Deep versus Shallow Processing: A Learning and Memory Experiment for Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Platforms.

Alexia E Pollack
{"title":"Deep versus Shallow Processing: A Learning and Memory Experiment for Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Platforms.","authors":"Alexia E Pollack","doi":"10.59390/FEAP4736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Processing of words can be meaning-based (deep processing) or appearance/sound-based (shallow processing). A simple experiment that can be conducted online, asynchronously or synchronously, demonstrates that the number of words recalled from a list of 24 words read aloud depends on the instructions given to students beforehand. Students in the deep processing group were asked to write 'yes' or 'no' - <i>is the word likeable/pleasant</i>, while students in the shallow processing group were asked to write 'yes' or 'no' - <i>does the word contain an E or G</i>. After a one-minute delay in which students performed a backward calculation task, they had two minutes to recall as many words as possible from the list. Regardless of how the online experiment was conducted, asynchronously or synchronously, the deep processing group recalled an average of 11-14 words compared to the shallow processing group, which recalled an average of 8-10 words. The deep processing group consistently recalled 3-6 more words on average than the shallow processing group. After debriefing the students about the experiment, the instructor can focus class discussion on topics that include experimental design, methodology, reproducibility, data analysis, as well as using these data as an evidence-based starting point for best learning practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":74004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience","volume":"20 2","pages":"A146-A149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59390/FEAP4736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Processing of words can be meaning-based (deep processing) or appearance/sound-based (shallow processing). A simple experiment that can be conducted online, asynchronously or synchronously, demonstrates that the number of words recalled from a list of 24 words read aloud depends on the instructions given to students beforehand. Students in the deep processing group were asked to write 'yes' or 'no' - is the word likeable/pleasant, while students in the shallow processing group were asked to write 'yes' or 'no' - does the word contain an E or G. After a one-minute delay in which students performed a backward calculation task, they had two minutes to recall as many words as possible from the list. Regardless of how the online experiment was conducted, asynchronously or synchronously, the deep processing group recalled an average of 11-14 words compared to the shallow processing group, which recalled an average of 8-10 words. The deep processing group consistently recalled 3-6 more words on average than the shallow processing group. After debriefing the students about the experiment, the instructor can focus class discussion on topics that include experimental design, methodology, reproducibility, data analysis, as well as using these data as an evidence-based starting point for best learning practices.

深处理与浅处理:异步和同步在线平台的学习与记忆实验。
对单词的处理可以是基于意义的(深层处理),也可以是基于外观/声音的(浅层处理)。一个可以异步或同步在线进行的简单实验表明,从朗读的 24 个单词列表中回忆出的单词数量取决于事先给学生的指导。深加工组的学生被要求写出 "是 "或 "否"--单词是否讨人喜欢/令人愉快,而浅加工组的学生则被要求写出 "是 "或 "否"--单词是否包含 E 或 G。无论在线实验是以异步还是同步的方式进行,深加工组平均回忆出 11-14 个单词,而浅加工组平均回忆出 8-10 个单词。深加工组比浅加工组平均多回忆出 3-6 个单词。在向学生汇报实验情况后,教师可以在课堂上重点讨论实验设计、方法、可重复性、数据分析以及将这些数据作为最佳学习实践的循证起点等话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信