Determinants of access to rehabilitation professionals by individuals with stroke in the first six months after hospital discharge in Brazil: a study based on the Andersen model.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2304969
Jordana P Magalhães, Iza Faria-Fortini, Kênia Kp Menezes, Isadora A Lara, Ludmilla R Batista, Romeu Sant'anna, Christina Dcm Faria
{"title":"Determinants of access to rehabilitation professionals by individuals with stroke in the first six months after hospital discharge in Brazil: a study based on the Andersen model.","authors":"Jordana P Magalhães, Iza Faria-Fortini, Kênia Kp Menezes, Isadora A Lara, Ludmilla R Batista, Romeu Sant'anna, Christina Dcm Faria","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2304969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>determinants of access to rehabilitation professionals after stroke in middle-income countries, where the burden of this disease is higher, are little known.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the determinants of access to rehabilitation professionals by individuals with stroke at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge in Brazil and compare referral and access rates after discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal and prospective study, with individuals with primary stroke, without previous disabilities. At hospital discharge, the number of rehabilitation professionals referred by the multidisciplinary team was recorded. The possible determinants of access, according to Andersen's model, were: a) predisposing factors: age, sex, education levels, and belief that they could improve with treatment; b) need factors: stroke severity, levels of disability; c) enabling factors: socioeconomic status, disposable income for health care, and quality of care provided by rehabilitation professionals. One, three, and six months after hospital discharge, individuals were contacted to identify which rehabilitation professionals were accessed. Multiple linear regression model and Wilcoxon tests were used (α=5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>201 individuals were included. Disability levels and stroke severity explained 31%, 34%, and 39% (p<0.01) of access at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge, respectively. In all periods, there was less access than that recommended at the time of hospital discharge (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Need factors (disability levels and stroke severity) were determinants of access in all assessed periods. In addition, in all periods, the comprehensiveness of care for individuals with stroke was compromised.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"615-624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2304969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: determinants of access to rehabilitation professionals after stroke in middle-income countries, where the burden of this disease is higher, are little known.

Objectives: To identify the determinants of access to rehabilitation professionals by individuals with stroke at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge in Brazil and compare referral and access rates after discharge.

Methods: Longitudinal and prospective study, with individuals with primary stroke, without previous disabilities. At hospital discharge, the number of rehabilitation professionals referred by the multidisciplinary team was recorded. The possible determinants of access, according to Andersen's model, were: a) predisposing factors: age, sex, education levels, and belief that they could improve with treatment; b) need factors: stroke severity, levels of disability; c) enabling factors: socioeconomic status, disposable income for health care, and quality of care provided by rehabilitation professionals. One, three, and six months after hospital discharge, individuals were contacted to identify which rehabilitation professionals were accessed. Multiple linear regression model and Wilcoxon tests were used (α=5%).

Results: 201 individuals were included. Disability levels and stroke severity explained 31%, 34%, and 39% (p<0.01) of access at one, three, and six months after hospital discharge, respectively. In all periods, there was less access than that recommended at the time of hospital discharge (p<0.01).

Conclusion: Need factors (disability levels and stroke severity) were determinants of access in all assessed periods. In addition, in all periods, the comprehensiveness of care for individuals with stroke was compromised.

巴西中风患者出院后头六个月接触康复专业人员的决定因素:基于安德森模型的研究。
背景:在中风负担较重的中等收入国家,人们对中风后获得康复专业人员服务的决定因素知之甚少:目的:确定巴西中风患者出院后 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月内接触康复专业人员的决定因素,并比较出院后的转诊率和接触率:方法:纵向和前瞻性研究,对象为无残疾的原发性中风患者。出院时,记录多学科团队转介的康复专业人员数量。根据安徒生模型,获得康复治疗的可能决定因素包括:a) 易感因素:年龄、性别、教育水平、治疗后可改善的信念;b) 需要因素:中风严重程度、残疾程度;c) 有利因素:社会经济地位、医疗保健可支配收入、康复专业人员提供的护理质量。在出院后的 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月,与患者取得联系,以确定其接受了哪些康复专业人员的治疗。采用多元线性回归模型和 Wilcoxon 检验(α=5%)。残疾程度和中风严重程度分别解释了 31%、34% 和 39%(pConclusion):需求因素(残疾程度和中风严重程度)是所有评估时段内获得医疗服务的决定因素。此外,在所有时期,对中风患者的全面护理都受到了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信