Experimental evaluation of the plunger technique: A method of cyclic manual aspiration thrombectomy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1177/15910199241230364
Demitria A Poulos, James S Keith, Michael T Froehler, Bryan C Good
{"title":"Experimental evaluation of the plunger technique: A method of cyclic manual aspiration thrombectomy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"Demitria A Poulos, James S Keith, Michael T Froehler, Bryan C Good","doi":"10.1177/15910199241230364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy via direct aspiration is a rapid treatment for acute ischemic stroke. This method often results in the partial ingestion of the clot or \"corking\" of the catheter tip. Cyclic aspiration may take advantage of the mechanical properties of the clot, resulting in greater clot ingestion and overall procedure success.MethodsAn <i>in vitro</i> analysis was performed comparing static and cyclic (plunger technique) aspiration. Embolus analogs were used to create occlusions in a mock circulatory flow loop, and one aspiration attempt (first pass effect) using either a static or plunger technique was performed. The percent ingestion of each embolus analog was recorded for each trial.ResultsStatic aspiration for 0% and 50% hematocrit embolus analogs resulted in ingestions of 12.8 ± 4.6% and 15.1 ± 10.0%, respectively, while plunger technique (cyclic) aspiration resulted in 15.8 ± 7.3% and 34.4 ± 19.5% ingestion. Complete ingestion was observed only with 50% hematocrit analogs, occurring in 30% of plunger and 10% of static cases. Statistical differences were determined between the two aspiration techniques for the 50% hematocrit samples, with the plunger technique yielding significantly more ingestion. In addition, the plunger technique was shown to maintain a negative vacuum pressure throughout the duration of cyclic plunging.ConclusionsThe plunger technique for manual cyclic aspiration resulted in higher rates of complete ingestion and greater average % ingestions when compared to static aspiration. Increased clot ingestion can result in a higher rate of complete reperfusion during the first aspiration attempt, maximizing the number of patients with good clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1225-1231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241230364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy via direct aspiration is a rapid treatment for acute ischemic stroke. This method often results in the partial ingestion of the clot or "corking" of the catheter tip. Cyclic aspiration may take advantage of the mechanical properties of the clot, resulting in greater clot ingestion and overall procedure success.MethodsAn in vitro analysis was performed comparing static and cyclic (plunger technique) aspiration. Embolus analogs were used to create occlusions in a mock circulatory flow loop, and one aspiration attempt (first pass effect) using either a static or plunger technique was performed. The percent ingestion of each embolus analog was recorded for each trial.ResultsStatic aspiration for 0% and 50% hematocrit embolus analogs resulted in ingestions of 12.8 ± 4.6% and 15.1 ± 10.0%, respectively, while plunger technique (cyclic) aspiration resulted in 15.8 ± 7.3% and 34.4 ± 19.5% ingestion. Complete ingestion was observed only with 50% hematocrit analogs, occurring in 30% of plunger and 10% of static cases. Statistical differences were determined between the two aspiration techniques for the 50% hematocrit samples, with the plunger technique yielding significantly more ingestion. In addition, the plunger technique was shown to maintain a negative vacuum pressure throughout the duration of cyclic plunging.ConclusionsThe plunger technique for manual cyclic aspiration resulted in higher rates of complete ingestion and greater average % ingestions when compared to static aspiration. Increased clot ingestion can result in a higher rate of complete reperfusion during the first aspiration attempt, maximizing the number of patients with good clinical outcomes.

活塞技术的实验评估:用于治疗急性缺血性中风的循环人工抽吸血栓切除术。
背景:通过直接抽吸进行机械血栓切除是治疗急性缺血性中风的快速方法。这种方法通常会导致部分血栓被吸出或导管尖端 "塞住"。循环抽吸可利用血凝块的机械特性,使血凝块摄取更多,从而提高手术的整体成功率:方法:对静态抽吸和循环(柱塞技术)抽吸进行了体外分析比较。使用栓子类似物在模拟循环血流环路中造成闭塞,并使用静态或活塞技术进行一次抽吸尝试(首次通过效果)。每次试验都记录了每种栓子类似物的摄取百分比:结果:静态抽吸 0% 和 50% 血细胞比容的栓子类似物,摄取率分别为 12.8 ± 4.6% 和 15.1 ± 10.0%,而柱塞技术(循环)抽吸的摄取率分别为 15.8 ± 7.3% 和 34.4 ± 19.5%。只有血细胞比容为 50%的类似物才会出现完全摄取,柱塞式抽吸和静态抽吸分别占 30% 和 10%。对于 50%的血细胞比容样本,两种抽吸技术之间存在统计学差异,柱塞技术的摄取率明显更高。此外,柱塞技术还能在整个循环抽吸过程中保持负真空压力:结论:与静态抽吸相比,采用柱塞技术进行手动循环抽吸可获得更高的完全摄取率和更高的平均摄取率。血凝块摄取量的增加可提高首次抽吸时的完全再灌注率,最大限度地增加临床效果良好的患者人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书