Diagnostic performance of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve.

Abstract

Fluid dynamics studies have proposed that coronary flow reserve can be calculated from coronary artery pressure instead of coronary blood flow. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve (pb-CFR) compared with CFR measured by conventional thermodilution method (CFR_thermo) in the clinical setting. Pressure guidewire was used to measure CFR_thermo and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in left anterior descending coronary artery in 62 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Pb-CFR was calculated only with resting distal coronary artery pressure (Pd), resting aortic pressure (Pa) and FFR. Pb-CFR was moderately correlated with CFR_thermo (r = 0.54, P < 0.001). Pb-CFR showed a poor agreement with CFR_thermo, presenting large values of mean difference and root mean square deviation (1.5 ± 1.4). Pb-CFR < 2.0 predicted CFR_thermo < 2.0 with an accuracy of 79%, sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of 48%, negative predictive value of 95%. The discordance presenting CFR_thermo < 2.0 and pb-CFR ≥ 2.0 was associated with diffuse disease (P < 0.001). The discordance presenting CFR_thermo ≥ 2 and pb-CFR < 2 was associated with a high FFR (P = 0.002). Pb-CFR showed moderate correlation and poor agreement with CFR_thermo. Pb-CFR might be reliable in excluding epicardial coronary artery disease and microcirculatory disorders.