Assessment and management of delirium in a tertiary hospital—Improvements in cognitive screening and use of non-pharmacological strategies with a multidisciplinary approach

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Emily Clarke, Ellie Newman, Madhu Dravid, Michael Ricciardello, Emma Jones, Katherine Caudle, Lucy Kilshaw, Samantha Hilmi, Leon Flicker
{"title":"Assessment and management of delirium in a tertiary hospital—Improvements in cognitive screening and use of non-pharmacological strategies with a multidisciplinary approach","authors":"Emily Clarke,&nbsp;Ellie Newman,&nbsp;Madhu Dravid,&nbsp;Michael Ricciardello,&nbsp;Emma Jones,&nbsp;Katherine Caudle,&nbsp;Lucy Kilshaw,&nbsp;Samantha Hilmi,&nbsp;Leon Flicker","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This series of audits aimed to determine current best practice in delirium management in a tertiary teaching hospital and to identify strategies to improve the quality of care in delirium with a focus on prevention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We completed a series of audits following the formation of the Cognitive Impairment Reference Group, a multidisciplinary team that was created to implement delirium management guidelines and monitor compliance. Audit 1 focused on antipsychotic use in patients aged 66 years and older. Audit 2 reviewed delirium care in the Acute Medical Ward. Audit 3 included ethnographic data and investigated the use of non-pharmacological methods to prevent and manage delirium in the Geriatric Ward. Two years on, Audit 4 is a repeat of Audit 1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were improved rates of cognitive screening between Audits 2 and 3 from 65% <i>n</i> = 40 to 86% <i>n</i> = 102, respectively. Most patients had one form of non-pharmacological strategy in place to prevent delirium however few had a multicomponent approach. Fewer patients were prescribed benzodiazepines alongside antipsychotics 28.57% <i>n</i> = 35 in Audit 1 compared to Audit 4 12.5% <i>n</i> = 32.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Improved quality of care in delirium management is achievable via a co-ordinated multidisciplinary approach. These audits demonstrated improvements in both rates of cognitive screening, and use of non-pharmacological strategies prior to antipsychotic medication use and better adherence to guidelines for antipsychotic prescribing. Areas for further development in delirium prevention include the uptake of screening and individualised non-pharmacological strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This series of audits aimed to determine current best practice in delirium management in a tertiary teaching hospital and to identify strategies to improve the quality of care in delirium with a focus on prevention.

Methods

We completed a series of audits following the formation of the Cognitive Impairment Reference Group, a multidisciplinary team that was created to implement delirium management guidelines and monitor compliance. Audit 1 focused on antipsychotic use in patients aged 66 years and older. Audit 2 reviewed delirium care in the Acute Medical Ward. Audit 3 included ethnographic data and investigated the use of non-pharmacological methods to prevent and manage delirium in the Geriatric Ward. Two years on, Audit 4 is a repeat of Audit 1.

Results

There were improved rates of cognitive screening between Audits 2 and 3 from 65% n = 40 to 86% n = 102, respectively. Most patients had one form of non-pharmacological strategy in place to prevent delirium however few had a multicomponent approach. Fewer patients were prescribed benzodiazepines alongside antipsychotics 28.57% n = 35 in Audit 1 compared to Audit 4 12.5% n = 32.

Conclusions

Improved quality of care in delirium management is achievable via a co-ordinated multidisciplinary approach. These audits demonstrated improvements in both rates of cognitive screening, and use of non-pharmacological strategies prior to antipsychotic medication use and better adherence to guidelines for antipsychotic prescribing. Areas for further development in delirium prevention include the uptake of screening and individualised non-pharmacological strategies.

一家三级医院对谵妄的评估和管理--改进认知筛查和使用非药物策略的多学科方法。
目的这一系列审核旨在确定一家三级教学医院目前在谵妄管理方面的最佳实践,并找出提高谵妄护理质量的策略,重点在于预防:我们在认知障碍参考小组成立后完成了一系列审计工作,该小组是一个多学科团队,旨在实施谵妄管理指南并监督遵守情况。审核 1 重点关注 66 岁及以上患者抗精神病药物的使用情况。审核 2 审查了急诊病房的谵妄护理。审核 3 包括人种学数据,并调查了老年病房使用非药物方法预防和管理谵妄的情况。两年后,第 4 次审核是第 1 次审核的重复:结果:在第 2 次和第 3 次审核之间,认知筛查率有所提高,分别从 65% n = 40 提高到 86% n = 102。大多数患者都采用了一种非药物治疗策略来预防谵妄,但采用多组分方法的患者很少。与第4次审计的12.5% n = 32相比,第1次审计中同时使用苯二氮卓类药物和抗精神病药物的患者人数较少,分别为28.57% n = 35和12.5% n = 32:通过协调多学科方法,可以提高谵妄管理的护理质量。这些审核结果表明,认知筛查率、使用抗精神病药物前的非药物治疗策略以及更好地遵守抗精神病药物处方指南的情况都有所改善。在预防谵妄方面需要进一步发展的领域包括筛查和个性化非药物治疗策略的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信