Predictors of primary care psychological therapy outcomes for depression and anxiety in people living with dementia: evidence from national healthcare records in England.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Georgia Bell, Celine El Baou, Rob Saunders, Joshua E J Buckman, Georgina Charlesworth, Marcus Richards, Caroline Fearn, Barbara Brown, Shirley Nurock, Stuart Michael, Paul Ware, Natalie L Marchant, Elisa Aguirre, Miguel Rio, Claudia Cooper, Stephen Pilling, Amber John, Joshua Stott
{"title":"Predictors of primary care psychological therapy outcomes for depression and anxiety in people living with dementia: evidence from national healthcare records in England.","authors":"Georgia Bell, Celine El Baou, Rob Saunders, Joshua E J Buckman, Georgina Charlesworth, Marcus Richards, Caroline Fearn, Barbara Brown, Shirley Nurock, Stuart Michael, Paul Ware, Natalie L Marchant, Elisa Aguirre, Miguel Rio, Claudia Cooper, Stephen Pilling, Amber John, Joshua Stott","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological therapies can be effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety in people living with dementia (PLWD). However, factors associated with better therapy outcomes in PLWD are currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate whether dementia-specific and non-dementia-specific factors are associated with therapy outcomes in PLWD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>National linked healthcare records were used to identify 1522 PLWD who attended psychological therapy services across England. Associations between various factors and therapy outcomes were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with frontotemporal dementia were more likely to experience reliable deterioration in depression/anxiety symptoms compared with people with vascular dementia (odds ratio 2.98, 95% CI 1.08-8.22; <i>P</i> = 0.03) or Alzheimer's disease (odds ratio 2.95, 95% CI 1.15-7.55; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Greater depression severity (reliable recovery: odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, <i>P</i> < 0.001; reliable deterioration: odds ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.04-2.90, <i>P</i> = 0.04), lower work and social functioning (recovery: odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, <i>P</i> = 0.002), psychotropic medication use (recovery: odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.90, <i>P</i> = 0.01), being of working age (recovery: odds ratio 2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.73, <i>P</i> = 0.02) and fewer therapy sessions (recovery: odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were associated with worse therapy outcomes in PLWD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dementia type was generally not associated with outcomes, whereas clinical factors were consistent with those identified for the general population. Additional support and adaptations may be required to improve therapy outcomes in PLWD, particularly in those who are younger and have more severe depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"205-212"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.12","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological therapies can be effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety in people living with dementia (PLWD). However, factors associated with better therapy outcomes in PLWD are currently unknown.

Aims: To investigate whether dementia-specific and non-dementia-specific factors are associated with therapy outcomes in PLWD.

Method: National linked healthcare records were used to identify 1522 PLWD who attended psychological therapy services across England. Associations between various factors and therapy outcomes were explored.

Results: People with frontotemporal dementia were more likely to experience reliable deterioration in depression/anxiety symptoms compared with people with vascular dementia (odds ratio 2.98, 95% CI 1.08-8.22; P = 0.03) or Alzheimer's disease (odds ratio 2.95, 95% CI 1.15-7.55; P = 0.03). Greater depression severity (reliable recovery: odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, P < 0.001; reliable deterioration: odds ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.04-2.90, P = 0.04), lower work and social functioning (recovery: odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, P = 0.002), psychotropic medication use (recovery: odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.90, P = 0.01), being of working age (recovery: odds ratio 2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.73, P = 0.02) and fewer therapy sessions (recovery: odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16, P < 0.001) were associated with worse therapy outcomes in PLWD.

Conclusions: Dementia type was generally not associated with outcomes, whereas clinical factors were consistent with those identified for the general population. Additional support and adaptations may be required to improve therapy outcomes in PLWD, particularly in those who are younger and have more severe depression.

痴呆症患者抑郁和焦虑的初级保健心理治疗结果预测因素:来自英格兰全国医疗记录的证据。
背景:心理疗法可以有效减轻痴呆症患者(PLWD)的抑郁和焦虑症状。目的:调查痴呆症特异性因素和非痴呆症特异性因素是否与痴呆症患者的治疗效果有关:方法:使用全国联网的医疗保健记录来识别英格兰1522名接受心理治疗的PLWD患者。研究探讨了各种因素与治疗效果之间的关联:结果:与血管性痴呆患者(几率比2.98,95% CI 1.08-8.22;P = 0.03)或阿尔茨海默病患者(几率比2.95,95% CI 1.15-7.55;P = 0.03)相比,额颞叶痴呆患者的抑郁/焦虑症状更有可能出现可靠的恶化。更严重的抑郁(可靠恢复:几率比 0.95,95% CI 0.92-0.98,P <0.001;可靠恶化:几率比 1.73,95% CI 1.04-2.90,P =0.04)、更低的工作和社会功能(恢复:几率比 0.98,95% CI 0.96-0.99,P =0.002)、精神药物使用(恢复:几率比 0.67,95% CI 0.51-0.90,P = 0.01)、工作年龄(康复:几率比 2.03,95% CI 1.10-3.73,P = 0.02)和治疗次数较少(康复:几率比 1.12,95% CI 1.09-1.16,P <0.001)与 PLWD 治疗效果较差有关:结论:痴呆症类型一般与治疗效果无关,而临床因素则与普通人群的临床因素一致。要改善 PLWD 患者的治疗效果,可能需要额外的支持和调整,尤其是对那些年龄较小、抑郁症较严重的 PLWD 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信