Diterpenoid alkaloids with chemotaxonomic significance from Aconitum polycarpum

IF 1.4 4区生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2024.104797

Lin Chen , Jie Wen , Jia-Yi Ma , Ke Xu , Cheng-En Fu , Wen-Cheng Liang , Chen-Ying Zhu , Jin-Qiu Wang , Shuai Huang , Xian-Li Zhou

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phytochemical investigation on the roots of Aconitum polycarpum Chang ex W. T. Wang (Ranunculaceae) led to the isolation of twenty-six compounds for the first time. Their structures were determined by NMR analysis and compared with reported data. The chemotaxonomic value of these compounds was further discussed by network analysis. The structural features of the isolated diterpenoid alkaloids indicate that the relatively advanced evolutionary status of A. polycarpum within subgenus Aconitum. Some compounds, such as 12, 18, 20, 21, and 22 with a limited distribution in the genus Aconitum exhibited certain potential chemotaxonomically values.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从 Aconitum polycarpum 中提取的具有化学分类学意义的二萜生物碱

通过对 Aconitum polycarpum Chang ex W. T. Wang（毛茛科）根部的植物化学研究，首次分离出 26 种化合物。通过核磁共振分析确定了这些化合物的结构，并与已报道的数据进行了比较。通过网络分析进一步讨论了这些化合物的化学分类学价值。分离出的二萜生物碱的结构特征表明，A. polycarpum 在乌头亚属中的进化地位相对较高。一些化合物，如 12、18、20、21 和 22，在乌头属中分布有限，但这些化合物具有一定的化学分类学价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.