Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Long-Acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists: An Analysis of the FAERS Database 2020-2023.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00408-024-00677-3
Maria Gabriella Matera, Luigino Calzetta, Paola Rogliani, Nicola Hanania, Mario Cazzola
{"title":"Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Long-Acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists: An Analysis of the FAERS Database 2020-2023.","authors":"Maria Gabriella Matera, Luigino Calzetta, Paola Rogliani, Nicola Hanania, Mario Cazzola","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00677-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine reports of cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs) observed in the real-world during treatment with aclidinium, tiotropium, glycopyrronium, and umeclidinium alone or in combination with a LABA and, in the context of triple therapy, with the addition of an ICS, and submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing CV AE reports submitted to the FAERS from January 2020 to 30 September 2023. Disproportionality was measured by calculating the reporting odds ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with ipratropium, tiotropium was associated with fewer reports of CV AEs. Compared with tiotropium, other LAMAs were more likely to be associated with reports of CV AEs. Combinations of glycopyrronium with indacaterol or formoterol and umeclidinium with vilanterol significantly reduced reports of CV AEs compared with the respective LAMA. The addition of an ICS to these combinations further reduced the risk of CV AE reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that inhaled LAMAs are not free from cardiac AE risks. This risk may be more evident when the newer LAMAs are used, but it is generally significantly reduced when COPD patients are treated with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy. However, these results do not prove that LAMAs cause CV AEs, as FAERS data alone are not indicative of a drug's safety profile. Given the frequency with which COPD and cardiovascular disease co-exist, a large study in the general population could shed light on this very important issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11009752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00677-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine reports of cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs) observed in the real-world during treatment with aclidinium, tiotropium, glycopyrronium, and umeclidinium alone or in combination with a LABA and, in the context of triple therapy, with the addition of an ICS, and submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Methods: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing CV AE reports submitted to the FAERS from January 2020 to 30 September 2023. Disproportionality was measured by calculating the reporting odds ratio.

Results: Compared with ipratropium, tiotropium was associated with fewer reports of CV AEs. Compared with tiotropium, other LAMAs were more likely to be associated with reports of CV AEs. Combinations of glycopyrronium with indacaterol or formoterol and umeclidinium with vilanterol significantly reduced reports of CV AEs compared with the respective LAMA. The addition of an ICS to these combinations further reduced the risk of CV AE reports.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that inhaled LAMAs are not free from cardiac AE risks. This risk may be more evident when the newer LAMAs are used, but it is generally significantly reduced when COPD patients are treated with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy. However, these results do not prove that LAMAs cause CV AEs, as FAERS data alone are not indicative of a drug's safety profile. Given the frequency with which COPD and cardiovascular disease co-exist, a large study in the general population could shed light on this very important issue.

Abstract Image

使用长效肌卡因受体拮抗剂引发的心血管事件:2020-2023 年 FAERS 数据库分析。
目的:本研究旨在研究在阿利地铵、噻托溴铵、甘氟吡铵和乌美拉地铵单独或与 LABA 联用治疗期间,以及在三联疗法中加入 ICS 时,在真实世界中观察到的心血管不良事件(CV AEs)报告,并将其提交至食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS):利用 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月 30 日期间提交至 FAERS 的 CV AE 报告进行了一项回顾性比例失调分析。方法:利用 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月 30 日期间提交给 FAERS 的 CV AE 报告进行回顾性比例失调分析,通过计算报告几率比来衡量比例失调情况:结果:与异丙托品相比,噻托品的CV AE报告更少。与噻托溴铵相比,其他 LAMAs 更有可能与 CV AEs 报告相关。与相应的 LAMA 相比,甘草酸铵与茚达特罗或福莫特罗的组合以及乌美拉地铵与维兰特罗的组合可显著减少 CV AEs 报告。结论:我们的研究表明,吸入性 LAMA 和 LAMA 药物联合治疗可显著减少 CV AEs 报告,而在这些联合治疗中加入 ICS 可进一步降低 CV AEs 报告的风险:我们的研究表明,吸入式 LAMA 并非没有心脏 AE 风险。结论:我们的研究表明,吸入式 LAMAs 并非没有心脏 AE 风险,使用较新的 LAMAs 时这种风险可能更加明显,但 COPD 患者使用双支气管扩张剂或三联疗法时,这种风险一般会显著降低。不过,这些结果并不能证明 LAMAs 会导致心血管 AE,因为 FAERS 数据本身并不能说明药物的安全性。鉴于慢性阻塞性肺病和心血管疾病并存的频率很高,在普通人群中开展一项大型研究可以揭示这个非常重要的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信