Using a standalone ear-EEG device for focal-onset seizure detection.

McGregor Joyner, Sheng-Hsiou Hsu, Stephanie Martin, Jennifer Dwyer, Denise Fay Chen, Reza Sameni, Samuel H Waters, Konstantin Borodin, Gari D Clifford, Allan I Levey, John Hixson, Daniel Winkel, Jonathan Berent
{"title":"Using a standalone ear-EEG device for focal-onset seizure detection.","authors":"McGregor Joyner, Sheng-Hsiou Hsu, Stephanie Martin, Jennifer Dwyer, Denise Fay Chen, Reza Sameni, Samuel H Waters, Konstantin Borodin, Gari D Clifford, Allan I Levey, John Hixson, Daniel Winkel, Jonathan Berent","doi":"10.1186/s42234-023-00135-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seizure detection is challenging outside the clinical environment due to the lack of comfortable, reliable, and practical long-term neurophysiological monitoring devices. We developed a novel, discreet, unobstructive in-ear sensing system that enables long-term electroencephalography (EEG) recording. This is the first study we are aware of that systematically compares the seizure detection utility of in-ear EEG with that of simultaneously recorded intracranial EEG. In addition, we present a similar comparison between simultaneously recorded in-ear EEG and scalp EEG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this foundational research, we conducted a clinical feasibility study and validated the ability of the ear-EEG system to capture focal-onset seizures against 1255 hrs of simultaneous ear-EEG data along with scalp or intracranial EEG in 20 patients with refractory focal epilepsy (11 with scalp EEG, 8 with intracranial EEG, and 1 with both).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a blinded, independent review of the ear-EEG signals, two epileptologists were able to detect 86.4% of the seizures that were subsequently identified using the clinical gold standard EEG modalities, with a false detection rate of 0.1 per day, well below what has been reported for ambulatory monitoring. The few seizures not detected on the ear-EEG signals emanated from deep within the mesial temporal lobe or extra-temporally and remained very focal, without significant propagation. Following multiple sessions of recording for a median continuous wear time of 13 hrs, patients reported a high degree of tolerance for the device, with only minor adverse events reported by the scalp EEG cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These preliminary results demonstrate the potential of using ear-EEG to enable routine collection of complementary, prolonged, and remote neurophysiological evidence, which may permit real-time detection of paroxysmal events such as seizures and epileptiform discharges. This study suggests that the ear-EEG device may assist clinicians in making an epilepsy diagnosis, assessing treatment efficacy, and optimizing medication titration.</p>","PeriodicalId":72363,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectronic medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10848360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectronic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-023-00135-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seizure detection is challenging outside the clinical environment due to the lack of comfortable, reliable, and practical long-term neurophysiological monitoring devices. We developed a novel, discreet, unobstructive in-ear sensing system that enables long-term electroencephalography (EEG) recording. This is the first study we are aware of that systematically compares the seizure detection utility of in-ear EEG with that of simultaneously recorded intracranial EEG. In addition, we present a similar comparison between simultaneously recorded in-ear EEG and scalp EEG.

Methods: In this foundational research, we conducted a clinical feasibility study and validated the ability of the ear-EEG system to capture focal-onset seizures against 1255 hrs of simultaneous ear-EEG data along with scalp or intracranial EEG in 20 patients with refractory focal epilepsy (11 with scalp EEG, 8 with intracranial EEG, and 1 with both).

Results: In a blinded, independent review of the ear-EEG signals, two epileptologists were able to detect 86.4% of the seizures that were subsequently identified using the clinical gold standard EEG modalities, with a false detection rate of 0.1 per day, well below what has been reported for ambulatory monitoring. The few seizures not detected on the ear-EEG signals emanated from deep within the mesial temporal lobe or extra-temporally and remained very focal, without significant propagation. Following multiple sessions of recording for a median continuous wear time of 13 hrs, patients reported a high degree of tolerance for the device, with only minor adverse events reported by the scalp EEG cohort.

Conclusions: These preliminary results demonstrate the potential of using ear-EEG to enable routine collection of complementary, prolonged, and remote neurophysiological evidence, which may permit real-time detection of paroxysmal events such as seizures and epileptiform discharges. This study suggests that the ear-EEG device may assist clinicians in making an epilepsy diagnosis, assessing treatment efficacy, and optimizing medication titration.

使用独立的耳部电子脑电图设备检测局灶性癫痫发作。
背景:由于缺乏舒适、可靠和实用的长期神经电生理监测设备,癫痫发作检测在临床环境之外具有挑战性。我们开发了一种新颖、隐蔽、无障碍的耳内传感系统,可进行长期脑电图(EEG)记录。据我们所知,这是第一项系统比较耳内脑电图与同时记录的颅内脑电图的癫痫发作检测效用的研究。此外,我们还对同时记录的耳内脑电图和头皮脑电图进行了类似的比较:在这项基础研究中,我们对 20 名难治性局灶性癫痫患者(其中 11 人使用头皮脑电图,8 人使用颅内脑电图,1 人同时使用头皮脑电图和颅内脑电图)进行了临床可行性研究,并对照 1255 小时的同步耳内脑电图数据和头皮或颅内脑电图数据,验证了耳内脑电图系统捕捉局灶性癫痫发作的能力:在对耳部脑电图信号进行盲法独立审查时,两位癫痫专家能够检测出 86.4% 的癫痫发作,随后使用临床金标准脑电图模式进行识别,误检率为每天 0.1 次,远低于非卧床监测的误检率。耳部脑电图信号未检测到的少数癫痫发作来自颞叶中叶深部或颞叶外侧,仍然非常集中,没有明显的传播。在连续佩戴时间中位数为 13 小时的多次记录后,患者对该设备的耐受性很高,头皮脑电图组只报告了轻微的不良事件:这些初步结果表明,使用耳部电子脑电图可以常规收集补充性、长时间和远程神经生理学证据,从而可以实时检测癫痫发作和癫痫样放电等阵发性事件。这项研究表明,耳部电子脑电图设备可协助临床医生进行癫痫诊断、评估疗效和优化药物滴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信