Predicting progression to Alzheimer's disease dementia using cognitive measures

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Amy Macdougall, Tim Whitfield, Kelly Needham, Jonathan M. Schott, Chris Frost, Zuzana Walker
{"title":"Predicting progression to Alzheimer's disease dementia using cognitive measures","authors":"Amy Macdougall,&nbsp;Tim Whitfield,&nbsp;Kelly Needham,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Schott,&nbsp;Chris Frost,&nbsp;Zuzana Walker","doi":"10.1002/gps.6067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>It is important to determine if cognitive measures identified as being prognostic in dementia research cohorts also have utility in memory clinics. We aimed to identify measures with the greatest power to predict future Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in a clinical setting where expensive biomarkers are not widely available.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study utilized routine Memory Clinic data collected over 18 years. From 2214 patients assessed in the clinic, we selected 328 patients with an initial diagnosis of subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment. We compared two types of statistical model for the prediction of AD dementia. The first model included baseline cognitive test scores only, while the second model also included change scores between baseline and the first follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline scores on tests of global cognitive function (Mini-mental state examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination-Revised), verbal episodic memory and psychomotor speed were the best predictors of conversion to AD dementia. The inclusion of cognitive change scores over 1 year of follow-up improved predictive accuracy versus baseline scores alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found that the best cognitive predictors of AD dementia in a clinical setting were similar to those previously identified using research cohorts. Taking change in cognitive function into account enabled the onset of AD dementia to be predicted with greater accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

It is important to determine if cognitive measures identified as being prognostic in dementia research cohorts also have utility in memory clinics. We aimed to identify measures with the greatest power to predict future Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in a clinical setting where expensive biomarkers are not widely available.

Methods

This study utilized routine Memory Clinic data collected over 18 years. From 2214 patients assessed in the clinic, we selected 328 patients with an initial diagnosis of subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment. We compared two types of statistical model for the prediction of AD dementia. The first model included baseline cognitive test scores only, while the second model also included change scores between baseline and the first follow-up.

Results

Baseline scores on tests of global cognitive function (Mini-mental state examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination-Revised), verbal episodic memory and psychomotor speed were the best predictors of conversion to AD dementia. The inclusion of cognitive change scores over 1 year of follow-up improved predictive accuracy versus baseline scores alone.

Conclusions

We found that the best cognitive predictors of AD dementia in a clinical setting were similar to those previously identified using research cohorts. Taking change in cognitive function into account enabled the onset of AD dementia to be predicted with greater accuracy.

Abstract Image

利用认知测量方法预测阿尔茨海默病痴呆症的进展。
目的:重要的是要确定在痴呆症研究队列中被确定为具有预后作用的认知指标是否也能在记忆诊所中发挥作用。我们的目的是在昂贵的生物标志物尚未广泛应用的临床环境中,找出预测未来阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆症能力最强的指标:本研究利用了记忆门诊18年来的常规数据。从接受门诊评估的 2214 名患者中,我们选取了初步诊断为主观认知能力下降或轻度认知障碍的 328 名患者。我们比较了两种预测 AD 痴呆症的统计模型。第一种模型只包括基线认知测试得分,而第二种模型还包括基线和首次随访之间的得分变化:结果:总体认知功能测试(迷你精神状态检查和剑桥认知测试修订版)、言语外显记忆和精神运动速度的基线分数是预测老年痴呆症转化的最佳指标。将随访一年的认知变化评分纳入预测指标,比仅用基线评分提高了预测准确性:我们发现,在临床环境中,阿德痴呆症的最佳认知预测指标与之前通过研究队列确定的指标相似。考虑到认知功能的变化,可以更准确地预测AD痴呆症的发病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信