Quality effects of home acquisitions in residential aged care

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nicole Sutton, Nelson Ma, Jin Sug Yang, Jiali Lin
{"title":"Quality effects of home acquisitions in residential aged care","authors":"Nicole Sutton,&nbsp;Nelson Ma,&nbsp;Jin Sug Yang,&nbsp;Jiali Lin","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The recent consolidation of the Australian residential aged care market has raised concerns about the potential adverse effects of acquisition activity on quality of care (QoC). We examined changes in QoC outcomes within acquired homes and the influence of the acquiring providers' characteristics on these post-acquisition outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective observational study was conducted using de-identified data sets obtained under the legal authority of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Regression analysis was used to investigate post-acquisition changes in QoC outcomes for 225 Australian home acquisitions between 2015 and 2019. The outcomes were analysed for the first two full financial years before and after the acquisition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After controlling for other factors, we find acquired homes were associated with significantly worse QoC outcomes in the 2 years after acquisition, with higher rates of hospitalisations and reported complaints to the regulator. However, these results were driven by homes acquired by providers that were smaller in scale, for-profit or had comparatively poorer average quality across the other homes they operated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our finding that homes' QoC on average declines in the first 2 years following acquisition, are consistent with studies in other countries and points to the potential risks that consolidation poses to the care delivered to older people in Australia during that period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.13268","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The recent consolidation of the Australian residential aged care market has raised concerns about the potential adverse effects of acquisition activity on quality of care (QoC). We examined changes in QoC outcomes within acquired homes and the influence of the acquiring providers' characteristics on these post-acquisition outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted using de-identified data sets obtained under the legal authority of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Regression analysis was used to investigate post-acquisition changes in QoC outcomes for 225 Australian home acquisitions between 2015 and 2019. The outcomes were analysed for the first two full financial years before and after the acquisition.

Results

After controlling for other factors, we find acquired homes were associated with significantly worse QoC outcomes in the 2 years after acquisition, with higher rates of hospitalisations and reported complaints to the regulator. However, these results were driven by homes acquired by providers that were smaller in scale, for-profit or had comparatively poorer average quality across the other homes they operated.

Conclusions

Our finding that homes' QoC on average declines in the first 2 years following acquisition, are consistent with studies in other countries and points to the potential risks that consolidation poses to the care delivered to older people in Australia during that period.

养老院中家庭收购的质量影响。
目的:最近澳大利亚养老院市场的整合引发了人们对收购活动可能对养老院质量(QoC)产生不利影响的担忧。我们研究了被收购养老院的护理质量结果的变化,以及收购方的特征对这些收购后结果的影响:我们使用根据皇家老年护理质量与安全委员会的法律授权获得的去标识化数据集开展了一项回顾性观察研究。研究采用回归分析法,调查了 2015 年至 2019 年间收购的 225 家澳大利亚养老院在收购后质量控制结果方面的变化。对收购前后前两个完整财政年度的结果进行了分析:在控制了其他因素后,我们发现被收购的养老院在收购后两年内的质量控制结果明显较差,住院率和向监管机构报告的投诉率较高。然而,这些结果是由规模较小、以营利为目的或所经营的其他安老院的平均质量相对较差的供应商收购的安老院造成的:我们的研究结果表明,养老院在被收购后的头两年内,其平均质量控制水平会有所下降,这与其他国家的研究结果一致,同时也表明了在此期间,合并对澳大利亚老年人护理服务所带来的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信