓解。住院时间的中位数为 14 天。开始使用诺拉肾上腺素后,平均血压从 30.6 毫米汞柱(标准差(SD)6.1)升至 37.8 毫米汞柱(SD 8.22,P 结论:诺拉肾上腺素是一种潜在的治疗脓毒性休克的药物:诺拉肾上腺素是一种可用于新生儿脓毒性休克的潜在药物,可改善平均血压和分数缩短率;然而,在推荐诺拉肾上腺素作为新生儿脓毒性休克的一线治疗药物之前,还需要进一步开展样本量更大的研究,以证实我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信