Process models of verbal memory in cancer survivors: Bayesian process modeling approach to variation in test scores.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ruben D Potthoff, Sanne B Schagen, Joost A Agelink van Rentergem
{"title":"Process models of verbal memory in cancer survivors: Bayesian process modeling approach to variation in test scores.","authors":"Ruben D Potthoff, Sanne B Schagen, Joost A Agelink van Rentergem","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2024.2313256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Verbal memory is a complex and fundamental aspect of human cognition. However, traditional sum-score analyses of verbal learning tests oversimplify underlying verbal memory processes. We propose using process models to subdivide memory into multiple processes, which helps in localizing the most affected processes in impaired verbal memory. Additionally, the model can be used to address score and process variability. This study aims to investigate the effects of cancer and its treatment on verbal memory, as well as provide a demonstration of how process models can be used to investigate the uncertainty in neuropsychological test scores.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We present an investigation of memory process scores in non-CNS cancer survivors (<i>n</i> = 184) and no-cancer controls (<i>n</i> = 204). The participants completed the Amsterdam Cognition Scan (ACS), in which classical neuropsychological tests are digitally recreated for online at-home administration. We analyzed data from the ACS equivalent of a Verbal Learning Test using both traditional sum scores and a Bayesian process model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the sum score indicated that patients scored lower than controls on immediate recall but found no difference for delayed recall. The process model analysis indicated a small difference between patients and controls in immediate retrieval from both the partially learned and learned states, with no differences in learning or delayed retrieval processes. Individual-level analysis shows considerable uncertainty for sum scores. Sum scores were more certain than single trials. Retrieval parameters also showed less uncertainty than learning parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Bayesian process model increased the informativity of Verbal Learning test data, by showing uncertainty of the traditional sum score measurements as well as how the underlying processes differed between populations. Additionally, the model grants insight into underlying memory processes for individuals and how these processes vary within and between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2313256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Verbal memory is a complex and fundamental aspect of human cognition. However, traditional sum-score analyses of verbal learning tests oversimplify underlying verbal memory processes. We propose using process models to subdivide memory into multiple processes, which helps in localizing the most affected processes in impaired verbal memory. Additionally, the model can be used to address score and process variability. This study aims to investigate the effects of cancer and its treatment on verbal memory, as well as provide a demonstration of how process models can be used to investigate the uncertainty in neuropsychological test scores.

Method: We present an investigation of memory process scores in non-CNS cancer survivors (n = 184) and no-cancer controls (n = 204). The participants completed the Amsterdam Cognition Scan (ACS), in which classical neuropsychological tests are digitally recreated for online at-home administration. We analyzed data from the ACS equivalent of a Verbal Learning Test using both traditional sum scores and a Bayesian process model.

Results: Analysis of the sum score indicated that patients scored lower than controls on immediate recall but found no difference for delayed recall. The process model analysis indicated a small difference between patients and controls in immediate retrieval from both the partially learned and learned states, with no differences in learning or delayed retrieval processes. Individual-level analysis shows considerable uncertainty for sum scores. Sum scores were more certain than single trials. Retrieval parameters also showed less uncertainty than learning parameters.

Conclusion: The Bayesian process model increased the informativity of Verbal Learning test data, by showing uncertainty of the traditional sum score measurements as well as how the underlying processes differed between populations. Additionally, the model grants insight into underlying memory processes for individuals and how these processes vary within and between them.

癌症幸存者言语记忆的过程模型:贝叶斯过程建模方法对测试分数变化的影响。
简介言语记忆是人类认知的一个复杂而基本的方面。然而,传统的言语学习测试总分分析过度简化了潜在的言语记忆过程。我们建议使用过程模型将记忆细分为多个过程,这有助于定位言语记忆受损中最受影响的过程。此外,该模型还可用于解决分数和过程的可变性问题。本研究旨在调查癌症及其治疗对言语记忆的影响,并展示如何利用过程模型来调查神经心理测试分数的不确定性:我们对非中枢神经系统癌症幸存者(184 人)和非癌症对照组(204 人)的记忆过程得分进行了调查。参加者完成了阿姆斯特丹认知扫描(ACS),该扫描对经典的神经心理学测试进行了数字再现,以便在线在家进行测试。我们使用传统的总分和贝叶斯过程模型分析了相当于言语学习测试的 ACS 数据:结果:总分分析表明,患者的即时回忆得分低于对照组,但延迟回忆得分没有差异。过程模型分析表明,患者和对照组在部分学习状态和学习状态的即时检索方面存在微小差异,而在学习或延迟检索过程中没有差异。个体层面的分析表明,总分具有相当大的不确定性。总分比单次试验更确定。检索参数的不确定性也小于学习参数:贝叶斯过程模型增加了言语学习测试数据的信息量,显示了传统总分测量的不确定性,以及不同人群的基本过程有何不同。此外,该模型还有助于深入了解个体的基本记忆过程,以及这些过程在个体内部和个体之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信