Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing of C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin in Neonates with Clinically Suspected Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medical Principles and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1159/000536678
Medha Goyal, Dwayne Mascarenhas, Prashanth Rr, Anitha Haribalakrishna
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Testing of C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Procalcitonin in Neonates with Clinically Suspected Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Medha Goyal, Dwayne Mascarenhas, Prashanth Rr, Anitha Haribalakrishna","doi":"10.1159/000536678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706-0.867, p &lt; 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] - 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC - 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"291-298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11175603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sepsis often prompts clinicians to start empirical antibiotics in suspected neonates while awaiting diagnosis. The next-generation testing with point-of-care (POC) techniques offers a lead-time advantage that could bridge the gap by providing a timely diagnosis.

Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic study in 82 neonates enrolled between May and October 2022 in a level III neonatal intensive care unit. All neonates with a new episode of clinically suspected sepsis were included. Diagnostic accuracy of POC testing of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) with standard laboratory methods was performed.

Results: The mean gestation age and birth weight of the neonates were 33.17 ± 4.25 weeks and 1,695.4 ± 700.74 grams, respectively. Most neonates were preterm (75%) with nearly equal proportions of early (51.22%) and late-onset (48.78%) sepsis. The POC CRP correlated well with standard CRP (r = 0.8001, 95% CI: 0.706-0.867, p < 0.0001). Among the three biomarkers, CRP had the maximum diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] - 0.73) followed by PCT (AUC - 0.65) and IL-6 (0.55). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CRP (p = 0.46), PCT (p = 0.29), and IL-6 (p = 0.60) in early- and late-onset sepsis. The mean time for POC estimation of IL-6, PCT, and CRP was 12 ± 3 min which was significantly less compared to 366 ± 61 min for standard techniques (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: POC CRP correlates well with standard techniques of estimation, and CRP alone and in combination with PCT has good diagnostic accuracy in neonatal sepsis.

临床疑似败血症新生儿C-反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6和降钙素原的照护点检测诊断准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究
目的:败血症通常会促使临床医生在等待诊断期间对疑似新生儿开始使用经验性抗生素。采用护理点技术的新一代检测具有前置时间优势,可通过提供及时诊断弥补这一差距:我们对 2022 年 5 月至 10 月间入住三级新生儿重症监护病房的 82 名新生儿进行了前瞻性诊断研究。所有新发临床疑似败血症的新生儿均被纳入研究。采用标准实验室方法对C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和降钙素原进行床旁(POC)检测,以确定诊断的准确性:新生儿的平均孕周和出生体重分别为(33.17 ± 4.25)周和(1695.4 ± 700.74)克。大多数新生儿是早产儿(75%),早期(51.22%)和晚期(48.78%)败血症的比例几乎相等。护理点 CRP 与标准 CRP 的相关性很好(r = 0.8001,95% CI:0.706 - 0.867,p < 0.0001)。在三种生物标记物中,CRP 的诊断准确率最高(AUC - 0.73),其次是降钙素原(AUC - 0.65)和 IL-6(0.55)。CRP (p = 0.46)、降钙素原 (p = 0.29) 和 IL-6 (p = 0.60) 对早期和晚期败血症的诊断准确性无明显差异。护理点估测 IL-6、PCT 和 CRP 的平均时间为 12 ± 3 分钟,与标准技术的 366 ± 61 分钟相比明显缩短。(P<0.001):结论:护理点 CRP 与标准估算技术有很好的相关性,CRP 单独使用或与降钙素原联合使用对新生儿败血症有很好的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信