4E comparison and optimization of natural gas or solar-powered combined gas turbine cycle and inverse Brayton cycle in hydrogen and freshwater multi-generation systems

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Mohammad Zoghi , Nasser Hosseinzadeh , Ali Zare
{"title":"4E comparison and optimization of natural gas or solar-powered combined gas turbine cycle and inverse Brayton cycle in hydrogen and freshwater multi-generation systems","authors":"Mohammad Zoghi ,&nbsp;Nasser Hosseinzadeh ,&nbsp;Ali Zare","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Replacing fossil fuel-based systems with renewable energy resources is a method to enhance the performance of the layout and reduce environmental pollution. The gas turbine cycle (GTC) is one of the main sources of consuming natural gas (NG) in a combustion chamber (CC). In the present study, the theoretical performance of a 500 kW CC-based gas turbine cycle is improved by replacing the NG CC with a solar power tower (SPT) and converting it into a multi-generation system. The waste heat recovery of GTC is done by a hot water unit and an inverse Brayton cycle (IBC), and then the energy of the heat rejection stage of IBC and the exhausted gas of the system is recovered by a thermoelectric generator (TEG) and an absorption chiller. Afterwards, the produced power of IBC and TEG is fed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit for hydrogen and potable water outputs. 4E optimization shows that the exergy efficiencies of the CC-based system (Configuration 1) and the SPT-based system (Configuration 2) are equal to 37.2% and 9.12%, respectively. However, the economic performance of Configuration 2 is better. In this case, the total cost rate and unit cost of multi-generation in Configuration 2 are 142.1 $/h and 15.14 $/GJ in comparison with 145.5 $/h and 31.58 $/GJ for Configuration 1. In addition, the fossil fuel consumption and emissions of Configuration 2 are zero, while the fuel and environmental cost rate make up 54.76% of the total cost rate of Configuration 1.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000103/pdfft?md5=4dda668904cecc11f26cdfb7de14c3bf&pid=1-s2.0-S1755008424000103-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Replacing fossil fuel-based systems with renewable energy resources is a method to enhance the performance of the layout and reduce environmental pollution. The gas turbine cycle (GTC) is one of the main sources of consuming natural gas (NG) in a combustion chamber (CC). In the present study, the theoretical performance of a 500 kW CC-based gas turbine cycle is improved by replacing the NG CC with a solar power tower (SPT) and converting it into a multi-generation system. The waste heat recovery of GTC is done by a hot water unit and an inverse Brayton cycle (IBC), and then the energy of the heat rejection stage of IBC and the exhausted gas of the system is recovered by a thermoelectric generator (TEG) and an absorption chiller. Afterwards, the produced power of IBC and TEG is fed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit for hydrogen and potable water outputs. 4E optimization shows that the exergy efficiencies of the CC-based system (Configuration 1) and the SPT-based system (Configuration 2) are equal to 37.2% and 9.12%, respectively. However, the economic performance of Configuration 2 is better. In this case, the total cost rate and unit cost of multi-generation in Configuration 2 are 142.1 $/h and 15.14 $/GJ in comparison with 145.5 $/h and 31.58 $/GJ for Configuration 1. In addition, the fossil fuel consumption and emissions of Configuration 2 are zero, while the fuel and environmental cost rate make up 54.76% of the total cost rate of Configuration 1.

4E 在氢气和淡水多联产系统中比较和优化天然气或太阳能联合燃气轮机循环和逆布雷顿循环
用可再生能源替代化石燃料系统是提高布局性能和减少环境污染的一种方法。燃气轮机循环(GTC)是燃烧室(CC)消耗天然气(NG)的主要来源之一。在本研究中,通过用太阳能发电塔(SPT)取代 NG CC 并将其转换为多发电系统,提高了基于 CC 的 500 kW 燃气轮机循环的理论性能。GTC 的余热回收由一个热水装置和一个反布雷顿循环 (IBC) 完成,然后由一个热电发电机 (TEG) 和一个吸收式冷却器回收 IBC 的排热阶段和系统废气的能量。之后,IBC 和 TEG 产生的能量被输送到质子交换膜电解槽和反渗透海水淡化装置,用于输出氢气和饮用水。4E 优化显示,基于 CC 的系统(配置 1)和基于 SPT 的系统(配置 2)的放能效率分别为 37.2% 和 9.12%。不过,配置 2 的经济效益更好。在这种情况下,与配置 1 的 145.5 美元/小时和 31.58 美元/吉焦相比,配置 2 的总成本率和多联产单位成本分别为 142.1 美元/小时和 15.14 美元/吉焦。此外,配置 2 的化石燃料消耗量和排放量为零,而燃料和环境成本率占配置 1 总成本率的 54.76%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信