Electroconvulsive Therapy in the United States: A 2022 Survey of Practice.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Journal of Ect Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000991
Rachel Noorani, Paul Rohde, Elyssa Feuer, Sarah H Lisanby, William T Regenold
{"title":"Electroconvulsive Therapy in the United States: A 2022 Survey of Practice.","authors":"Rachel Noorani, Paul Rohde, Elyssa Feuer, Sarah H Lisanby, William T Regenold","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe current US electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice, identify practice changes over time, and inform discussion of practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our anonymous survey was open on SurveyMonkey.com from January to June 2022. We sent invitations to providers identified using a Medicare provider database, an advanced PubMed search function, and professional group listservs. Participants were instructed to submit 1 survey per ECT site. We examined frequency of responses, tabulated individual comments, and grouped data for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received responses from 74 US practice sites encompassing 283 providers. Forty-nine percent (n = 36) of respondents practiced at general academic medical centers, 23% (n = 17) at general medical centers, 16% (n = 12) at freestanding psychiatric hospitals, and 7% (n = 5) at Veterans Affairs medical centers. Proportions of female (29%) and Black or African American (AA) (1%) ECT providers were markedly lower than proportions of female (60%) and Black or African American ECT patients (10%). The median number of treatments for a major depressive episode was 10. The preferred electrode placement was right unilateral (66%, n = 45). The favored dosing strategy was seizure threshold titration. Quantitative outcome measures were used by 89% (n = 66) of sites for depressive symptoms and 84% (n = 62) for cognitive adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey is the first nationwide survey of ECT practice in nearly 40 years. Our results describe changes in practice over time and highlight the need to increase the number of female and Black or African American ECT providers. A comprehensive network of ECT sites could facilitate more frequent nationwide surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":"118-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe current US electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice, identify practice changes over time, and inform discussion of practice.

Method: Our anonymous survey was open on SurveyMonkey.com from January to June 2022. We sent invitations to providers identified using a Medicare provider database, an advanced PubMed search function, and professional group listservs. Participants were instructed to submit 1 survey per ECT site. We examined frequency of responses, tabulated individual comments, and grouped data for comparison.

Results: We received responses from 74 US practice sites encompassing 283 providers. Forty-nine percent (n = 36) of respondents practiced at general academic medical centers, 23% (n = 17) at general medical centers, 16% (n = 12) at freestanding psychiatric hospitals, and 7% (n = 5) at Veterans Affairs medical centers. Proportions of female (29%) and Black or African American (AA) (1%) ECT providers were markedly lower than proportions of female (60%) and Black or African American ECT patients (10%). The median number of treatments for a major depressive episode was 10. The preferred electrode placement was right unilateral (66%, n = 45). The favored dosing strategy was seizure threshold titration. Quantitative outcome measures were used by 89% (n = 66) of sites for depressive symptoms and 84% (n = 62) for cognitive adverse effects.

Conclusions: This survey is the first nationwide survey of ECT practice in nearly 40 years. Our results describe changes in practice over time and highlight the need to increase the number of female and Black or African American ECT providers. A comprehensive network of ECT sites could facilitate more frequent nationwide surveys.

美国的电休克疗法:2022 年实践调查》。
目的:本研究旨在描述当前美国的电休克疗法(ECT)实践:本研究旨在描述当前美国的电休克疗法(ECT)实践,确定实践随时间推移而发生的变化,并为实践讨论提供信息:我们的匿名调查于 2022 年 1 月至 6 月在 SurveyMonkey.com 上进行。我们向通过医疗保险提供者数据库、PubMed 高级搜索功能和专业团体列表服务器找到的提供者发出了邀请。我们要求参与者在每个 ECT 机构提交一份调查问卷。我们检查了回复频率,将个人意见制成表格,并将数据分组进行比较:我们收到了来自美国 74 个实践基地、283 名医疗服务提供者的回复。49%(n = 36)的受访者在综合学术医疗中心执业,23%(n = 17)在综合医疗中心执业,16%(n = 12)在独立精神病医院执业,7%(n = 5)在退伍军人事务医疗中心执业。女性(29%)和黑人或非裔美国人(AA)(1%)ECT 提供者的比例明显低于女性(60%)和黑人或非裔美国人 ECT 患者(10%)的比例。重度抑郁发作的治疗次数中位数为 10 次。首选的电极位置是右侧单侧(66%,n = 45)。首选的剂量策略是发作阈值滴定。89%(n = 66)的治疗点采用了抑郁症状定量结果测量法,84%(n = 62)的治疗点采用了认知不良反应定量结果测量法:这项调查是近 40 年来首次对电疗实践进行的全国性调查。我们的结果描述了随着时间推移在实践中发生的变化,并强调需要增加女性和黑人或非裔美国人 ECT 提供者的数量。一个全面的电痉挛疗法场所网络可以促进更频繁的全国性调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信